The current ‘gold standard’ method for enabling weightbearing during non-invasive lower limb immobilisation is to use a Patella Tendon-Bearing (PTB) or Sarmiento cast. The Beagle Böhler Walker™ is a non-invasive frame that fits onto a standard below knee plaster cast. It is designed to achieve a reduction in force across the foot and ankle. Our objective was to measure loading forces through the foot to examine how different types of casts affect load distribution. We aimed to determine whether the Beagle Böhler Walker™ is as effective or better, at reducing load distribution during full weightbearing. We applied force sensors to the 1st and 5th metatarsal heads and the plantar surface of the calcaneum of 14 healthy volunteers. Force measurements were taken without a cast applied and then with a Sarmiento Cast, a below knee cast, and a below knee cast with Böhler Walker™ fitted.Background
Methods
Lisfranc joint injuries are increasingly recognised in elite soccer and rugby players. Currently no evidence-based guidelines exist on timeframes for return to training and competition following surgical treatment. This study aimed to see whether return to full competition following surgery for Lisfranc injuries was possible in these groups and to assess times to training, playing and possible related factors. Over 46-months, a consecutive series of fifteen professional soccer (6) and rugby(9) players in the English Premierships/Championship, was assessed using prospectively collected data. All were isolated injuries, sustained during competitive matches. Each had clinical and radiological evidence of injury and was treated surgically within thirty-one days. A standardised postoperative regime was used.Introduction
Material/Methods
NHS governance demands that services provided are clinically effective and safe. In the current financial climate and threats over public sector spending cuts, services offered by health care providers should also be cost-effective and profitable. Surgical specialties are often perceived as expensive with high implant costs. The aim of this audit was to cost the profit margin for foot/ankle surgery and test the accuracy of coding data collected. Theatre data between January-April 2010 was retrospectively reviewed. Equipment inventories, operation notes and radiographs were reviewed for implants used. Clinical coding data was analysed and coded separately by the surgeon for comparison. Theatre expenses were calculated and accuracy estimated. Tariff generated and patient expenses were calculated and a final profit margin revealed. Wilcoxon matched-pair testing compared hospital recorded and surgeon calculated data. 95 cases were included (51 forefoot, 5 midfoot, 6 arthroscopy, 12 hindfoot, 21 other), 65 female and 30 male patients. Theatre inventories were correct in 11% of cases. Mean inventory costs recorded were £90 and following surgeon analysis, £319. Total actual inventory cost was £30,306.23 but £8548.58 was recorded (p<0.0001). OPCS codes were deemed correct in 43% and incorrect in 57% of cases. Operation profit margin, including theatre, ward and salary costs was recorded as £158,229 but corrected profit margin with d inventories and OPCS codes was £121,584 (p=0.001).Materials and Methods
Results
