Open fractures are uncommon in the UK sporting population, however because of their morbidity then are a significant patient group. Currently there is very little in the literature describing the epidemiology of open fracture in sport. We describe the epidemiology of sport related open fractures from one centre's adult patient population.

Retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database recording all sport related open fracture s over a 15 year period in a standard population.

Over the 15 year period, there were 85 fractures in 84 patients. The mean age was 29.2 years (range 15–67). 70 (83%) were male and fourteen female (17%). The six most common sports were football (n=19, 22%), rugby (n=9, 11%), cycling (n=8, 9%), hockey (n=8, 9%); horse riding (n=6, 7%) and skiing (n=6, 7%). The top five anatomical locations were fingers phalanges, 35%; tibia-fibula 23%; foreman 14%; ankle 11% and metacarpals 5%. The mean injury severity score was 7.02. Forty five patients were grade 1; 28 patients were grade 2; 8 patients were grade 3a; and 4 were grade 3b according to the Gustilo-Anderson classification system. Seven patients (8%) required plastic surgical intervention for the treatment of these fractures. The types of flaps used were split skin graft (n=4), fasciocutaneous flaps (n=2); and adipofascial flap (n=1).

We looked at the epidemiology open fractures secondary to sport in one centre over a 15 year period. Football was the most common sport (22%) and within football, the most common site was the tibia and fibula. In contrast, within the cohort a whole the majority of fractures were upper limb, with the hand being the most common site. Whilst not common in sport, when they are sustained they are frequently occur on muddy sport fields or forest tracks and must be treated appropriately. A good understanding of the range and variety of injuries commonly sustained in different sports is important for clinicians and sports therapists.

To describe the treatment and morbidity of lower limb (LL) football fractures in regard to returning to football in a known UK population at all skill levels.

All football fractures during 2007–2008 sustained by the Lothian population were prospectively collected with the diagnosis being confirmed by the senior author when patients attended the only adult orthopaedic service in Lothian. Patients living outside the region were excluded from the study. Patients were contacted in August 2010 to ascertain their progress in return to football.

There were 424 fractures in 414 patients. 366 fractures (86%) in 357 patients (86%) were followed up with a mean interval of 30 months (range 24–36 months). Of these 32% were sustained in the LL. 88% of LL injuries returned to football compared to 85% of upper limb (UL) fractures (p=0.4). 60% of LL patients were treated as outpatients. 35% were operated on −26% had ORIF and 9% IM Nailing. The most common LL fractures were Ankle 38%, Tibial Diaphysis 14%, 5th Metatarsal 11%, Fibula 9% and Great Toe 7%. Only one of the fractures was an open injury - Gustillo Class 1 2nd Phallanx Foot. Three of the 12 patients who underwent IM nailing required fasciotomy. One patient in the operative cohort developed a significant infection. The mean time for return to football for conservative treatment was 17 weeks (range 3–104 weeks), and for operative treatment 41 weeks (range 10–104 weeks). 91% of patients treated conservatively returned to football, compared to 84% of the operative cohort (p=0.3). 43% of patients had ongoing symptoms from their injury. 9% of the operative cohort required removal of metal work or further operative intervention. 83% of patients returned to the same level of football or higher following injury. Patients under 30 were 1.4 times more likely to return to sport than those over 30 (p<0.05).

We have previously demonstrated that football is the most common cause of sporting fracture(1), yet little is known about patient outcome following fractures. LL fractures are less common than UL fractures, and there is no difference in the proportion of patients returning to football following LL fractures and UL fractures. Over half of LL fractures are treated as outpatients and the incidence of open fractures is very low. There is no significant difference between the operative and conservative groups in their return to football. In the over 30 age group, sustaining a fracture may act as a catalyst to quit football. This may explain the higher non-return rate compared to the under 30 age group. 43% of patients perceive that they have ongoing problems with their fracture over 24 months post-injury reflecting the considerable morbidity of football-related fractures.