Aim

Peri-prosthetic joint infection is a serious and expensive complication of joint arthroplasty. Theatre discipline has infection prevention at its core with multiple studies correlating increased door opening with surgical site infection. The WHO, NICE and Philadelphia Consensus all advocate minimal theatre traffic. The Dutch Health Inspectorate consider >5 door openings per procedure excessive.

Following the recommendation of NICE guidelines (CG124) we have recently started using cemented smooth tapered stem hemiarthroplasty as our standard management of intra-capsular neck of femur fractures. Prior to publication of the above guidelines the standard implant utilised was Thompson Hemiarthroplasty prosthesis. The cost implications of this change have not been fully appreciated and the benefit of these changes in ASA grade 3–4 patients has not previously been analysed.

We identified a cohort of 89 patients admitted with displaced intra-capsular neck of femur fracture with an ASA grade 3–4. These underwent hip hemiarthroplaties at our centre over a period of 12 months (before and after guideline implementation). Data regarding in-hospital mortality, dislocation, reoperation and place of discharge were retrospectively collected and analysed.

Our cohort included 46 patients who underwent a Thompsons Hemiarthroplasty, 30 patients who had a cemented smooth tapered stem hemiarthroplasty and 13 patients who had an Austin-moore Hemiarthroplasty.

In-patient mortality rates were highest in the Austin-moore group, followed by the Thompsons group compared to none in the smooth tapered stem group. However, this was not statistically significant. One patient in the Thompsons group and one patient in the smooth tapered group had multiple dislocations and re-operations, compared with none in the Austin-moore group. In terms of percentage of patients who were discharged home from hospital the smooth tapered stem group had a percentage that was more than twice that of the Thompson's which was in turn higher than that found in the Austin-moore group.

In conclusion, our data suggests that in patients with an ASA grade of 3–4 there is no significant benefit from using cemented smooth tapper stems when performing a Hip Hemiarthroplasty compared with a well performed Thompsons and that the cost savings of this is significant. We accept that our current numbers are relatively small and further work is needed.

Acetabular fractures are amongst the most complex fractures. It has been suggested that pre-contouring the fixation plates may save intra-operative time, blood loss, reduce intra-operative fluoroscopy and improve the reduction. The purpose of this study was to assess if the contouring could be done reliably using the mirror image of the uninjured hemipelvis.

Using the CT data of 12 specimens with no bony abnormality 3D models were reconstructed. Using computer software (AMIRA, Visage Imaging) the mirror image of the left hemipelvis and the right hemipelvis were superimposed based on landmarks. The distances between the surfaces were then calculated and displayed in the form of colour maps.

The colour maps demonstrated that for the areas around were acetabular fixation plates would be placed the differences were small. For the anterior column plate 50% of the specimens had differences of less than 1mm, which based on the work of Letournel and Judet would represent an anatomical reduction. For the posterior column plate 58% had differences of less than 1mm.

This study demonstrates that there is considerable symmetry between both hemipelvises and that precontouring on the mirror image of the uninjured side is an accurate, quick and reliable method for precontouring.

Acetabular fractures are amongst the most complex fractures to treat. It has been suggested that pre-contouring the fixation plates may save intra-operative time, blood loss, reduce intra-operative fluoroscopy and improve the reduction. The purpose of this study was to assess if the contouring could be done reliably using the mirror image of the uninjured hemipelvis.

Using the CT data of 12 specimens with no bony abnormality 3D models were reconstructed. Using computer software (AMIRA, Visage Imaging) the mirror image of the left hemipelvis and the right hemipelvis were superimposed based on landmarks. The distances between the surfaces were then calculated.

The results were collected in the form of mean distance and colour maps. The mean difference between surfaces ranged from 1.76mm and 8.47mm. The colour maps demonstrated that for the areas around were acetabular fixation plated would be placed the differences were small. For the anterior column plate 6 (50%) of the specimens had differences of less than 1mm, which based on the work of Letournel and Judet would represent an anatomical reduction. (None had a difference of more than 6mm.) For the posterior column plate 7 (58%) had differences of less than 1mm. (None had a difference of more than 3mm.

This study demonstrates that there is considerable symmetry between both hemipelvises and that precontouring on the mirror image of the uninjured side is an accurate, quick and reliable method for precontouring. However the symmetry is not exact and the operating surgeon needs to be aware that fine-contouring may be required intra-operatively.

Cervical spine collars are applied in trauma situations to immobilise patients' cervical spines. Whilst movement of the cervical spine following the application of a collar has been well documented, the movement in the cervical spine during the application of a collar has not been. There is universal agreement that C-spine collars should be applied to patients involved in high speed trauma, but there is no consensus as to the best method of application.

The clinical authors have been shown two different techniques on how to apply the C-spine collars in their Advanced Life Support Training (ATLS). One technique is the same as that recommended by the Laerdal Company (Laerdal Medical Ltd, Kent) that manufactures the cervical spine collar that we looked at. The other technique was refined by a Neurosurgeon with an interest in pre-hospital care. In both techniques the subjects' head is immobilised by an assistant whilst the collar is applied.

We aimed to quantify which of these techniques caused the least movement to the cervical spine. There is no evidence in the literature quantifying how much movement in any plane in the unstable cervical spine is safe. Therefore, we worked on the principle: the less movement the better.

The Qualisys Motion Capture System (Qualisys AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) was used to create an environment that would measure movement on the neck during collar application. This system consisted of cameras that were pre-positioned in a set order determined by trial and error initially. These cameras captured reflected infra-red light from markers placed on anatomically defined points on the subject's body. As the position of the cameras was fixed then as the patients moved the markers through space, a software package could deduce the relative movement of the markers to each camera with 6 degrees of freedom (6DOF).

Six healthy volunteers (3 M, 3 F; age 21-29) with no prior neck injuries acted as subjects. The collar was always applied by the same person. Each technique was used 3 times on each subject. To replicate the clinical situation another volunteer would hold the head for each test.

The movements we measured were along the x, y, and z axes, thus acting as an approximation to flexion, extension and rotation occurring at the C-spine during collar application. The average movement in each axis (x, y and z) was 8 degrees, 8 degrees and 5 degrees respectively for both techniques. No further data analysis was attempted on this small data set.

However this pilot study shows that our method enables researchers to reproducibly collect data about cervical spine movement whilst applying a cervical collar.

Background

Lack of ankle dorsiflexion secondary to a tight gastrocnemius-soleus complex is believed to be a contributing factor in forefoot pain particularly metatarsalgia. It is believed that by lengthening the gastroc-soleus complex weight is distributed more evenly over the foot reducing symptoms. However lengthening any tendon, especially using a percutaneous method carries risks of over-lengthening. In the summer of 2008 we started to see some patients who complained of significant weakness in their Achilles tendons following the 3 cut percutaneous tenotomy procedure.