To identify the incidence of sequential slip of the unaffected hips in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE managed with prophylactic fixation or observation. A retrospective review of all unilateral SCFE treated during 1998 to 2012 was undertaken. The study compares the incidence of sequential slip of the initially unaffected hip in patients managed with prophylactic fixation or observation. The study also reports the incidence avascular necrosis, chondrolysis, and metal-work related problem in this group of patients. All patients included in this current work have at least 12 months of follow-up from the index slip. A total of 44 cases had prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hip (mean age 12.6 years,) and 36 patients managed with regular observation (mean age 13.4 years). Sequential slip of the unaffected hip was noted in a total of 10 patients (28 %) managed with regular observation and only in 1 patient (2%) managed with prophylactic fixation. A Fishers exact test showed significantly high incidence of sequential slip in unaffected hips when managed by regular observation (p-value-0.002). There is no evidence of avascular necrosis or chondrolysis in the unaffected hip in both groups, 3 patients had metalwork related problem and one had superficial wound infection in prophylactic fixation group. Simultaneous prophylactic fixation of the unaffected hips significantly reduces the incidence of sequential slip. This is a relatively safe procedure and should be advocated in all cases of unilateral SCFE to avoid potential complications and preserve function of the unaffected hip.
The aim of this study was to examine the loading
of the other joints of the lower limb in patients with unilateral osteoarthritis
(OA) of the knee. We recruited 20 patients with no other symptoms
or deformity in the lower limbs from a consecutive cohort of patients
awaiting knee replacement. Gait analysis and electromyographic recordings were
performed to determine moments at both knees and hips, and contraction
patterns in the medial and lateral quadriceps and hamstrings bilaterally.
The speed of gait was reduced in the group with OA compared with
the controls, but there were only minor differences in stance times
between the limbs. Patients with OA of the knee had significant
increases in adduction moment impulse at both knees and the contralateral
hip (adjusted p-values: affected knee: p <
0.01, unaffected knee
p = 0.048, contralateral hip p = 0.03), and significantly increased
muscular co-contraction bilaterally compared with controls (all
comparisons for co-contraction, p <
0.01). The other major weight-bearing joints are at risk from abnormal
biomechanics in patients with unilateral OA of the knee. Cite this article:
