Over the last few years low dose digital radiography (DR) has all but replaced traditional chemical image processing. This appears to have created a paradigm shift in the suitability of intraoperative radiographic guidance for total hip arthroplasty. It is the purpose of this publication to describe our preferred technique and assess its reliability in achieving the desired parameters of a successful total hip arthroplasty.

A consecutive prospective evaluation of 150 primary total hip arthroplasties employing intraoperative digital radiography was carried out. An anteroposterior pelvic radiograph with the patient in the lateral decubitus position was obtained for all hips. The orientation of the intraoperative film was matched to that of the preoperative pelvic radiograph. The image was taken after placement of the acetabular component and best estimate of femoral trial size, position, and head and neck length. The DR system produced an image within 6 seconds of exposure. This trial radiograph was then used to make adjustments. Given that the cassette does not have to be moved for image processing, a precise anteroposterior film was obtained by simply adjusting the operating table. Two to three minutes were allotted for each radiograph. Corrections to stem size, cup position, screw length and position, limb length, and offset were made based on this intraoperative radiograph. The final intraoperative image was then compared to a postoperative standard radiograph in supine position at 2 weeks after total hip arthroplasty to verify the accuracy of intraoperative digital radiography. Abduction angle, limb length, offset, and canal fit and fill were assessed for confirmation of the validity of the intraoperative imaging technique.

Acetabular abduction angle was determined with a mean of 43 degrees (range, 35 to 48 degrees). The intraoperative measurement was within 3 degrees of the postoperative measurement in all cases. Adjustment of acetabular cup orientation was performed 10% of the time based on the intraoperative radiograph. Apposition was within 2 mm 100% of the time. Re-seating of the cup was carried out in one hip only. Femoral component was neutral in 92% and between 3 and 5 degrees of varus in 8%. Femoral component was upsized 55% of the time. Intraoperatively measured limb length discrepancy and offset were within 3 mm of the postoperative measurement in all hips.

Intraoperative digital imaging is a reliable tool for achieving the desired radiographic results in THA. The technique is efficient and affordable. The high rate of success in this series suggests that this technology should contribute to a paradigm shift in the standard of care in total hip arthroplasty.