Meniscus allograft and synthetic meniscus scaffold (Actifit®) transplantation have shown promising outcomes for symptoms relief in patients with meniscus deficient knees. Untreated chondral defects can place excessive load onto meniscus transplants and cause early graft failure. We hypothesised that combined ACI and allograft or synthetic meniscus replacement might provide a solution for meniscus deficient individuals with co-existing lesions in cartilage and meniscus. We retrospectively collected data from 17 patients (16M, 1F, aged 40±9.26) who had ACI and meniscus allograft transplant (MAT), 8 patients (7M, 1F, aged 42±11) who underwent ACI and Actifit® meniscus scaffold replacement. Other baseline data included BMI, pre-operative procedures and cellular transplant data. Patients were assessed by pre-operative, one-year and last follow-up Lysholm score, one-year repair site biopsy, MRI evaluations.Abstract
Objectives
Methods
Randomised controlled study evaluating new bone formation Regenerating new bone by cell therapy could provide therapeutic options in many conditions such as fracture non-unions and osteo-chondral defect regeneration in advance OA. In this randomised controlled study we evaluated the efficacy of new bone formation by bone marrow derived stromal cells (BMSC) in patients with non-union.Summary
Introduction
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) is frequently used to treat chondral defects in the knee with a good long-term outcome. This is contraindicatd in meniscal deficient knees. Allogenic Menicsal Transplantation (AMT) has been shown to give good symptomatic relief in meniscus deficient knees. However this is contraindicated in advanced cartilage degeneration. We hypothesized that combination of these two might be a solution for bone-on-bone arthritis in young individuals. We studied a consecutive series of 12 patients who underwent combined ACI and AMT between 1998 and 2005. Pre operative and post operative comparisons of lysholm scores were recorded. Magnetic Resonance Imaging was performed to assess the integration ACI & AMT. Arthroscopy was performed at one year for assessment and obtain biopsy for histological examination.Background
Methods
Thrust plate prosthesis (TPP) is a bone conserving prosthesis in use for over thirty years. TPP is a stemless and uncemented femoral prosthesis fixed at the lateral femoral cortex with a bolt, plate and screw. This has a metal-on-metal articulation with a 28mm Metasul head and Allofit press fit acetabular cup. Our study aimed to assess the functional outcome of this prosthesis. In our institution 234 TTPs were implanted between 1995 and 2005. All patients completed a self-assessed questionnaire of Harris Hip Score at 2 months, 1 year, and then yearly. Only those who had a follow up was within the last two years were included in the analysis. 76 patients who had failed to satisfy the criteria were excluded. Of the 158 hips in the study 75 hips were in male patients and 83 were in female patients. The median age of patients was 52 years (range 15 to 82). 75 hips were on the right side and 83 on the left. All patients were operated by the senior author or a senior trainee under his supervision (seven hips). Revision of the implant or decision to revise was taken as the end point of our study.Background
Methods
Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) is a procedure which is gaining acceptance for the treatment of cartilage defects in the knee with good results and a long term durable outcome. Its use in other joints has been limited, mainly to the ankle. We aimed to assess the outcome of ACI in the treatment of chondral and osteochondral defects in the hip. Fifteen patients underwent ACI for chondral or osteochondral defects in the femoral head with a follow up of upto 8 years (mean of 2 years) in our institution with a mean age of 37 years at the time of operation. Pre-operatively hip function was assessed by using the Harris Hip Score and MRI. Post-operatively these were repeated at 1 year and hip scores repeated annually. Failure was defined as a second ACI to the operated lesion or a conversion to a hip resurfacing or replacement.Background
Methods
Hip resurfacing has resurged in the last decade due to a renewed interest in metal on metal bearing. One of the proposed advantages is ease of revision of the femoral component. Short term functional results after femoral revision are similar to those after conventional total hip replacement. Survival and function after revision of the acetabular component only or of both components have not been reported. We aimed to assess hip function and implant survival after revision of the acetabular component for failed Birmingham hip resurfacing (BHR). The Oswestry Outcome Centre collected data prospectively on 5000 patients who underwent hip resurfacing between 1997 and 2002. Of these, 182 hips were revised: 42% had revision of the femoral component only, 8% revision of the acetabular component only, and 50% revision of both components. This study analyzed patients who had revision of the acetabular component, either in isolation or in combination with the femoral component.Background
Methods
