A higher failure rate has been reported in haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to non-haematogenous PJI. The reason for this difference is unknown. We investigated the outcome of haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI to analyze the risk factors for failure in both groups of patients. Episodes of knee or hip PJI (defined by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society criteria) treated at our institution between January 2015 and October 2020 were included in a retrospective PJI cohort. Episodes with a follow-up of > one year were stratified by route of infection into haematogenous and non-haematogenous PJI. Probability of failure-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared between groups using log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis was applied to assess risk factors for failure.Aims
Methods
Antimicrobial suppression has shown to significantly improve treatment success of streptococcal periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) compared to 12-week standard antimicrobial therapy, however, only short-term follow-up was investigated. In this study we assessed the impact of suppression on the long-term outcome of streptococcal PJI. Consecutive patients with streptococcal PJI (defined by EBJIS criteria) treated 2009–2021 were prospectively included and allocated into standard and suppression (> 6 months) treatment group. Infection-free survival was assessed with Kaplan-Meier-method and compared between the groups with log rank test. Rates of infection-free, streptococcal infection-free and relapse-free status as well as tolerability of suppression were assessed.Aim
Method
Surgical and antimicrobial treatment of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) depends largely on the causative pathogen. We assessed the pathogen detection rates and the concordance of preoperative synovial fluid culture and culture of intraoperative samples harvested during revision surgery in patients with PJI. Culture-positive PJI cases treated at our institution from 02/2011 to 07/2018, for which culture results from preoperative (synovial fluid) and intraoperative samples (periprosthetic tissue, synovial or sonication fluid) were available, were retrospectively assessed. For organisms belonging to the resident skin flora (coagulase-negative staphylococci, cutibacteria and corynebacteria) significant growth was considered, if the identical pathogen grew in ≥2 samples or >50 cfu/ml sonication fluid. For other pathogens (S. aureus, streptococci, enterococci, fungi and gram-negative rods) or patients under antimicrobials, any growth was considered positive. We determined the pathogen detection rate in preoperative and intraoperative cultures and compared it in different subgroups using Fisher's exact test. Furthermore, we assessed the concordance of preoperative and intraoperative cultures.Aim
Method
In 2013, we introduced a specialized, centralized, and interdisciplinary team in our institution that applied a standardized diagnostic and treatment algorithm for the management of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs). The hypothesis for this study was that the outcome of treatment would be improved using this approach. In a retrospective analysis with a standard postoperative follow-up, 95 patients with a PJI of the hip and knee who were treated with a two-stage exchange between 2013 and 2017 formed the study group. A historical cohort of 86 patients treated between 2009 and 2011 not according to the standardized protocol served as a control group. The success of treatment was defined according to the Delphi criteria in a two-year follow-up.Aims
Patients and Methods
Data of optimal management of infections after internal fixation (IIF) is scarce and long-term follow-up results often lack. We analyzed characteristics of infections after intramedullary (IIIF) and extramedullary long bone fixation (IEIF) and evaluated their infection and functional outcome. Consecutive patients with IIF diagnosed at our institution from 01/2010-10/2017 were retrospectively included. Infection was defined as visible purulence, sinus tract, microbial growth in ≥2 independent samples or positive histopathology. The outcome was compared before and after implementation of a comprehensive surgical and antimicrobial treatment algorithm in 04/2013.Aim
Method
Optimal strategies for surgical and antimicrobial management of Patients treated at our institution with Aim
Method
Two stage revision is the most commonly used surgical treatment strategy for periprosthetic hip infections (PHI). The aim of our study was to assess the intra- and postoperative complications during and after two stage revision using resection arthroplasty between ex- and reimplantation. In this retrospective cohort study, all patients treated with a two stage revision using resection arthroplasty for PHI were included from 2008 to 2014. During the first stage, the prosthesis was removed resulting in a resection arthroplasty without the use a PMMA spacer. During second stage, (cemented or uncemented) reimplantation of the hip prosthesis was performed. The cohort was stratified into two groups according to the length of prosthesis-free interval (≤10 weeks and >10 weeks). Data on complications during explantation, prosthesis-free interval, reimplantation, and after reimplantation was collected. The overall complication rate between both groups was compared using the chi-squared test. The revision-free and infection-free survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.Aim
Method
Spinal implant-associated infections (SIAI) require combined surgical and antimicrobial treatment and prolonged hospital stay. We evaluated the clinical, laboratory, microbiological and radiological characteristics and treatment approaches in patients with SIAI. Consecutive adult patients with SIAI treated between 2015 and 2017 were prosepctively included. SIAI was defined by: (i) significant microbial growth from intraoperative tissue or sonication fluid, (ii) intraoperative purulence, secondary wound dehiscence or implant on view, (iii) radiographic evidence of infection and fever (>38°C) without other recognized cause, increasing back pain or neurologic impairment, (iv) peri-implant tissue inflammation in histopathology.Aim
Method
Treatment of enterococcal periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) is challenging due to heterogeneous pathogenesis, non-standardized management strategies and lack of biofilm-active antibiotics. Previous studies report treatment success from 50–76%. We evaluated the characteristics and outcome of enterococcal PJI, in particular the influence of antimicrobial treatment regimens. Consecutive patients with enterococcal PJI treated at two specialized orthopaedic institutions were retrospectively included from 2010 to 2017. PJI was defined by the proposed European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) criteria. Adequate antimicrobial treatment was considered when the antibiotic was appropiate for the treatment of enterococcal bone infections (activity, dose, oral bioavailability, bone penetration). The treatment success (defined as no relapse of enteroccal infection) and clinical success(i.e. infection-free status) was evaluated and compared using Fishers exact test.Aim
Method
Radiologic signs such as radiolucent lines around the implant, hardware fracture or displacement and periosteal reaction have been considered suggestive of implant-associated infection. The goal of this study is to assess the correlation of these signs with confirmed internal fixation-associated infection evaluated in a prospective cohort. We evaluated the radiologic appearance of preoperative standard x-ray images in 421 surgeries performed in 380 patients with internal fixation device in place (56.8% male, mean age 53 ± 17 years). This prospective study was performed in a large single center for musculoskeletal surgery from 2013–2017. Infection was suspected preoperatively in only 23.8% of the surgeries. The most common indications for surgeries in which infection was not suspected were nonunion (84 cases) and symptomatic hardware (57 cases). All removed implants were sent to sonication for biofilm removal and detection. In addition, several peri-implant tissue samples were collected. Radiographs were analyzed in a blinded fashion for signs of radiolucent lines around the implant before removal, hardware fracture or displacement, and soft periosteal reactions suggestive of infection. Diagnosis was established according to the IDSA criteria for PJI. Contingency tables were constructed to determine sensitivity and specificity, and to perform Chi-square tests to compare the presence of infection with radiological signs of infection.Aim
Method
Unexpected positive infections are distinct entity in prosthetic revision surgery. The prevalence and characteristics of unexpected positive cultures in internal fixation are however less established. The aim of this study was to describe the prevalence and characteristics of unexpected diagnosis of infection in a prospective cohort of revision surgeries following internal fixation. We reviewed the microbiological results following 356 surgeries that included partial or complete removal of internal fixation, performed in 328 patients (54% male, mean age 53 ± 17 years), in which infection was not initially suspected. This prospective study was performed in a large single center for musculoskeletal surgery from 2013–2017. The implants most commonly removed were plate and/or screws (281 cases, 78,9%), followed by intramedullary nails (64 cases, 18,0%). The main indications for surgery were nonunion (89 cases, 25%) and symptomatic hardware (70 cases, 19,7%). All removed implants were sonicated, and tissue cultures were obtained depending on the surgeon's criteria. Diagnosis of infection was established by the presence of 2 or more positive tissue cultures (1 with a highly virulent microorganism), or ≥ 50 colony-forming units found in the sonication fluid.Aim
Method
We included 26 patients suffering from We conclude that
The aim of the study was to assess the accuracy of the alpha defensin lateral flow test for diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) using an optimized diagnostic algorithm and three classification systems. In addition, we compared the performance with synovial fluid leukocyte count, the most sensitive preoperative test. In this prospective multicenter study we included all consecutive patients with painful prosthetic hip and knee joints undergoing diagnostic joint aspiration. Alpha defensin lateral flow test was used according to manufacturer instructions. The following diagnostic criteria were used to confirm infection: Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Swiss orthopedics and Swiss Society of Infectious Diseases (SOSSID). In the latter, PJI was confirmed when at least one of following criteria applied: macroscopic purulence, sinus tract, positive cytology of joint aspirate (>2000 leukocytes/μl or >70% granulocytes), histological proof of acute inflammation in periprosthetic tissue, positive culture (from aspirate, tissue or sonication fluid). Infection was classified as chronic, if symptom duration was more than 3 weeks or if infection manifested after more than 1 month after surgery. The sensitivity and specificity of the alpha defensin lateral flow test and leukocyte count in synovial fluid were calculated and compared using McNemar Chi-square test.Aim
Method
The incidence of hematogenous periprosthetic joint infections (hPJI) is unknown and the cases probably largely underreported. Unrecognized and untreated primary infectious foci may cause continuous bacteremia, further spread of microorganisms and thus treatment failure or relapse of infection. This study aimed at improving knowledge about primary foci and microbiological characteristics of this entity to establish preventive measures and improve diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to counteract hPJI. We retrospectively analysed all consecutive patients with hPJI, who were treated at our institution from January 2010 until December 2016. Diagnosis of PJI was established if 1 of the following criteria applied:(i) macroscopic purulence, (ii) presence of sinus tract, (iii) positive cytology of joint aspirate (>2000 leukocytes/μl or >70% granulocytes), (iv) significant microbial growth in synovial fluid, periprosthetic tissue or sonication culture of retrieved prosthesis components, (v) positive histopathology. PJI was classified as hematogenous if the following criteria were fulfilled additionally: (1) onset of symptoms more than 1 month after arthroplasty AND (2) i) isolation of the same organism in blood cultures OR ii) evidence of a distant infectious focus consistent with the pathogen.Aim
Method
Alpha-defensin is a new synovial fluid biomarker for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infections (PJI). We compared the performance of two different alpha-defensin assays: quantitative ELISA test and qualitative lateral flow test. In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients with a painful prosthesis of the lower limb were eligible for inclusion. In addition to standard diagnostics of PJI, alpha-defensin was determined in the aspirated synovial fluid between October 2016 and April 2017. PJI was defined according to the modified Zimmerli criteria, the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria and the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) criteria. A positive quantitative alpha-defensin test was defined at a cut-off value of 5.2 mg/L. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and area under the curve of each test were determined and the AUCs were compared among each other.Aim
Method
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJI), caused by pathogens, for which no biofilm-active antibiotics are available, are often referred to as difficult-to-treat (DTT). It is unclear whether DTT PJI has worse outcome due to unavailability of biofilm-active antibiotics. We evaluated the outcome of DTT and non-DTT PJI managed according to a standardized treatment regimen. Patients with hip and knee PJI from 2013 to 2015 were prospectively included and followed-up for ≥2 years. DTT PJI was defined as growth of microorganism(s) resistant to biofilm-active antibiotics. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare the probability of infection-free survival between DTT and non-DTT PJI.Background
Methods
To assess the clinical characteristics, diagnostic tests and treatment strategies in orthopedic implant-associated infections (OIAI) caused by Cutibacterium spp. We retrospectively included consecutive patients with OIAI caused by Cutibacterium spp. treated at our institution from January 2012 to January 2017. OIAI was diagnosed when: (i) macroscopic purulence, sinus tract or exposed implant was present; (ii) acute inflammation in peri-implant-tissue was documented; (iii) Cutibacterium spp. grew in joint aspirate, ≥2 intraoperative peri-implant tissue samples or in sonication fluid of the removed implant (>50 CFU/ml).Aim
Method
To investigate the outcomes of treatment of streptococcal periprosthetic
joint infection (PJI) involving total knee and hip arthroplasties. Streptococcal PJI episodes which occurred between January 2009
and December 2015 were identified from clinical databases. Presentation
and clinical outcomes for 30 streptococcal PJIs in 30 patients (12
hip and 18 knee arthroplasties) following treatment were evaluated
from the medical notes and at review. The Kaplan-Meier survival method
was used to estimate the probability of infection-free survival.
The influence of the biofilm active antibiotic rifampin was also
assessed.Aims
Patients and Methods
