To determine the onset, incidence and associated symptoms of adverse noise emissions following total hip arthroplasty (THA) with ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing surfaces 50 Sequential CoC THA's (45 patients) performed by a single surgeon were interviewed telephonically at an average post-operative period of 12 months. The same group was re-interviewed telephonically 12 months later. Patients who reported noise emissions at either interview were assessed clinically to determine if symptoms could be reproduced.Purpose of study
Methods
The deltamotion bearing system provides a large bearing even with small acetabular components. With optimally placed components the risk of dislocation is extremely low. However the acetabular component is a monobloc system and has significant technical considerations. This is an early series of patients to determine whether a monobloc system can be reliable placed in an acceptable position 66 consecutive deltamotion cases were performed between 1/09/2010 and 31/12/2011. 52 cases were in primary operations and 14 were in revisions. In each case the surgical technique was modified and a trial reduction was performed using the pinnacle trial shell and liner. This enabled the surgeon to determine the optimum combined anteversion before insertion of the definitive component. In no case was a component sacrificed due to failure to achieve adequate press fit fixation. In each case the acetabular component was assessed to determine the angle of inclination and version. 32 cases had follow up of greater than 1 year and these patients were contacted telephonically and interviewed concerning adventitious noises.Introduction
Method
To assess the results of Revision Hip Surgery in which a less invasive technique was utilized in situations where a number of different options was available. The authors rely on an experience of 3,445 hip arthroplasties by a single surgeon over a period of 20 years, of which approximately 20% were revision cases. Of these 617 cases, we report on 175 in which a minimally invasive option was taken. This does not apply to the skin incision, as all cases were adequately exposed. We have adopted this term to describe cases in which a surgical options was taken that resulted in the least morbidity and the shortest surgical time. We postulated that would lead to the best outcomes with the least complications. Acetabular revisions: 1) Isolated polyethylene exchange. 2) Liner revision with cement technique in cases of cup malposition or poor locking mechanism. 3) Revision of cup with a primary prosthesis with significant medial bone loss. Stem revisions: 1) Cement on cement technique. 2) Strut graft and primary stem.Purpose of Study
Method
