There is minimal information on outcome of glenohumeral debridement for treatment of shoulder osteoarthritis (OA). The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of this procedure with or without acromioplasty /resection of clavicle in subjective perception of disability and functional range of motion and strength at one year following surgery. Prospectively collected data of patients with advanced OA of the glenohumeral joint who were not good candidates for shoulder arthroplasty due to young age, high activity level, or desire to avoid major surgery at the time of assessment were included. Arthroscopic debridement included removal of loose bodies, chondral flaps, and degenerative tissue. Resection of the lateral end of the clavicle or acromioplasty was performed as clinically indicated for management of osteoarthritis of the Acromioclavicular (AC) joint or subacromial impingement respectively. Disability at 12 months following surgery was measured by the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment form, Constant-Murley score (CMS), strength, and painfree range of motion in four directions.Purpose
Method
The introduction of alternate care provider roles is at the forefront of many new health human resource strategies and is one of the key approaches in reducing orthopaedic wait times in Canada. The present study was part of a formal evaluation of an expanded role for physiotherapists which included referral triage, comprehensive assessment and development of a management plan and post-surgical follow-ups. Specifically, we examined the efficacy and role of an Advanced Practice Physiotherapist (APP) with respect to reduction in wait times to care for patients with shoulder complaints referred to an orthopaedic surgeon with subspecialty in shoulder reconstruction. We used data of 100 consecutive patients seen by an APP in 2010 to examine the following: 1) type of diagnosis, 2) number of new investigations ordered, percentage of patients who needed a consultation with the surgeon, 3) and indication for surgery. Patients who were sent for a second surgical opinion, had a failed surgery in the affected side, had a motor vehicle accident or were a surgical candidate for stabilization or superior labral repairs were not included in the study and were directly booked for the orthopaedic surgeon. To compare change in waiting times, a random sample of 100 charts of patients seen in 2008 by an orthopaedic surgeon with a subspecialty in shoulder reconstruction were reviewed. The following time frames were compared between the surgeon and APP: T1: time from date of referral to date of consultation, T2: time from date of consultation to date of final diagnostic test, T3: time from date of consultation to confirmed diagnosis. Parametric and non-parametric analyses were performed as indicated by the distribution of data.Purpose
Method
