Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_4 | Pages 146 - 146
1 Feb 2017
McEntire B Jones E Bock R Ray D Bal B Pezzotti G
Full Access

Introduction

Periprosthetic infections are leading causes of revision surgery resulting in significant increased patient comorbidities and costs. Considerable research has targeted development of biomaterials that may eliminate implant-related infections.1 This in vitro study was developed to compare biofilm formation on three materials used in spinal fusion surgery – silicon nitride, PEEK, and titanium – using one gram-positive and one gram-negative bacterial species.

Materials and Methods

Several surface treated silicon nitride (Si3N4, MC2®, Amedica Corporation, Salt Lake City, UT), poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK, ASTM D6262), and medical grade titanium (Ti6Al4V, ASTM F136) discs Ø12.7 × 1mm were prepared or acquired for use in this well-plate study. Each group of discs (n=3) were ultrasonically cleaned, UV-sterilized, inoculated with 105Staphylococcus epidermidis (ATCC® 25922™) or Escherichia coli (ATCC® 14990™) and placed in a culture medium of phosphate buffered saline (PBS) containing 7% glucose and 10% human plasma on a shaking incubator at 37°C and 120 rpm for 24 or 48 hrs. Coupons were retrieved, rinsed in PBS to remove planktonic bacteria, placed in a centrifuge with fresh PBS, and vortexed. The bacterial solutions were serially diluted, plated, and incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hrs. Colony forming units (CFU/mm2) were counted using applicable dilution factors and surface areas. A two-tailed, heteroscedastic Student's t-test (95% confidence) was used to determine statistical significance.