Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 90-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 543 - 543
1 Aug 2008
Khan SA Kharwadkar N Rawes ML
Full Access

Introduction: The objective of our study was to analyse the incidence of subsidence of an uncemented, hydroxyapatite coated, collarless prosthesis (Orthodynamics) and its impact on postoperative mobility in patients with fractured neck of femur.

Methods: 22 sets of case notes and X Rays were available for patients treated with the Orthodynamics hemiarthroplasty between February and November 2005. The mean age was 78 years (range 61 – 91 years). Analysis of standardised anteroposterior radiographs in the immediate postoperative period and at a mean interval of 14 weeks (ranging from 6 weeks to 64 weeks) was undertaken. Subsidence was calculated by measuring the reduction in the distance between the tip of lesser trochanter and a fixed point on the prosthesis.

Results: 18 of the 22 (81.8 %) cases showed subsidence of the prosthesis. The mean subsidence calculated was 9.1 millimetres (range 1 to 25 millimetres) and it showed no relationship to the postoperative interval at which it was calculated. Impact of subsidence on mobility state was assessed. Post operative mobility status was available for sixteen patients. Nine patients showed no change in the mobility at follow up. This group had a mean subsidence of 4.3 mm. Seven patients had a worsening of their mobility state. The mean subsidence in this group was 10.1 mm.

Discussion: Our study shows significant subsidence of an uncemented, collarless, hydroxyapatite coated prosthesis used for hip hemiarthroplasty and an associated worsening of mobility. We suggest that further review of this prosthesis is done and other proven prostheses used for hip hemiarthroplasty after a fractured neck of femur.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 78-B, Issue 3 | Pages 410 - 412
1 May 1996
Rawes ML Dias JJ

We have reviewed 30 patients who had been treated conservatively for acromioclavicular dislocation between 1979 and 1982 at an average of 12.5 years after the injury. All except one had a good outcome as did five others contacted by telephone. In all patients reviewed the acromioclavicular joint remained subluxed or dislocated.

With conservative treatment a good long-term outcome can be expected without restoration of the anatomical configuration of the joint.