Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 86 - 86
1 Jan 2013
Barksfield R Rawal J Angardi D Bowden B Chojnowski A
Full Access

Background

Evidence concerning the management of dorsal fracture dislocation (DFD) of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) in the hand has been limited by small sample size and case heterogeneity within studies. This retrospective case control study examined clinical outcome of this specific subgroup managed by three different methods.

Methods

Patients undergoing fixation of unstable DFD of the PIPJ between March 2005 and August 2011 were identified from theatre records. A retrospective review of case-notes and radiographs was undertaken to determine fracture characteristics, fixation methods and clinical outcomes.


Introduction

Despite the multiple patho-aetiological basis of Hallux valgus (HV), corrective osteotomy is a common and globally performed orthopaedic procedure. Over-correction of the inter-metatarsal angle (IMA), however, is not without consequence. Through increased joint pressures, over-correction may predispose to joint degeneration. Hypothesizing that over-correction leads to an increase in intra-articular joint pressures, we constructed a mechanical simulation of the 1st metatarsal-phalangeal joint.

Methods

The vector forces of Flexor Hallucis Longus, Extensor Hallucis Longus, Extensor Hallucis Brevis and Adductor Hallucis, acting upon the 1st proximal phalanx were simulated with tensioned weighted rope. A Foley catheter balloon inflated to 1.5ml, simulated intra-articular distractive vector forces. The joint was freely mobile.

At 5° IMA intervals from 10° valgus to 15° varus, intrarticular pressures were recorded using a contact pressure (Graseby™, Hertfordshire, UK) transducer attached to a calibrated manometer (Digitech Instruments™, Ulhasnagar, India). At each angle, measurements were repeated five times with removal and recalibration of the pressure monitor after each measurement.