Background

Recent literature points out the potential interest of standing and sitting X-rays for the evaluation of THA patients. The accuracy of the anterior pelvic plane measures is questionable due to the variations in the quality of lateral standing and sitting X-rays. The EOS® (EOS imaging, Paris, France) is an innovative slot-scanning radiograph system allowing the acquisition of radiograph images while the patient is in weightbearing position with less irradiation than standard imagers. This study reports the “functionnal” positions of a 150 THA cohort, including the lateral orientation of the cups.

Introduction

The ceramic-on-ceramic strategy in acetabular revision faces potential limitations due to the femoral stem, as the implantation of ceramic ball head on a previously used taper is not recommended. Delta (r) ball heads with titanium sleeves have been proposed to avoid femoral revision. The study reports a minimum 3 years follow-up experience using this strategy.

Introduction

Wear performances and fracture toughness of the alumina-matrix composite (AMC) Biolox-delta(r) are pointed out in the literature. This study is a prospective monocentric evaluation of 32 and 36 mm AMC/AMC bearing surfaces.

Introduction: Computer assisted total hip replacement (THA) usually uses the anterior pelvic plane (plane of Lewinneck, APP) for reference because the anatomical landmarks are easy to access during the surgical procedure. However, a recent study shows the lack of correlation in between the Lewinnek angle in standing position (L) and the spinal radiological parameters for sagittal balance, specifically the incidence angle and the sacral slope. The anatomical variations of the anterior superior iliac spines account for the discrepancy. The authors propose here the assessment of the Lewin-nek – sacrum angle (LS) (anterior pelvic plane to the sacral endplate) Methods: 120 asymptomatic patients with THA had low dose lateral X-rays of the lumbo-pelvic area (Definium 8000, GE Healthcare ;dose 0,6 mSivert). The measurements of the sacral slope, incidence angle, and APP were done by two independent observers.

Results: The sacral slope and incidence angles were similar to other series. The APP was no clearly identified in 78 cases. The average L angle was −3° (SD 8°) in standing position, −23° (SD 11°) in sitting postion, and −2° (SD 8°) in lying position. The average LS angle was 47° (SD 13°). The geometrical relationship between the LS a ngle, the L angle and the sacral slope is reported.

Conclusion: THA stability supposes that the orientation of the acetabular component shall remain within extreme values in standing, sitting, and lying postures. The adjustment of the acetabulum takes into account the functionnal anatomy of the lumbopelvic area. The sacral slope is a reliable radiological reference and is related to the sagittal balance of the spine. The APP presents some interindividual variability and is poorly visible on the radiographs, but it is easily accessible during surgery. The author suggest using the Lewinnek sacrum (LS) angle for radiological planification and for surgical navigation procedures.

Purpose of the study: The analysis of hip prostheses often remains limited to standard x-rays taken in the upright position or a CT scan taken in the supine position. The EOS^® system enables imaging the entire body for head to foot in a lateral and anteroposterior views, in an upright or sitting position. The purpose of this work was to compare the standard radiographic work-up with the EOS system for the analysis of postural elements in patients with hip arthroplasty.

Material and method: This prospective study included 50 patients free of complications. The standard radiographic work-up included AP and lateral views in the upright and sitting positions. The standard then EOS imaging protocols were performed in two different locations. Images were acquired with the patients in a comfortable position: for the sitting position, the knees were flexed 90°. Two operators took measurements to be able to analyse reproducibility of the morphological parameters (incidence, sacroacetabular angle, and the positional parameters (version, sacral slope, Lewinnek angle, sagittal and frontal cup inclinations, pelvifemoral angle and orientation of the prosthetic neck on the lateral standing then AP sitting position). Pelvic rotation was determined on the AP view by comparative measurement of the projected width of the iliac wings in each pelvis. Hip extension reserve was calculated on the hyperextension lateral view.

Results: Reproducibility of position was excellent for different times and locations. Twelve hip (24%) presented significant reproducible rotation in the AP view; for eight of these hips (16%), the phenomenon disappeared in the sitting position. Four hips (8%) had pelvic rotation in the sitting position on the AP view. On the AP pelvic view in the sitting position, three patients had a femoral neck in functional retroversion while the anatomic femoral anteversion was normal on the scanner. The pelvic parameters were equivalent to those already described. The reproducibility of the measures was excellent between the standard x-rays and the EOS images with the exception of measurements involving the centre of the femoral head (incidence, pelvifemoral angle). It was easier to align the femoral axis on the EOS lateral images, particularly for additional calculation of extension reserve. The Lewinnek angle could not be measured in the sitting position in 32 hips (60%) because of insufficient resolution.

Conclusion: The overall evaluation of the pelvis and the subpelvic sector provides new information concerning the respective positions of the cup and the femur in functional situations.

Hip-spine relationships should be better investigated in THP as lumbo-sacral orientation in the sagittal plane plays a critical role in the function of the hip joints. Lateral X-rays showing spine and hips together in standing, sitting or squatting positions characterize the adaptations of the sagittal balance and the functionnal interactions between hips and spine.

Acetabular cup implantation has to be planned for frontal inclination, axial anteversion, and sagittal orientation. The later refers to the sacro-acetabular angle, key-point in the spine – hip relationships, and that is redefined by the surgeon at the time of implantation.

Usual standard CT-sections are biased for evaluating acetabular anteversion. The conventional CT procedure does not refer to the pelvic bony frame and. the measured anteversion is a projected angle on a transverse plane, depending on the pelvic adaptation in lying position. This measured angle is often considered as anatomical anteversion, leading to some confusion. Therefore this angle is only a “functional” supine anteversion, reflecting the anterior opening angle of the acetabulum in a specific position. According to the sagittal orientation of the pelvis, the true functional acetabular orientation can virtually be assessed in various postures from adjusted CT-scan sections.

The EOS^™ low irradiation 2D-3D X-ray scanner is an innovative technology already used for global evaluation of the spine. This technology allows simultaneously “full body” frontal and lateral X-rays with the patient in standing, sitting or squatting positions; a tridimensionnal patient specific bone recontruction can be performed and the cup anteversion can be directly assessed according to the position.

We investigated the lumbo-pelvic parameters influencing the tridimensionnal orientation of the acetabulum. We compared the data obtained for real postural situations using the EOS^™ system and the measures from plane X Rays and classical CT scan cuts replicating standing, and sitting positions.368 patients with cementless THP were involved in a prospective follow-up protocol. Sacral slope and pelvic tilt, incidence angle, acetabular frontal and sagittal inclination were evaluated on AP and lateral standard XRays. Functionnal anteversion of the cup has been measured using a previously described protocol with CTscan cuts oriented according to standing and sitting sacral slope. The mean difference between CTscan and EOS^™ system was 4,4° with comparable accuracy and reproductibility.

Sacral slope decrease in sitting position was linked to anteversion increase (38,8° SD 5,4°). Sacral slope increase in standing position was linked to lower ante-version (31,7° SD 5,6°). The anatomical acetabular anteversion, the frontal inclination, and the sagittal inclination were functional parameter which significantly varied between the standing, sitting, and lying positions. We noticed that the acetabular parameters in lying position highly correlated to the one in standing position, while poorly correlated with the one in sitting position. The difference between the lying and the sitting positions was about 10°, 25°, and 15° for the cup anteversion (CA) and the frontal and sagittal inclinations (FI,SI) respectively. The poor correlation between the lying and sitting positions suggests that the usual CT scan protocol is biased and not fully appropriate for investigating the cases of posterior THP dislocation and subluxation, which happen in sitting position. On the contrary, a strong correlation was observed between lying and standing measurements with all the acetabular parameters (CA,FI, SI), suggesting that the classical CT assessment of the cup anteversion remains an interesting source of information in case of anterior THP

Each patient is characterized by a morphological parameter, the incidence angle. High incidence angle is linked to low acetabular anteversion, increasing the instability risk and anterior impingement in sitting and squatting position; higher anteversion angles are observed in low incidence angle patients, leading to more internal rotation of the hip in any position.

Lumbo-sacral orientation in the sagittal plane influences the tridimensionnal orientation of the acetabulum, especially for anteversion. Aging of the hip-spine complex is linked to progressive pelvic posterior extension. Impingement phenomenons, orientation of stripe wear zones and some instability situations can be interpreted according to those data.

This study points out the opportunity to adjust the CT scan sections to the sacral slope in functional position for properly investigating the orientation of the acetabular cup, mainly in case of posterior dislocation.

In addition, the mobility of the lumbo-sacral junction could be a crucial parameter in the mechanical functioning and the stability of a THP due to its impact on sacral slope and pelvic tilt. Therefore we also recommend doing dynamic lateral radiographs of the lumbo sacral junction in standing and sitting position for planning a THP implantation in order to detect stiff lumbosacral junction or sagittal pelvic malposition.

Anterior approaches have been suggested for THP revision in order to reduce dislocation rate. However, the exposure is considered to be more strenuous. The goal of the study was to evaluate if anterior approach in lateral position may improve the exposure.

From 2005 to 2007, 47 patients underwent THP revision, 34 times on the acetabular side, 2 times on the femoral side and 11 patients had a bipolar revision. Mean age was 64 years and mean BMI was 23. Patients were positioned on the lateral side and had an antero-lateral approach. During the femoral procedure, the leg was placed in a sterile bag stuck on the lateral side in order to optimize the exposure by positioning the femur in adduction and posterior translation.

Acetabular and femoral exposures were achieved correctly in all the cases allowing to perform all the revisions using this technique and no additional approach was needed in any patient. Antero-posterior femorotomies were performed in 7 patients for stem replacement and cement extraction, without any specific complication. Early post-operative anterior dislocations occurred in 2 patients who underwent monopolar cup revision. Dislocation was explained by an excessive anteversion of the remaining stems. 2 patients had an incomplete and transitory sciatic deficiency due to excessive posterior translation of the femoral head in the sciatic notch.

Using this technique, THP revision seems to be achievable even in complicated cases requiring stem revision and femorotomy. Dislocation rate was low; however a larger cohort is needed to confirm these preliminary results.