Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 97-B, Issue 4 | Pages 516 - 519
1 Apr 2015
Ralte P Molloy A Simmons D Butcher C

The rate of surgical site infection after elective foot and ankle surgery is higher than that after other elective orthopaedic procedures.

Since December 2005, we have prospectively collected data on the rate of post-operative infection for 1737 patients who have undergone elective foot and ankle surgery. In March 2008, additional infection control policies, focused on surgical and environmental risk factors, were introduced in our department.

We saw a 50% reduction in the rate of surgical site infection after the introduction of these measures. We are, however, aware that the observed decrease may not be entirely attributable to these measures alone given the number of factors that predispose to post-operative wound infection.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2015;97-B:516–19.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 24 - 24
1 Jan 2014
Widnall J Ralte P Selvan D Molloy A
Full Access

Introduction:

Patient reported outcome measures are becoming more popular in their use. Retrospective scoring is not yet a validated method of data collection but one that could greatly decrease the complexity of research projects. We aim to compare preoperative and retrospective scores in order to assess their correlation and accuracy.

Methods:

36 patients underwent elective foot and ankle surgery. All patients were scored preoperatively using the SF-12 and FFI. Patients then recorded both PROMs retrospectively at the three month follow up (av. 139 days). Results were then analyzed for statistical significance.