header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
General Orthopaedics

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 33 - 33
1 Feb 2012
Karthikeyan S Rai S Drew S
Full Access

Introduction

In patients with shoulder pain one of the important initial determinations is to assess the integrity of the rotator cuff. Clinical examination is often inconclusive. Compared with MRI and arthrography, ultrasound allows dynamic evaluation, is non-invasive, less expensive, less time-consuming and more acceptable to patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of high resolution shoulder ultrasonography compared with arthroscopy in a series of consecutive patients with clinically suspected rotator cuff disease.

Materials and methods

100 shoulders in 99 consecutive patients with shoulder pain who had undergone standardised pre-operative ultrasonography and subsequent arthroscopy between May 2004 and March 2006 were included in the study. There were 53 males and 46 females with a mean age of 59 years. The mean time interval between the ultrasonographic and the arthroscopic examinations was 227 days. For full thickness tears ultrasonography showed a sensitivity of 100%, specificity 83%, positive predictive value 80%, negative predictive value 100% and accuracy 90%. Ultrasonography showed a sensitivity of 83% in detecting partial thickness tears, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 86%, negative predictive value 93% and accuracy 91%.