Purpose: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate a consecutive series of patients receiving metal on metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty with regards to outcomes and complications at minimum of 2 years follow-up.

Method: A prospective evaluation of all patients receiving hip resurfacing was performed including baseline evaluation (demographics, WOMAC, SF12, Oxford Hip Score) and minimum 2 year follow-up assessment (WOMAC, SF12, Oxford Hip Score, UCLA activity score, Patient Satisfaction, Complications). No patients were lost to follow-up.

Results: 143 hips in 127 patients received metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty. The mean age was 52 years and the primary diagnosis was osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis, Significant improvements were noticed across all baseline quality of life instruments (p< .05) with final mean WOMAC and Oxford Scores 95 (normalized 0–100). Final post-op satisfaction was mean 95 out of 100. Two patient sustained post-operative femoral neck fractures and required revision. An additional two patients required revision for ongoing hip pain. One patient sustained a sciatic nerve palsty and one additional patient required acetabular component repositioning on the same day as the index procedure. Revision procedures involved conversion of resurfacing femoral component to cementless total hip stem with large diameter metal head and preservation of acetabular component. Acetabular component survivorship is 99% and femoral component survivorship is 97% at 2 year follow-up.

Conclusion: Our short to midterm data, from an independant center, suggests excellent improvement in quality of life with high levels of patient satisfaction and postop acitivity level. Our comprehensive post-operative quality of life assessment demonstrates restoration of the hip to rival that of the normal non-arthritic hip joint. Complications unique to resurfacing arthroplasty occur and were not predictable based on pre-operative or intra-operative patient-specific features.

Purpose of study: To determine whether positioning the operated limb in flexion on a CPM machine reduces blood loss following uncemented total knee replacement. We also sought to determine whether limb arterial pressure, represented by ankle-brachial pressure index (ABPI), is affected by position of the limb.

Methods: We compared two groups of age and sex matched patients undergoing uncemented total knee replacement. The control group were treated in the postoperative period with the leg positioned flat in extension (48 patients). The CPM group were placed on a CPM machine at 90° of knee flexion for twelve hours immediately post-operatively (46 patients). Haemoglobin and haematocrit levels, blood transfusion requirement, length of hospital stay, range of motion and complications were compared.

In addition, we measured ankle and brachial pressures in a separate group of 39 patients with the limb in three different positions: flat with the knee in extension (ABPI 1), raised with the knee in extension (ABPI 2), and finally with the knee flexed to 90° (ABPI 3).

Results: The CPM group demonstrated a smaller drop in haemoglobin level (2.5 vs 3.1, p=0.013) and a reduced blood transfusion requirement (3 patients vs 14 patients, p < 0.05) in the post-operative period when compared to the control group. There was no significant difference in haematocrit drop, discharge range of motion, complications or length of hospital stay between the two groups.

ABPI measurements were calculated in the standard fashion, the mean ABPI in each limb position being 1.17 (ABPI 1), 0.87 (ABPI 2) and 0.83 (ABPI 3) respectively.

Conclusions: Short-term use of a CPM machine in the post-operative period reduces blood loss and appears safe following uncemented total knee replacement. We found limb arterial pressure to be reduced to the greatest extent with the limb in a position of 90° flexion at the knee, which may account for the reduction in blood loss seen in the CPM group.