The purpose of our study was three fold; firstly to assess the survival of closing wedge high tibial osteotomies (CWHTO), secondly to assess any clinical factors or radiological alignment which may affect survival and thirdly to assess the change in tibial inclination and patella height. Details of 51 patients undergoing CWHTO for varus gonarthrosis between 1999 and 2007 were assessed for age, BMI, gender, range of movement, meniscal integrity and grade of arthritis. Radiological evaluation included pre and post-operative femoro-tibial axis, tibial slope and patella height. Outcome was also evaluated by Oxford knee score and UCLA activity score. Failure was considered as conversion to arthroplasty.Aims
Methods
The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survival of OATS (Osteochondral Autograft Transfer System) (Arthrex, Florida, USA) grafting in our centre and evaluate the reasons for failure, the secondary aim was to ascertain if age, gender, BMI, site or size of OATS graft had any influence on outcome. Details of patients undergoing an OATS procedure from 1999 to 2008 were collected. Loosening, graft degeneration or subsequent surgery in the form of arthroplasty, revision OATS¯ or any other osteochondral procedure was considered as failure. Oxford knee score and UCLA activity score evaluated outcome.Aims
Methods
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty provides a good alternative to total knee arthroplasty in patients with isolated medial compartment osteoarthritis. There has been variable reporting in the literature as to whether age and sex affect the survival of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. The aims of this study were to determine whether age and sex were predictors of failure for the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.Background
Study aims
A number of studies have reported on the early failure of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. However, less evidence is available regarding the outcome following revision of failed unicompartmental knee prostheses to total knee arthroplasty. The study aims were to determine the time to failure and mode of failure for the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and to assess the short-term outcome following revision surgery.Background
Study aims
To assess the survival of revision knee replacements at our institution and to identify prognostic factors that predict failure in revision knee surgery. This was a retrospective review of 52 patients who had undergone revision knee surgery as identified by hospital clinical coding. Patient demographics, physiological parameters, reason for revision, type of revision implant and last date of follow up were recorded from the medical records. Implant survival was analysed both from the index primary procedure to revision and from definitive reconstruction at revision to re-operation for any cause.Aim
Materials and methods
We prospectively reviewed 2440 Cemented Anantomical (side specific) AGC total knee replacements performed on 2074 patients between 2002 and 2008 in our unit. The surgery was performed by a number of surgeons, both Consultant and Trainee grades. 1357 underwent PCL sacrificing surgery with implantation of Posterior Stabilised Femoral Implant (Cam and Grove) and 1083 underwent PCL retaining surgery with implantation of a Non-Stabilised Femoral Implant. The mean age at date of surgery for Posterior Stabilised prosthesis was 69 years (range 23-94) and Non-Posterior Stabilised prosthesis was 70 (range 33-97) with no significant difference p< 0.05 (C.I 95%). Follow up at present mean 4 years (range 1-6 years). 11 patients underwent secondary patella resurfaced for anterior knee pain at a mean of 1.5 years following the index procedure (range 0.5-4.1 years) with 6 patients reporting a marked improvement in anterior knee pain post operatively. 3 patients underwent removal of patella buttons for symptomatic loosening at a mean of 2.7 years follow index procedure. A total of 17 patients underwent a revision of either tibial or femoral components (0.7%). Indications for revision were infection in 11 patients, gross instability in 1 patient, periprosthetic fracture in 1 patient, persistent stiffness in 1 patient. 3 patients underwent revision for symptomatic loosening of the tibial component at a mean of 2.9 years (range 1.1-4.0). These short to medium term results for the Anatomic AGC total knee replacement agree with published results from other centres.
