Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 21 - 21
1 Jun 2016
Matharu G Berryman F Brash L Pynsent P Dunlop D Treacy R
Full Access

Introduction

We investigated whether blood metal ions could effectively identify bilateral metal-on-metal hip patients at risk of adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD).

Patients and methods

This single-centre, prospective study involved 235 patients (185 bilateral Birmingham Hip Resurfacings (BHRs) and 50 bilateral Corail-Pinnacles) undergoing whole blood metal ion sampling (mean time=6.8 years from latest implant to sampling). Patients were divided into ARMD (revised or ARMD on imaging; n=40) and non-ARMD groups (n=195). Metal ion parameters (cobalt; chromium; maximum cobalt or chromium; cobalt-chromium ratio) were compared between groups. Optimal metal ion thresholds for identifying ARMD patients were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, which compares the performance of different tests using the area under the curve (AUC) (higher AUC=more discriminatory).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Nov 2015
Matharu G Daniel J Ziaee H Pynsent P McMinn D
Full Access

Introduction

Little is known about variations in blood metal ions following bearing exchange for poorly functioning metal-on-metal hip replacements (MoMHRs). This study aimed to determine the changes that occur in blood and urine metal ion concentrations following MoMHR revision.

Methods

Between 2005–2012, a single-centre prospective cohort study was undertaken of patients with large-diameter MoMHRs and high blood metal ions requiring revision. Whole blood and urine were collected both pre-revision and post-revision for metal ion analysis.