Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_17 | Pages 45 - 45
24 Nov 2023
Dendoncker K Putzeys G Cornu O Nieuwenhuizen T Bertrand M Valster H Croes K
Full Access

Aim

Local antibiotics released through a carrier is a commonly used technique to prevent infection in orthopaedic procedures. An interesting carrier in aseptic bone reconstructive surgery are bone chips impregnated with AB solution. Systemically administered Cefazolin (CFZ) is used for surgical site infection prophylaxis however in vitro study showed that fresh frozen and processed bone chips impregnated with CFZ solution completely release the CFZ within a few hours. On the other hand irradiated freeze-dried bone chips, treated with supercritical CO2 (scCO2) have been shown to be an efficient carrier for the antibiotics vancomycine or tobramycine.

With this pilot study we wanted to investigate if CFZ solution impregnation of bone chips treated with scCO2 shows a more favorable release pattern of CFZ.

Method

The bone chips were prepared using the standard scCO2 protocol and were impregnated with 100 mg/ml cefazolin at different timepoints during the process: before freeze drying (BC type A), after freeze drying (BC type B) and after gamma-irradiation. 0.5g of the impregnated bone grafts were incubated with 5ml of fetal calf serum (FCS) at 37°C. At 2, 4, 6, 8 and 24h of incubation 200µl of eluate was taken for analysis. After 24h the remaining FCS was removed, bone grafts were washed and new FCS (5ml) was added. Consecutive eluate samples were taken at 48, 72 and 96h of incubation.

The concentration of CFZ in the eluates was measured with the validated UPLC-DAD method. Analysis was performed in triplicate.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Dec 2019
Duportail C Gerard M Kathleen C Putzeys G Thorrez L
Full Access

Aim

Allograft bone chips used in complex bone reconstruction procedures are associated with an increased infection risk. The perioperative use of systemic cefazolin is standard to prevent infection, but is less effective in the presence of avascular bone grafts. Bone chips have been described as a carrier for local delivery of antibiotics, but impregnation with cefazolin in a prophylactic setting has not been described. We aimed to obtain a prolonged cefazolin release from bone chips to maximize the prophylactic effect.

Method

Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were incubated for 20 min- 4h under atmospheric pressure or under vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analyzed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 96 - 96
1 Jan 2017
Thorrez L Putzeys G Duportail C Croes K Boudewijns M
Full Access

To prevent infections after orthopedic surgery, intravenous antibiotics are administered perioperatively. Cefazolin is widely used as the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. Systemic antibiotic therapy may however be less effective in longstanding surgery where bone allografts are used. Bone chips have been shown to be an effective carrier for certain types of antibiotics. Bone allografts impregnated with antibiotics may therefore provide the necessary local antibiotic levels for prophylaxis. To be efficient, a prolonged release from these bonechips is required. In contrast to vancomycin, for which prolonged release has clearly been proven effective from Osteomycin®, a commercially available impregnated bone allograft, no prolonged release bone chip preparations have been described so far for cefazolin. We developed a protocol to bind cefazolin in the porous structure of bone chips by means of a hydrogel composed of proteins naturally present in the human body.

Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were either incubated for 20 min- 4h or also treated with vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analyzed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection.

Soaking of bone chips without hydrogel resulted in a quick release of cefazolin, which was limited to 4 hours. When vacuum was applied elution of >1 µg/ml cefazolin was measured for up to 36 hours. Combination with collagen hydrogel resulted in a higher cefazolin concentration released at 24 hours (3.9 vs 0.3 µg/ml), but not in a prolonged release. However, combination of decellularized frozen bone chips with fibrin hydrogel resulted in an initial release of 533 µg/ml followed by a gradual decline reaching the minimal inhibitory concentration for S. aureus at 72 hours (1.7 µg/ml), while not measurable anymore after 92 hours.

Processed bone chips with hydrogel-cefazolin showed a markedly prolonged cefazolin release. When combined with a fibrin hydrogel, high initial peak levels of cefazolin were obtained, followed by a decreasing release over the following three days. This elution profile is desirable, since high initial levels are important to maximize anti-bacterial action whereas low levels of antibiotic for a limited time may stimulate osteogenesis. It is important that antibiotic release is ending after a few days as prolonged low levels of antibiotics are not clinically helpful and may lead to antibiotic resistance. Further preclinical studies are warranted to show effectiveness of hydrogel-cefazolin impregnated bone chips.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_23 | Pages 67 - 67
1 Dec 2016
Thorrez L Putzeys G Kathleen C Boudewijns M Christiane D
Full Access

Aim

To prevent infections after orthopaedic surgery, intravenous antibiotics are administered perioperatively. Cefazolin is widely used as the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. Systemic antibiotic therapy may however be less effective in longstanding surgery where bone allografts are used. Bone chips have been shown to be an effective carrier for certain types of antibiotics and may provide the necessary local antibiotic levels for prophylaxis. To be efficient a prolonged release is required. In contrast to vancomycin with proven efficient prolonged release from Osteomycin, this has not been described for cefazolin. We developed a protocol to bind cefazolin to bone chips by means of a hydrogel composed of proteins naturally present in the human body.

Method

Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were either incubated for 20 min- 4h or also treated with vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analysed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 145 - 145
1 Dec 2015
Putzeys G Croes K Boudewijns M Lambrecht S Voet P
Full Access

Vancomycin -impregnated bonechips from a human morselized femoral head allograft (BCs) are used in orthopaedic surgery to treat infections. Literature suggests that bonechips can be efficient vancomycin carriers, but due to the diversity in the type of bonechips, of impregnation and of method used to evaluate AB release, there are no uniform guidelines. We performed an in vitro study to examine the release of vancomycin from solution-impregnated deepfrozen processed bonechips. Quantification was performed using a fully validated chromatographic method. Results were compared with the elution-profile from Osteomycin®, a commercially available lyophilised processed bonegraft.

Different vancomycine impregnation-concentrations and impregnation-durations of frozen processed bonechips were investigated. After impregnation, bonechips were rinsed with saline in order to determine only the absorbed vancomycin. Elution was performed in newborn calf serum at 37°C. Eluted vancomycin concentrations were determined using Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection (UPLC-DAD). In addition an elution study was performed on the commercially available Osteomycin®, bone chips containing vancomycine.

Using processed frozen bonechips, an impregnation-concentration of minimum 100 mg/mL during 10 minutes delivers the desired local concentration (therapeutic window 25 – 1000 mg/L) for 3 days. Longer impregnation time at this concentration had no effect. Osteomycin®: delivers the desired local concentration for 8 days in our experimental setting.

Literature suggests that freshfrozen BCs can be used as carrier for vancomycin through solution-impregnation [1,3]. There is however much less information on the carrier-capacities of frozen processed bonechips, a type used in our hospital. Our impregnation-protocol was based on that of Mathyssen et al., but with direct quantification of elution concentrations. Impregnation with vancomycine 100 mg/mL during 10 minutes results in a release above the desired concentration for 3 days, which seems too short when treating bone-infections. Osteomycin®, shows a substantially longer elution [2].

Vancomycin-solution impregnation of frozen processed bonechips may not be sufficient to obtain the desired release-characteristics for the treatment of bone-infections.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 88-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages 100 - 100
1 Mar 2006
Isacker T Vorlat P Putzeys G Cottenie D Pouliart N Handelberg F Casteleyn P Gheysen F Verdonk R
Full Access

Introduction Osteoarthritis of the knee is a very common disease.In 80 to 90% of the cases it starts in the medial compartment and tends to remain there.Therefore, the Oxford Unicondylar Knee Prosthesis (OUKP) is a attractive device as it only replaces the diseased parts of the knee.For the past 15 years, the results of the OUKP, especially those achieved by the designer’s group, have mostly been very good. However, reports about long-term follow-up are scarce. For the designer group, Murray reported a 98% ten year survival. The only independent research bij Svard an Price and by Lewold of the Swedish Arthroplasty Study showed a good survival of 95% at 10 years and a poor survival of 87% at 8 years respectively.Our independent study reviews a ten year follow up of 149 OUKP’s.

Methods and Results One hundred forty-nine medial prostheses were implanted in 140 patients between 1988 and 1996. After a mean of 67 months 28 patients had died, without the need for revision. Seventeen prostheses were lost to follow-up. Revision surgery using a total knee prosthesis was performed in 16 cases. In 4 others, a lateral prosthesis was implanted subsequently to a medial one. One of these 4 was revised to a total knee prosthesis 6 years later. In another 4 cases, late complications of the meniscal bearing were treated with replacement of this bearing. In the group af patients older than 75 years, no revisions were recorded. The surviving prostheses were seen back after a mean of 126 months. The cumulative survival rate at 10 years was 82% for the whole population and 84% when knees with a previous high tibial osteotomy were excluded.

This difference is significant (p=0,0000).

Conclusion These results are in line with those of the Swedish arthroplasty register and compare poorly to the survival of total knee arthroplasty, therefore this prosthesis is not the first choice for most cases. Because it preserves a maximum of bone stock and is revised to a total prosthesis almost without difficulty, it is the first-choice implant for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis in the relatively young patient.The survival rate in the group of patients older than 75 years is as good as or better than that for total knee arthroplasty.Since the OUKP can now be placed minimally invasive, it might have its place in this subgroup. It should not be used in osteotomized knees.