We aimed to investigate the clinical consequences of intraoperative acetabular fractures. Between 2003 and 2012, a total of 3391 cementless total hip arthroplasties (THA) were performed at the Dept. of Orthopaedics, Innsbruck Medical University. Of those, a total of 160 patients underwent a CT scan within 30 days postoperatively. The scans of 44 patients were not suitable for analyse due to thick scan layers. Of the remaining 116 patients, 76 had a fracture. Reasons for CT-scans were suspected bleeding, hip pain, abdominal symptoms, etc.

The fractures included 59 isolated acetabular fractures, the rest of fractures was in the superior or inferior pubic ramus or the tuber ischiadicum.

Four cases out of the 59 acetabular fractures underwent revision surgery due to periprosthetic joint infection after 0, 2, 10 and 23 months. Four patients underwent revision due to cup loosening after 13 and 14 days as well as after 16 and 24 months. Of those, three showed a central acetabular fracture with protrusion.

In 33 of the remaining 51 patients, a minimum of 3 x-rays was available for migration analysis with EBRA. In 6 patients, the x-rays were not comparable to each other. The 27 remaining acetabular fractures were categorised according to AO classification in 62A1 (1; posterior wall), 62A2 (16; posterior column), 62A3 (6; anterior wall), and others (4). Four hips showed initial migration of more than 3 mm in the first 6 months. One had a central fracture, and was lost for follow-up after 8 months. Two had an anterior column fracture and showed no further migration after 6 months. One showed also a radiolucency of more than 2 mm in all 3 zones and was lost for follow-up.

We conclude that intraoperative acetabular fractures occur more often than we expected. Fractures of the acetabular ring involving one column do not seem to compromise the long-term stability of the implant. Central fractures required revision or showed loosening proved by high cup migration.

In revision total hip replacement, bone loss can be managed by impacting porous bone chips. In order to guarantee sufficient mechanical strength, the bone chips have to be compacted. The aim of this study was to determine in an in vitro simulation whether the use of a pneumatic hammer leads to higher primary stability than manual impaction. Bone mass characteristics were measured by force and distance variation of a penetrating punch, which was lowered into a plastic cup filled with bone chips. From these measurements bulk density, contact stiffness, impaction hardness and penetration resistance were calculated for different durations of impaction.

We found that the pneumatic method reached higher values of impaction hardness, contact stiffness and bulk density suggesting an increase in stability of the implant. No significant differences were found between the two different methods concerning the penetration resistance. The pneumatic method might reduce the risk of fracture in vivo, as force peaks are smaller and applied for a shorter period. Results from manual impaction showed higher variability and depend much on the experience of the surgeon. The pneumatic hammer is a suitable tool to standardise the impaction process.