header advert
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 86-B, Issue SUPP_II | Pages 128 - 129
1 Feb 2004
Prem M Aravidan M Mowbray M Newman-Sanders D
Full Access

The diagnosis and subsequent treatment of patients with “Anterior Knee Pain” remains a challenge and an enigma at times.

The 4 main parameters, which need to be assessed, are:

Bony anatomy of the PFJ

Cartilage structure within the PFJ

Tracking of the patella with active knee extension

Structure of the soft tissues in the extensor mechanism

While plain radiographs, CT scans and static MRI sans and arthroscopic assessments highlight some of the parameters none of them are comprehensive. The type of MRI scanning used in this study assesses all 4 parameters. The equipment required for resisted quadriceps contraction is inexpensive and readily available.

Material and Methods: 70 patients had dynamic MRI scans done over a period of 2 years. The study consisted of 3 parts:

Radiological diagnosis and grading of subluxation if present.

Clinical scoring of 26 patients who returned the questionnaires. Oxford, Lysholm and Tegner scores were used and correlated with the radiological scores.

Development of a Treatment Algorithm based o the scan results.

Conclusion: The Tibial Tubercle to Trochlear Groove Distance” (TTD) appears to be the single most significant parameter determining patellar tracking. Objective radiological assessment is possible under physiological loading, to differentiate tilt, subluxation and chondromalacia. We have proposed an algorithm for the surgical and non-surgical treatment of anterior knee pain. The pain scores did not show a significant correlation with the grading of subluxation.