Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters.

Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups.

Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001).

Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature.

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures seen in the emergency department. Closed reduction can provide definitive management when acceptable radiographic parameters are met. Repeated attempts of closed reduction are often performed to improve the alignment and avoid operative management. However, multiple reduction attempts may worsen dorsal comminution and lead to eventual loss of reduction, resulting in no demonstrable benefit. We hypothesize that compared to one closed reduction attempt, repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures has a low success rate in the prevention of operative fixation and improvement of radiographic parameters.

Initial and post reduction radiographs for all distal radius fractures managed at Vancouver General Hospital between 2015 and 2018 were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were based on the AO fracture classification and included types 23-A2.1, 23-A2.2 and 23-A3. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18, intra-articular involvement with more than two millimeters of displacement, volar or dorsal Barton fractures, fracture-dislocations, open fractures and volar angulation of the distal segment. Distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent two or more attempts of closed reduction were matched by age and gender with fractures that underwent one closed reduction. Radiographic parameters including radial height and inclination, ulnar variance and volar tilt were compared between groups.

Sixty-eight distal radius fractures that met study criteria and underwent multiple closed reduction attempts were identified. A repeated closed reduction initially improved the radial height (p = 0.03) and volar tilt (p < 0.001). However, by six to eight weeks the improvement in radial height had been lost (p = 0.001). Comparison of radiographic parameters between the single reduction and multiple reduction groups revealed no difference in any of the radiographic parameters at one week of follow up. By six to eight weeks, the single reduction group had greater radial height (p = 0.01) ulnar variance (p = 0.05) and volar tilt (p = 0.02) compared to the multiple reduction group. With respect to definitive management, 38% of patients who underwent a repeated closed reduction subsequently received surgery, compared to 13% in the single reduction group (p = 0.001).

Repeated closed reduction of extra-articular, dorsally angulated, displaced distal radius fractures did not improve alignment compared to a single closed reduction and was associated with increased frequency of surgical fixation. The benefit of repeating a closed reduction should be carefully considered when managing distal radius fractures of this nature.