Stemless prostheses are recognized to be an effective solution for anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) while providing bone preservation and shortest operating time. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) with stemless has not showed the same effectiveness, as clinical and biomechanical performances strongly depend on the design. The main concern is related to stability and bone response due to the changed biomechanical conditions; few studies have analyzed these effects in anatomic designs through Finite Element Analysis (FEA), however there is currently no study analyzing the reverse configuration. Additionally, most of the studies do not consider the effect of changing the neck-shaft angle (NSA) resection of the humerus nor the proper assignment of spatial bone properties to the bone models used in the simulations. The aim of this FEA study is to analyze bone response and primary stability of the SMR Stemless prosthesis in reverse with two different NSA cuts and two different reverse angled liners, in bone models with properties assigned using a quantitative computed tomography (QCT) methodology. Sixteen fresh-frozen cadaveric humeri were modelled using the QCT-based finite element methodology. The humeri were CT-scanned with a hydroxyapatite phantom to allow spatial bone properties assignment [Fig. 1]. Two implanted SMR stemless reverse configurations were considered for each humerus: a 150°-NSA cut with a 0° liner and a 135°-NSA cut with a 7° sloped liner [Fig. 2]. A 105° abduction loading condition was simulated on both the implanted reverse models and the intact (anatomic) humerus; load components were derived from previous dynamic biomechanical simulations on RSA implants for the implanted stemless models and from the OrthoLoad database for the intact humeri. The postoperative bone volume expected to resorb or remodel [Fig. 3a] in the implanted humeri were compared with their intact models in sixteen metaphyseal regions of interest (four 5-mm thick layers parallel to the resection and four anatomical quadrants) by means of a three-way repeated measures ANOVA followed by post hoc tests with Bonferroni correction. In order to evaluate primary stability, micromotions at the bone-Trabecular Titanium interface [Fig. 3b] were compared between the two configurations using a Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. The significance level α was set to 0.05.Background
Methods
The radius has a sagittal and coronal bow. Fractures are often treated with volar anterior plating. However, the sagittal bow is often overlooked when plating. This study looks at radial morphology and the effect of plating the proximal radius, with straight plates then contoured plates bowed in the sagittal plane. We report our findings and their effect on forearm rotation. Morphology was investigated using fourteen radii. Attention was made to the proximal shaft of the radius and its sagittal bow, from this 6, 7 and 8 hole plates were contoured to fit this bow. A simple transverse fracture was then made at the apex of this bow. Supination and pronation was then compared when plating with a straight plate and a contoured plate. Ten cadavers had the ulna plating at the same level. The effect on rotation of fractures plated in the distal third shaft was also measured A significant reduction in rotation was found, when a proximal radius fracture was plated with straight plate compared to a contoured plate: 10.8, 12.8, 21.7 degrees (p<0.05 for 6, 7, 8 hole plates). Forearm rotation was decreased further when a longer plate was used. Ulna or distal shaft plating did not reduce rotation. This study has shown a significant sagittal bow of the proximal shaft of the radius. Plating this with contoured plates in the sagittal plane improves rotation when compared to straight plates. Additional ulna plating is not a source of reduced forearm rotation.
