Aims

Despite recent advances in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, re-tear rates remain high. New methods to improve healing rates following rotator cuff repair must be sought. Our primary objective was to determine if adjunctive bone marrow stimulation with channelling five to seven days prior to arthroscopic cuff repair would lead to higher Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) scores at 24 months postoperatively compared with no channelling.

Purpose: The role of the posterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament (PMCL) in stability of the elbow remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of sectioning the PMCL on the stability of the elbow.

Method: Varus and valgus gravity-loaded passive elbow motion and simulated active vertical elbow motion were performed on 11 cadaveric arms. An in-vitro elbow motion simulator, utilizing computer-controlled pneumatic actuators and servo-motors sutured to tendons, was used to simulate active elbow flexion. Varus/valgus angle and internal/external rotation of the ulna with respect to the humerus were recorded using an electromagnetic tracking system. Testing was performed on the intact elbow and following sectioning of the PMCL.

Results: With active flexion in the vertical position the varus/valgus kinematics were unchanged after PMCL sectioning (p=0.08). However, with the forearm in pronation, there was a significant increase in internal rotation after PMCL sectioning compared to the intact elbow (p< 0.05) which was most evident at 0° and 120° degrees of flexion (p< 0.05). This rotational difference was not statistically significant with the forearm in supination (p=0.07). During supinated passive flexion in the varus position, PMCL sectioning resulted in increased varus angulation at all flexion angles (p< 0.05). In pronation varus angulation was only increased at 120° of flexion (p< 0.05). However, internal rotation was increased at flexion angles of 30° to 120° (p< 0.05). In supination, sectioning the PMCL had no significant effect on maximum varus-valgus laxity or maximum internal rotation (p=0.1). However, in pronation, the maximum varus-valgus laxity increased by 3.5° (30%) and maximum internal rotation increased by 1.0° (29%) (p< 0.05).

Conclusion: These results indicate that isolated sectioning of the PMCL causes a small increase in varus angulation and internal rotation during both passive varus and active vertical flexion. This study suggests that isolated sectioning of the PMCL may not be completely benign and may contribute to varus and rotation instability of the elbow. In patients with insufficiency of the PMCL appropriate rehabilitation protocols (avoiding forearm pronation and shoulder abduction) should be followed when other injuries permit.

Purpose: Ligaments and osseous constraints are the only static stabilizers in a healthy elbow. Following arthroplasty, the use of semi-constrained, or linked, implants provides a potential third static stabilizer. However, this constraint may increase loading on the prosthesis, and hence accelerate polyethylene wear. The presence of competent collateral ligaments and the radial head would be expected to improve elbow stability and decrease loading on the ulnohumeral articulation. This in vitro study determined the effects of the collateral ligaments, radial head, and implant linkage on kinematics and wear-inducing loads in total elbow arthroplasty.

Method: Eight cadaveric upper extremities (age 73.5yrs; 5 male), were tested using an elbow motion simulator. Humeral, ulnar, and radial components of an elbow arthroplasty were positioned using a computer-assisted technique. Varus-valgus and internal-external bending loads were measured during flexion using an instrumented humeral component. A tracking receiver attached to the ulna recorded its position during active and passive flexion in the vertical orientation, and passive flexion in the varus and valgus orientations. Kinematics and loading were measured with and without implant linkage, with an intact, resected and replaced radial head, and before and after sectioning of the collateral ligaments.

Results: There were no differences in the bending loads with the arm in the vertical orientation regardless of the status of the ligaments, radial head or implant linkage (p> 0.2). Radial head excision produced an increase in valgus angulation of the ulna (6.7±6.4°) but did not influence bending loads in the vertical orientation (p< 0.05). Loading was lowest with the unlinked implant, and with ligaments and radial head intact, with the arm in the valgus (1065±466Nmm) (p< 0.01) and varus (1333±698Nmm) (p< 0.05) orientations.

Conclusion: Our results show that the radial head is an important valgus stabilizer for the prosthesis employed in this investigation. Linkage of the articulation increases implant loading during passive flexion with the arm in the varus and valgus orientations, which may increase implant wear. This suggests that, when using prostheses of this design, linkage of the articulation may be unnecessary if adequate bone stock and ligaments are available, whilst preserving or repairing the collateral ligaments and preserving or replacing the radial head.

The traditionally accepted etiology of Scapholunate Advanced Collapse (SLAC) requires traumatic rupture of the scapholunate (SL) ligament which leads to abnormal wrist kinematics and thereafter severe localised degenerative arthritis of the wrist. The purpose of this prospective blinded kinematic analysis was to demonstrate that SLAC wrist also exists in the absence of trauma, and that abnormal carpal bone kinematics (specifically, decreased lunate flexion) is the initiating factor.

Patients with SLAC and no history of upper extremity trauma were compared with an age matched control group. All patients completed a questionnaire, personal interview, and a physical examination. A specialised flexion / extension radiographic jig was designed to control for the magnitude of force and position of the wrist in all planes.

A total of thirty-five subjects (sixty-nine wrists) were retained for the study, including thirty-three non-traumatic SLAC wrists and thirty-six control wrists. The non-traumatic SLAC group had significantly different radiographic kinematic analysis compared to the control group: increased Watson Stage (2 v 0), SL gap (3.4 v 1.8mm), revised carpal height ratio (rCHR) (77 v 68), SL angle in flexion (forty-one v twenty-eight degrees), and decreased radiolunate (RL) joint flexion (nine v twenty-seven degrees). Most importantly flexion of the asymptomatic non-degenerative wrist of the non-traumatic SLAC group was distributed 70% through the lunocapitate (LC) joint and only 30% through the RL joint (p< 0.05). Conversely, flexion was more evenly distributed in the control group (48% LC and 52% RL). Non-traumatic or developmental SLAC does exist. SLAC can thus be classified into non-traumatic (developmental) and traumatic types.

Non-traumatic SLAC begins with abnormal wrist kinematics. Over time restricted lunate flexion and normal scaphoid flexion leads to increased SL angles and eventual attrition of the SL ligament and predisposes patients to SLAC despite having no history of trauma.