Hemi shoulder arthroplasty is an attractive treatment for shoulder arthritis in particular if the natural glenoid is still intact. However, comparing the clinical results of hemi and total shoulder arthroplasty clearly shows lower survival for the hemi arthroplasty. One of the most common reasons for revision surgery is gleniod erosion, where the cartilage or bone is worn of. Aim of the current study was to analyse if the metallic articular surface of retrieved hemi shoulder arthroplasty is different from new implants. We hypothesized that the surface roughness will increased due the articulation and that metallic wear is detectable on the implants. Twelve retrieved and three brand new hemi shoulder arthroplasty were included. The surface roughness (Ra, Rz, Rmax, Rsk) was measured on different sites of the surface (center of the head and at the edge). The implants were further measured using a coordinate measuring machine to gain information on volumetric wear and geometrical alterations.

Compared to new implants the surface roughness on the retrievals was significantly increased (Tab. 1), except for skewness.

Although the roughness parameters within the retrieval group were generally higher at the center of the head compared to the edge, this difference was not significant. Apart from form deviations no volumetric wear was detectable on the heads (Fig. 1).

The current results indicate that the metallic articular implant surface changes in vivo and that the material is hurt due to the articulation against the softer cartilage or bone. Although it can't be finally clarified by that study, to what extend the higher roughness is taking part in the process of the clinically observed erosion of the gleniod, it can be assumed that an increased roughness is disadvantageous. Possibly, the observed surface alterations won't occur clinically with harder materiel (e.g. ceramic), but this even needs to be validated.