The TruFit® plug is a cylindrical scaffold designed to bridge defects in articular cartilages. It is a porous structure with interconnected pores, which gives it the capability of providing a framework for the ingrowth new tissue and remodelling to articular cartilage and bone.

The aim of this study was to assess the radiological incorporation of TruFit® Plugs using MRI. Between December 2007 & August 2009, 22 patients underwent treatment of a chondral or osteochondral lesion using one or more TruFit Plugs. At a minimum of 2 years, 10 patients (12 lesions) were MRI scanned and assessed with a modified MOCART Scoring system by an independent Consultant Musculoskeletal Radiologist. 8 patients were no longer contactable and 4 patients declined MRI as their knee was asymptomatic.

8 of 12 lesions showed congruent articular cartilage cover with a surface of a similar thickness and signal to the surrounding cartilage and reconstitution of the subchondral bone plate. 2 lesions had a thicker congruent articular surface with a similar signal to the surrounding articular cartilage without restoration of the subchondral bone plate. 2 lesions showed no graft incorporation at all and were filled with granulation tissue. Full incorporation of the bony portion of the plug had occurred in only 3 lesions with partial incorporation in 7 lesions. The remaining portion of these 7 lesions looked cystic on MRI.

The MRI appearances of the TruFit® Plug at 2 years are encouraging with the majority (83%) showing good restoration of the articular surface with tissue of similar thickness, congruity and signal as the surrounding articular cartilage. However complete incorporation of the TruFit® Plug is rare and cystic change is common. The significance of this cystic change is not clear.

Post-discharge surveillance of surgical site infection is necessary if accurate rates of infection following surgery are to be available. We undertook a prospective study of 376 knee and hip replacements in 366 patients in order to estimate the rate of orthopaedic surgical site infection in the community. The inpatient infection was 3.1% and the post-discharge infection rate was 2.1%. We concluded that the use of telephone interviews of patients to identify the group at highest risk of having a surgical site infection (those who think they have an infection) with rapid follow-up by a professional trained to diagnose infection according to agreed criteria is an effective method of identifying infection after discharge from hospital.