header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Applied filters
Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 74 - 74
1 Oct 2018
Hines JT Petis SM Amundson AW Sierra RJ Pagnano MW Abdel MP
Full Access

Introduction

Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been shown to significantly reduce transfusion rates in primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs), but data is limited in the revision setting. The purpose of the current study was to compare the rate of blood transfusions and symptomatic venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) in a large cohort of revision THAs treated with or without IV TXA.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 3,264 revision THAs (2,645 patients) between 2005–2014, of which 1,142 patients received IV TXA (1g at incision and 1g at closure). The mean age was 65 years with 49% males in the revision group with TXA, and 67 years with 45% males in the revision group treated without TXA. Outcomes analyzed included rates of transfusion and VTE (within 90 days) between cases treated with TXA and cases not treated with TXA. These comparisons were performed for the overall cohort, as well as within the subset of aseptic cases and septic cases. In order to minimize potential bias between these two subgroups, the analyses were weighted with inverse probability of treatment weights based on a propensity score which included age at revision THA, sex, BMI, ASA score, preoperative anticoagulation, and year of surgery. Mean follow-up was 2 years.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 15 - 15
1 Oct 2018
Petis SM Brown TS Pagnano MW Sierra RJ Trousdale RT Taunton MJ
Full Access

Introduction

The influence of surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) on scar healing and scar perception is unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients’ perception of their scar following direct anterior (DA) or posterior approach (PA) for THA utilizing validated scar assessment scales.

Methods

Fifty DA and 58 PA THA patients underwent scar assessment using the Patient Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) and Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scales (SBSES). Patients were included if they had at least 1-year follow-up, and had no previous surgery or intervention (i.e. radiation) around the assessed hip. The mean age was different between the cohorts (DA 67 vs PA 62 years, p=0.03). Other variables including gender, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, steroid use, diabetes, and smoking were similar (p>0.05 for all comparisons). All patients had subcuticular running closure, secured with skin adhesive glue. Mean time from THA to scar assessment was 3.1 and 3.6 years for the DA and PA groups, respectively (p=0.18).