The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the results of a preoperative surgical safety checklist by comparing the initial phase of implementation of the Time Out Procedure (TOP) to the results four years later. We compared the accuracy and acceptance of the TOP to determine whether surgical practice had changed. The TOP was initiated for all elective surgical procedures performed in Christchurch in 2004. An initial audit from September 2004 – April 2005 (Phase 1) was compared to one from October 2008-September 2009 (Phase 2) looking for an improvement in completion of the procedure. Variances were recorded and analysed within the categories of 1 System and process 2 Consent and limb marking 3Incorrect details and 4 Near miss. A questionnaire was also sent to all the surgeons to determine their attitude towards the TOP. Although the TOP was completed more often in Phase 2 (98%, p<0.001) there were more variances (9%, p<0.001). The commonest variance was due to the surgeon and assistant not being present at the TOP which was significantly worse than in Phase 1 (p<0.0001). The results of the surgeon questionaire showed that only 88% agreed that the TOP was valuable in preventing wrong site surgery. This surgical indifference to the TOP is difficult to explain especially when National and International agencies have stressed its role in preventing surgical error. The recent introduction of the expanded WHO Checklist should be ‘surgeon led’ to be effective.
It is now widely accepted that acute knee dislocations should be managed operatively. Most published studies are from outside the UK and from major trauma or specialist centres. The aim of the study is to report the functional outcomes of all patients presenting with an acute knee dislocation at our institution all of whom were surgically managed. The results were then compared to other published series. The hypothesis being that there would be no significant difference in the functional outcome scores between the groups. All patients presenting with an acute knee dislocation over the last 15 years were included in the study. The patients were followed up using functional assessment scores: Knee outcome score (ADL), Knee outcome score (sports), Tegner Lysholm Scores and overall Patient Satisfaction. The patients were classified according to the Schecnk classification of knee dislocations.Introduction
Methods
It is now widely accepted that acute knee dislocations should be managed operatively. Most published studies are from outside the UK and from major trauma or specialist centres. The aim of the study is to report the functional outcomes of all patients presenting with an acute knee dislocation at our institution all of whom were surgically managed. The results were then compared to other published series. The hypothesis being that there would be no significant difference in the functional outcome scores between the groups. All patients presenting with an acute knee dislocation over the last 15 years were included in the study. The patients were followed up using functional assessment scores: Knee outcome score (ADL), Knee outcome score (sports), Tegner Lysholm Scores and overall Patient Satisfaction. The patients were classified according to the Schecnk classification of knee dislocations.Introduction
Methods
Squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) hips is a clinical phenomenon that is concerning with regard to the long term performance of these joint devices. Investigations into the cause of the squeaking have focused on patient factors and demographics, surgical placement, and other non-ceramic components in the devices. The current study tests latest-generation CoC devices to measure the vibration modes and frequencies of the components individually as well as assembled in the complete surgical construct. Audio data from clinical cases of squeaking hips were analysed to determine the frequencies present. Retrieved CoC hips (n = 7) and never-implanted CoC bearing couples (n = 3) were tested in the laboratory for squeaking under loaded articulation. Bovine serum was introduced into the CoC articulation and dried to promote stick-slip motion at the articulation. Squeaking sounds from the in vitro tests were recorded for audio analysis. Low mass, high frequency-response ceramic shear piezoelectric accelerometers (PCB Piezotronics) were adhered to the hip components along multiple axes to measure vibrations during testing. Clinical audio shows that squeaking occurs at fundamental frequencies in the range of 1 to 3 kHz, with harmonics above the fundamental frequency. Retrieved CoC bearing couples squeaked at fundamental frequencies from 1.5 kHz to 3.8 kHz. Fourier Transform analysis of the audio closely matched the concurrent output from the accelerometers mounted directly on the ceramic components. This held true even in the absence of metal components in the system. With metal components included in the test construct (acetabular shell, acetabular cup, femoral stem), those components also vibrated at the same frequencies as the ceramic bearing couples, indicating that the CoC articulation is the source of the vibrations, with metal components conducting and emanating the sound. The never-implanted bearing couples were made to squeak and vibrated at fundamental frequencies ranging from 1 kHz to 8 kHz. Squeaking from CoC hips can be reproduced in the lab using components from clinical retrievals. Instrumentation of the explanted hips confirms that the vibration frequencies of the ceramic components themselves match the audible squeaking. The squeaking of ceramic components mounted with soft polymers and with no metal contact at any point indicates that the ceramic components themselves are the source of the clinical squeaking. The measured vibration of ceramic components in the audible range is an observation not predicted by modeling studies reported in the literature to date.
Femoro-acetabular impingement (FAI) is an increasingly diagnosed cause of hip pain in young patients. It may progress to cause labral injury and chondral damage within the hip. Surgery can be undertaken arthroscopically but is not universally available. Open approach to the hip with surgical dislocation, labral surgery and impingement lesion reduction is an acceptable alternative. Described by Ganz in 2001 the approach must conserve the postero-lateral blood supply to the femoral head and neck, to minimize the risk of Avascular Necrosis (AVN). Ganz recommended a sliding trochanteric osteotomy to widen access, and an anterior capsulotomy avoiding dissection postero-lateral to the femoral neck. To date there has been no published support for the Hardinge-type antero-lateral approach. We describe a series of 26 consecutive patients with FAI, all managed by open osteochondroplasty during 2008 via a modified anterolateral approach and capsule preserving exposure. Trochanteric osteotomy was not undertaken. The series contained 14 males and 12 females with mean ages of 33 and 29 respectively. Patients were assessed both clinically and using the Non Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). Assessments were undertaken pre-operatively and at 8 and 16 weeks post-operatively. The mean NAHS pre-op was 54. This improved to 87 at 16 weeks. 77% of our patients achieved a NAHS of 75 or greater indicating a good or excellent result. Three patients had poor outcome and progression of osteoarthritic symptoms. There were no complications from the osteochondroplasty and all patients were Trendelenberg negative by 16 weeks. We believe hip osteochondroplasty can be safely and effectively undertaken via an anterolateral approach, without a trochanteric osteotomy.
The purpose of this paper is to review the first six months experience of using the ‘Time Out’ procedure to avoid wrong site/side surgery and to evaluate the usefulness of this procedure in the routine preoperative check. Over a period of 18 months all elective surgical hospitals in Christchurch (both private and public) have coordinated to develop a pre-operative ‘Time Out’ check list to ensure that the correct surgical procedure is performed on the correct site. This procedure involves a final check of patient details, including surgical procedure and site, immediately prior to surgical preparation of the operative site. All forms during this six month period were prospectively collected and evaluated, specifically looking for system errors, which could proceed to wrong site surgery. There were a total of 10,330 procedures performed during this period within the three hospitals of which 9,098 (87.2%) completed time out forms were returned. There were no wrong side or wrong site surgeries performed during this six month period. However, there were three ‘near miss’ situations which were captured by the time out procedure. Analysis of the time out forms also revealed numerous consent issues, incorrect documentation and systems errors which could potentially have lead to serious errors in management and which will be discussed in detail. During this period there were 109 objections (1.2%) to the time out procedure. The time out procedure has been shown to be a useful tool for avoiding wrong site/side surgery and has gained acceptance amongst both medical and nursing staff as being a valuable check prior to surgery. It has accentuated the collective team responsibility for determining the correct site and side of surgery and as such is recommended for use in all centres to eliminate system errors resulting in incorrect site/side surgery.
The aim of the study was to determine the effects of 0 Ticron suture soaked in polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) on the histological and mechanical properties of healing meniscal tears in the red-white zone in an established animal model.
