The Australia and New Zealand Sarcoma Association established the Sarcoma Guidelines Working Party to develop national guidelines for the management of Sarcoma. We asked whether surgery at a specialised centre improves outcomes. A systematic review was performed of all available evidence pertaining to paediatric or adult patients treated for bone or soft tissue sarcoma at a specialised centre compared with non-specialised centres. Outcomes assessed included local control, limb salvage rate, 30-day and 90-day surgical mortality, and overall survival. Definitive surgical management at a specialised sarcoma centre improves local control as defined by margin negative surgery, local or locoregional recurrence, and local recurrence free survival. Limb conservation rates are higher at specialised centres, due in part to the depth of surgical experience and immediate availability of multidisciplinary and multimodal therapy. A statistically significant correlation did not exist for 30-day and 90-day mortality between specialised centres and non-specialised centres. The literature is consistent with improved survival when definitive surgical treatment is performed at a specialised sarcoma centre. Evidence-based recommendation: Patients with suspected sarcoma to be referred to a specialised sarcoma centre for surgical management to reduce the risk of local recurrence, surgical complication, and to improve limb conservation and survival. Practice point: Patients with suspected sarcoma should be referred to a specialised sarcoma centre early for management including planned biopsy.
In 2009, NICE CG 88 guideline on the management of non-specific low back pain was published. We looked at whether the introduction of these guidelines has had an impact on the management of back pain within primary care. Patients with non-specific low back pain (> 6 weeks but < 12 months) attending spinal outpatient clinic in UHL between 2008 and 2011 were asked to complete questionnaires. Two groups were studied, the first prior to the publication of NICE guidelines, and the second afterwards. Patients with radicular, stenotic and red flag symptoms were excluded. Key audited treatment standards assessed included manual therapy, acupuncture, focused structured back exercise program, supervised group exercise program and lastly referral to a combined physical and psychological treatment program. Compliance with not using X-ray or MRI and treatment modalities such as injections, laser therapy, ultrasound therapy, lumbar supports, traction and TENS therapy was assessed. Secondary outcomes included VAS (back, leg pain), Oswestry Disability Index, MSP and MZD. Primary outcomes analyzed using 1-sided Fisher's exact test and secondary outcomes using two sample t tests.Background
Methods
No previous studies have examined the physical
characteristics of patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES). We compared
the anthropometric features of patients who developed CES after
a disc prolapse with those who did not but who had symptoms that
required elective surgery. We recorded the age, gender, height,
weight and body mass index (BMI) of 92 consecutive patients who
underwent elective lumbar discectomy and 40 consecutive patients who
underwent discectomy for CES. On univariate analysis, the mean BMI
of the elective discectomy cohort (26.5 kg/m2 (16.6 to
41.7) was very similar to that of the age-matched national mean
(27.6 kg/m2, p = 1.0). However, the mean BMI of the CES
cohort (31.1 kg/m2 (21.0 to 54.9)) was significantly
higher than both that of the elective group (p <
0.001) and the
age-matched national mean (p <
0.001). A similar pattern was
seen with the weight of the groups. Multivariate logistic regression
analysis was performed, adjusted for age, gender, height, weight
and BMI. Increasing BMI and weight were strongly associated with
an increased risk of CES (odds ratio (OR) 1.17, p <
0.001; and
OR 1.06, p <
0.001, respectively). However, increasing height
was linked with a reduced risk of CES (OR 0.9, p <
0.01). The
odds of developing CES were 3.7 times higher (95% confidence interval
(CI) 1.2 to 7.8, p = 0.016) in the overweight and obese (as defined
by the World Health Organization: BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) than
in those of ideal weight. Those with very large discs (obstructing
>
75% of the spinal canal) had a larger BMI than those with small
discs (obstructing <
25% of the canal; p <
0.01). We therefore
conclude that increasing BMI is associated with CES.