Several surgical approaches are available for elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis. While posterior surgical approaches are the most common, interest in a direct anterior (Hueter) approach is increasing because of alleged advantages in convalescence. However, no studies have examined differences in patient-reported global and condition-specific measures of health across multiple institutions. The ongoing Pulmonary Embolism Prevention after Hip and Knee Replacement (PEPPER) study is a PCORI-funded multicenter pragmatic clinical trial randomizing patients to three different antithrombotic regimens. We analyzed operative data from PEPPER to compare pre-post changes in validated patient-reported outcome measures after THA based on surgical approach. Participants (age 21 or older) were recruited from 27 academic medical centers for the PEPPER trial. Eligibility screening, baseline measures, and operative detail were entered into a central database with standardized blinded post-operative data collection protocol. We included participants undergoing elective primary total hip arthroplasty, excluding those undergoing revision, resurfacing, bilateral procedures, on chronic preoperative anticoagulation, with a recent history of gastrointestinal, cerebral, or other hemorrhage, defective hemostasis, or uncontrolled hypertension. Participating centers reported the operative approach as “Posterior”, “Transgluteal”, or “Anterior”. The brief version of the Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS Jr.) and the Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Global Survey (PROMIS10) were ascertained pre-operatively, and at 1, 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Mixed-effects linear regression was used to compare difference in patient-reported outcomes over time based on surgical approach, adjusting for baseline measures of health outcome, patient age, sex, race, ethnicity, BMI, comorbidity, education, work status, alcohol use, and smoking status.Introduction
Methods
Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is a high value elective orthopaedic procedure, the indications for which may vary among surgeons as well as patients. The utilization of other discretionary procedures is known to be influenced by the availability of qualified surgeons. We investigated the existence of a correlation between geographic variation in TJA utilization and the regional density of arthroplasty surgeons. The number of Medicare-funded total hip (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasties performed in predetermined geographic referral regions were obtained from the Dartmouth Atlas for 2012. The number of surgeons specializing in total joint arthroplasty in each respective region was derived from the AAHKS membership list. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship between number of arthroplasties performed per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries and the number of AAHKS-members per 100,000 beneficiaries in each Hospital Referral Region (HRR). For THA in aggregate, a positive correlation was found between number of THA performed per 1,000 beneficiaries and increasing TJA surgeon density. Positive correlations were also noted when HRRs were stratified by size from 50,000 to 250,000 beneficiaries. The number of THA performed per 1,000 beneficiaries in regions with AAHKS members was greater than in regions without (4.03 vs 3.29; p=0.008). In contrast, there was no correlation between the rate of TKA utilization and HRR surgeon density, and no consistent relationship between TKA rate and HRRs stratified by size. Likewise, there was no difference in the rate of TKA between HRRs with and without AAHKS members (8.48 vs 8.84; p=0.18). The frequency of THA positively correlates with AAHKS surgeon density in all but the largest HRRs and was greater in regions with AAHKS members than in those without. Such relationships were not apparent for TKA utilization. These data may have important implications for more cost-effective utilization of THA.
