The direct anterior (DA) approach for total hip arthroplasty has demonstrated successful short term outcomes. However, debate remains about which patients are candidates fo this approach. To our knowledge, there are no studies which specifically investigate short-term outcomes in obese versus non-obese patients undergoing THA through a DA approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate complication rates and short term outcomes of obese, pre-obese, and normal BMI patients undergoing THA through DA approach. A retrospective review of 151 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral THA through a DA approach for osteoarthritis or avascular necrosis was performed after IRB approval. Forty patients had a normal BMI, 54 were pre-obese, and 57 were obese by WHO classification (37 class I obese, 12 class II obese, and 8 class III obese). Electronic and paper charts were reviewed to determine differences in surgical time, length of stay, disposition, wound and major complications, and short term outcome measures.Introduction
Methods
The direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty has shown to improve multiple early outcome measures. However, criticisms suggest improved results may be due to selection bias and protocol changes. This study compares mini-incision posterior approach to direct anterior approach performed by one surgeon, controlling for influences other than the surgical approach itself. An IRB approved retrospective review was conducted on 150 consecutive primary total hip arthroplasty patients; the first 50 from mini-incision posterior approach, followed by 50 during the learning curve for direct anterior approach, and 50 subsequent cases when the approach was routine. Peri-operative protocols were alike for all groups. Data collection included patient demographics, anesthesia, operative times, discharge disposition, length of stay, VAS pain scores, progression from assistive devices, and narcotic use at follow-up of two and six weeks. Statistical methods included Wilcoxon rank sum, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, fisher exact and t-tests. P-value of <.05 was considered significant.Introduction:
Methods:
