Partial facetectomies with pedicle screw instrumentation is widespread and a well described technique for achieving posterior correction of scoliosis. Newton et al. first described the use of the UBS in the posterior correction of AIS in 2014. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the UBSPO in achieving posterior correction in Type1 AIS as compared to the traditional partial facetectomies. Aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of USBPO in achieving posterior correction in Type 1 AIS as compared to partial facetectomies. A retrospective review of 40 patients with type 1 AIS who had undergone a posterior correction of scoliosis between 2010 and 2016 was performed. Group A (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients that had partial facetectomies while Group B (n=20) consisted of consecutive patients having UBSPO. Both groups were matched for demographic parameters. Pre and post-operative radiographic parameters and operative data in both groups were compared. The Mann-Whitney U test was used for statistical analysis.Background
Methods
Chronic low back pain (CLBP) can be constant or episodic. Fluctuations are common. We present two different pictures of the CLBP experience; timelines illustrating back pain over time and ‘web diagrams’ showing a snapshot of a phase in time. Semi structured interviews from 34 participants from the UK BeST trial included timelines drawn collaboratively by the researcher and participant. Symptoms, events, treatment and consultations were arranged chronologically along a timeline. Initial thematic analysis on 63 interviews gave bio-psychosocial themes that were spoken about in an integrated way. Further analysis explored these interactions between themes. Interactions were classified as; helpful to recovery, unhelpful or mixed. Web diagrams were drawn for each interview and classified as Dense- mostly unhelpful interactions, Open – a combination of helpful and unhelpful interactions and Sparse – mostly helpful interactions.Background and Purpose
Methods
The available treatments for NSLBP (Non-Specific Low Back Pain) provide, typically, small to moderate average benefits to patients. The aim of this pilot cluster RCT was to test the hypothesis that the use of a patient decision aid together with an informed shared decision making consultation would produce better outcomes in satisfaction with treatment at four month follow-up. We developed a DSP (Decision Support Package). We randomised the physiotherapists and trained those in the intervention arm in informed shared decision making and communication. Participants were recruited from a local physiotherapy department and those allocated to an appointment with an intervention therapist were sent a copy of the DSP in the post. Participants then attended their appointment as usual.Background
Methods
We have developed a LBP (low back pain) repository with IPD (individual patient data) from therapist-delivered intervention RCT's from various institutions, nationally and internationally (19 trials, 9328 patients). We will perform IPD meta-analyses to identify and determine the most effective and cost-effective treatments for subgroups of patients. Disability due to LBP is a key outcome of interest. However, there was no common disability measurement that was used in all the RCT's. We report here our assessment as to whether different disability measures are sufficiently comparable to allow pooling across trials. We used data from seven trials (n = 5015 patients) that had at least two of the following measurements: RMDQ (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire), MVK (Modified Von Korff disability score), physical component scale of SF-12/36, Patient Specific Functional Scale, and Hannover Functional Ability Questionnaire. Within each trial, the change score between baseline and short-term follow-up was computed. These change scores were then converted from one outcome measure to another with linear regression and ridge-reroughed linear models. They were also tested for correlation and responsiveness (the ability to detect changes in condition, measured by standardised response means).Background
Method
Yellow flags are psychosocial indicators which are associated with a greater likelihood of progression to persistent pain and disability and are referred to as obstacles to recovery. It is not known how effective clinicians are in detecting them. Our objective was to determine if clinicians were able to detect them in secondary care. 111 new referrals in a specialist spine clinic completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and a range of other validated questionnaires including the yellow flag questionnaire adapted from the psychosocial flags framework. Clinicians blinded to the patient data completed a standardized form to determine which and how many yellow flags they had identified.Introduction
Methods
