Despite the multiple patho-aetiological basis of Hallux valgus (HV), corrective osteotomy is a common and globally performed orthopaedic procedure. Over-correction of the inter-metatarsal angle (IMA), however, is not without consequence. Through increased joint pressures, over-correction may predispose to joint degeneration. Hypothesizing that over-correction leads to an increase in intra-articular joint pressures, we constructed a mechanical simulation of the 1st metatarsal-phalangeal joint. The vector forces of Flexor Hallucis Longus, Extensor Hallucis Longus, Extensor Hallucis Brevis and Adductor Hallucis, acting upon the 1st proximal phalanx were simulated with tensioned weighted rope. A Foley catheter balloon inflated to 1.5ml, simulated intra-articular distractive vector forces. The joint was freely mobile. At 5° IMA intervals from 10° valgus to 15° varus, intrarticular pressures were recorded using a contact pressure (Graseby™, Introduction
Methods
The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of patients' shoe size as a predictor of femoral component size of Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR). A retrospective study was conducted to identify the correlation between patients' shoe size (British system) and the femoral component size. After excluding patients who died (n=2) and patients in whom the implanted femoral component size was inaccurate (n=13), the remaining cases (93 UKR in 88 patients) formed the study sample. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed to determine femoral component fit. We found positive correlation between shoe size and femoral component size. In females; a shoe size from 2.5 to 6 predicted a small femoral component and shoe size from 6.5 to 8.0 predicted a medium femoral component. In males, a shoe size from 6 to 9.5 predicted a medium femoral component and a shoe size from 10 to 13 predicted a large femoral component. This relation predicted the femoral component size accurately in 80% of cases. In the rest of cases, the prediction was only one size smaller or larger than the ideal size. A subgroup analysis, after excluding patients who changed their shoe size during adulthood after foot surgery or pathology (n=20), showed an accuracy rate of 81%. Shoe size is a simple method that predicts femoral component size more accurately than other methods currently used such as templating, tibial component size and height based on gender.
A comprehensive review of the literature relating to the pathology and management of the diabetic foot is presented. This should provide a guide for the treatment of ulcers, Charcot neuro-arthropathy and fractures involving the foot and ankle in diabetic patients.
Advances in the design of the components for total ankle replacement have led to a resurgence of interest in this procedure. Between January 1999 and December 2004, 16 patients with a failed total ankle replacement were referred to our unit. In the presence of infection, a two-stage salvage procedure was planned. The first involved the removal of the components and the insertion of a cement spacer. Definitive treatment options included hindfoot fusion with a circular frame or amputation. When there was no infection, a one-stage salvage procedure was planned. Options included hindfoot fusion with an intramedullary nail or revision total ankle replacement. When there was suspicion of infection, a percutaneous biopsy was performed. The patients were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Of the 16 patients, 14 had aseptic loosening, five of whom underwent a revision total ankle replacement and nine a hindfoot fusion. Of the two with infection, one underwent fusion and the other a below-knee amputation. There were no cases of wound breakdown, nonunion or malunion. Management of the failed total ankle replacement should be performed by experienced surgeons and ideally in units where multidisciplinary support is available. Currently, a hindfoot fusion appears to be preferable to a revision total ankle replacement.
The resurgency of ankle replacement in the last 10 years has prompted a need for effective management of failing prostheses. We present the early to mid-term results for revision surgery of 17 arthroplasties in 17 patients from our tertiary referral centre. Between 1999 and 2004, two Consultant Foot and Ankle Surgeons revised failing ankle arthroplasties in 17 patients (age range 51–74 years). All patients were assessed with tissue cultures and histology that were harvested at the time of surgery and managed in conjunction with a specialist Bone Infection Unit. Intraoperative frozen section was used to aid management, but usually pre-operative decisions had been made which included
one or two stage reimplantation fusion with an intramedullary nail or Ilizarov frame amputation, and Ilizarov fusion combined with proximal tibial lengthening for excessive bone loss. Many of the patients had had previous “revision surgery” such as change of meniscal components, arthroscopic debridements and excision of impingeing osteophytes. Indications for implantation had been osteoarthritis in 59%, rheumatoid arthritis in 18% and post-trauma in 23%. Heel shift procedures to correct malalignment had been performed in 12%. The implants comprised 15 Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacements (STAR), one Agility and one Buechel-Pappas. Three patients had fractured malleoli secondary to bone loss. Cultures and histology confirmed the presence of infection in 24% (defined as positive histology and more than 2/6 positive cultures) with aseptic loosening in the remainder. One infected patient underwent amputation at his request. Six non-infected patients had successful revision of two or three components, one infected patient had Ilizarov fusion and lengthening. The remainder underwent successful hindfoot fusion over a locked intramedullary nail, even in the presence of infection, with suppression to union.
We reviewed the outcome of 116 primary cemented Omnifit 7000 series total knee arthroplasties implanted into 108 patients over a period of two years with a mean follow up of 68 months (range, 48–90). During the review period, 12 patients died and 8 patients were lost to follow up (24 knees). The mean Knee Society score postoperatively at review was 86 (range, 65 to 95). The mean functional score at review was 76 (range, 60 to 100). The mean range of motion at review was 100 degrees (range, 85 to 115). Radioluscent lines greater than or equal to 1mm in width were present in 9 (10%) of the femoral views, 12 (14%) of the tibial AP views, 4 (4%) of the tibial lateral views and there was no evidence of progression of the radioluscent lines. There were three revisions; one because of an early deep joint infection, on due to instability in the AP plane and one due to aseptic loosening. The clinical and radiographic results with a minimum five year follow up show very satisfactory results. The Omnifit 7000 series provides results, which compare well with other cemented arthroplasties in the medium term.
Our aim was to determine if a tourniquet placed on the ankle has any advantage in forefoot surgery over the position on the midcalf. We randomised 30 patients who were undergoing forefoot surgery under under local anaesthesia into two groups. One had a tourniquet on the ankle and the other on the mid calf. All calf and ankle tourniquets were inflated to 100 mm Hg above the systolic pressure, just before the surgical procedure. The blood pressure, pulse and level of pain were recorded at intervals of five minutes during the operation. The surgeon evaluated the quality of the anaesthesia, the bloodless field, and the site of the tourniquet. The patients tolerated the tourniquet on the ankle much more. Both the tourniquet positions gave good operative fields, however the use of the ankle tourniquet was less painful at 5,10,20 and 30 minutes after the operation had started (p<
0.01). Physiological parameters were better in the ankle group. We conclude that the ankle tourniquet gives a good bloodless field and provides improved pain tolerance for forefoot surgery carried out under local anaesthesia.