The aim of this study is to clarify the implication of ciliary pathway on the onset of the spinal curvature that occurs in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients through functional studies of two genes: POC5 and TTLL11. Since the genetic implication for AIS is accepted, many association and candidate gene analysis revealed the implication of ciliary genes. The characterisation of these two proteins was assessed by qPCR, WB and immunofluorescence in vitro using control cells and cells derived from AIS patients. The impact of genetic modification of these genes on the functionality of the proteins in vitro and in vivo was analysed in zebrafish model created by CRISPR/Cas9 using microCT and histologic analysis. Our study revealed that mutant cells, for both gene, were less ciliated and the primary cilia was significantly shorter compared to control cells. We also observed a default in cilia glutamylation by immunofluorescence and Western Blot. Moreover, we observed in both zebrafish model, a 3D spine curvature similar to the spinal deformation in AIS. Interestingly, our preliminary results of immunohistology showed a retinal defect, especially at the cone cell layer level. This study strongly supports the implication of the ciliary pathway in the onset of AIS and this is the first time that a mechanism is described for AIS. Indeed, we show that shorter cilia could be less sensitive to environmental factors due to lower glutamylation and result in altered signalling pathway. Identifying the biological mechanism involved is crucial for elucidating AIS pathogenesis.
Spinal fusion remains the gold standard in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. However, anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is gaining widespread interest, despite the limited data on its efficacy. The aim of our study was to determine the clinical efficacy of AVBT in skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis. All consecutive skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with AVBT enrolled in a longitudinal, multicentre, prospective database between 2013 and 2016 were analyzed. All patients were treated by one of two surgeons working at two independent centres. Data were collected prospectively in a multicentre database and supplemented retrospectively where necessary. Patients with a minimum follow-up of two years were included in the analysis. Clinical success was set a priori as a major coronal Cobb angle of < 35° at the most recent follow-up.Aims
Methods
From the many human studies that attempt to identify genes for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), the view emerging is that AIS is a complex genetic disorder with many predisposing genes exhibiting complex phenotypes through environmental interactions. Although advancements in genomic technology are transforming how we undertake genetic and genomic studies, only some success has been reached in deciphering complex diseases such as AIS. Moreover, the present challenge in AIS research is to understand the causative and correlative effects of discovered genetic perturbations. An important limitation to such investigations has been the absence of a method that can easily stratify patients with AIS. To overcome these challenges, we have developed a functional test that allows us to stratify patients with AIS into three functional subgroups, representing specific endophenotypes. Interestingly, in families with multiple cases of AIS, a specific endophenotype is shared among the affected family members, indicating that such a transmission is inherited. Moreover, increased vulnerability to AIS could be attributable to sustained exposure to osteopontin (OPN), a multifunctional cytokine that appears to be at the origin of the Gi-coupled receptor signalling dysfunction discovered in AIS. We examined the molecular expression profiles of patients with AIS and their response to OPN. Osteoblasts isolated from patients with AIS were selected for each functional subgroup and compared with osteoblasts obtained from healthy matched controls. We used the latest gene chip human genome array Affymetrix (HuU133 Plus 2.0 array) that allows for the analysis of the expression level of 38 000 well characterised human genes. Raw data were normalised with robust multiarray analysis method. Statistical analysis was done by the EB method with FlexArray software. Selection criteria for in-depth analysis include the magnitude of change in expression (at least □} 3-fold) and 5% false discovery rate as stringency selection. Validation of selected candidate genes was done by qPCR and at the protein level by Western blot and ELISA methods. Plasma OPN concentrations were measured by ELISA on a group of 683 consecutive patients with AIS and were compared with 262 healthy controls and 178 asymptomatic offspring, born from at least one scoliotic parent, and thus considered at risk of developing the disorder. The regulation of OPN signalling pathway in normal and AIS cells were validated in vitro by cellular dielectric spectroscopy (CDS).Introduction
Methods
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common form of spinal deformity. It occurs mainly in girls and progresses during pre-pubertal and pubertal growth, which is a crucial period for bone mass acquisition. The cause and molecular mechanisms of AIS are not clear; at present the consensus is that AIS has a multifactor cause, with many genetic factors. During the past 5 years, considerable effort has been devoted to identify a gene or genes that cause a predisposition to AIS. Many loci for this disorder have been mapped to different chromosome regions, but no genes have been clearly identified as being responsible for AIS, and, most importantly, the resulting protein defects remain to be shown. We aimed to identify the gene(s) that could be involved in AIS and to validate their involvement by both genetic and functional analyses. A large multiplex AIS French family was chosen for this study on the basis of clinical and radiological data. Whole genome genotyping of the 20 members of this family led to the mapping of a dominant disease-causing gene to two critical genomic intervals (Edery and colleagues, Introduction
Methods
