Aim of this prospective, randomized study is to introduce and compare a new technique of reduction of the anterior dislocation of the shoulder with the “Hippocrates” and “Kocher” methods, as far as its efficacy, safety and intensity of the pain felt by the patient during the reduction, are concerned. This is the first reported prospective, randomized comparative study of three reduction techniques of anterior dislocations of the shoulder. 154 patients suffering from acute anterior shoulder dislocation participated in the study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of the three study groups (New, “Hippocrates” and “Kocher”) and underwent reduction of their dislocation performed by residents orthopaedic surgeons. The groups were statistically comparable (age, male/ female ratio, mechanism of dislocation, mean time interval between injury and first attempt of reduction). Reduction was achieved with the “Fares” method in 88.6%, with the “Hippocrates” in 72.5% and with the “Kocher” in 68% of the patients. This difference was statistically significant, favoring the new method (p=0.033). The mean duration of the reduction (p=0.000) and the mean reported by the patients VAS with the new method (p=0.000) were also statistically significantly lower than those of the other methods. No complications were noted in any group. The new method seems to be more effective, faster and less painful method of reduction of the anterior shoulder dislocation, when compared with the “Hippocrates” and the “Kocher” methods. It is easily performed by only one physician and it is not more morbid that the other two methods.
The aim of this study was to extend the evaluation of the course of bone turnover markers over a longer period (12 postoperative months) following a TJA, and to assess the postoperative course for two of them (RANKL and Osteoprotegerin) for the first time.
The adolescents were divided in two groups. In the first group (n=47) were included adolescents wearing the brace for over two years (mean time of application 3, 3 years) and the second group (n=44) included adolescents, which have been treated with Boston brace for less than two years (mean time of application 1, 2 years). Every child completed a detailed questionnaire (SRS-22) concerning the evaluation of function, pain, self image, mental health and satisfaction with management. Both groups were comparable according to age and degrees of scoliotic curve.
Patients were divided into two groups according to the type of hip fracture. Group 1 included 299 patients with subcapital fractures, 61 men and 238 women and the second group 353 patients with intertrochanteric fractures, 98 men and 298 women. Patients’ demographics concerning age, sex, weight, height on admission at the hospital were compared between groups.
The aim of this paper is to present our experience from the surgical treatment of lower limb fractures in the developing skeleton with the use of bio-absorbable PLLA implants as a means of internal fixation. From 1997 until 2002, twenty-three patients (15 boys and 8 girls, ages ranging from 7 to 15 years old, mean of 12 years) who had suffered from 30 lower limb fractures were operated on in our department, with the use of PLLA screws as a means of internal fixation that followed the standard open reduction procedure. We surgically treated 20 tibial fractures (distal metaphysis:1,medial malleolar:6,distal epiphysis lesions:9,tibial spine:2, lateral tibial condyle:1, tibial shaft:1), 8 fibular fractures (distal metaphysis:2, distal epiphysis lesions:5, fibular shaft:1), one transtrochanteric fracture and 1 patellar fracture. All patients were operated on under constant radiographic control. A cast was applied, post-operatively, to all patients, for a period of 3–4 weeks. Gradual and assisted weight-bearing and ambulation, was commencing immediately after the cast removal. All patient’s (with the exception of 1 case of delayed callus formation) post-operative period was completely normal. However, follow-up revealed the development of osteolytic lesions (bone absorption cysts) in 3 of our patients. All lesions were located in the border between epiphysis and metaphysis, at the exact position were the PLLA screws had been placed. The use of PLLA implants in the treatment of fractures renders unnecessary a second operation for the removal of the osteosynthesis’ material. Nevertheless, we should be quite reluctant when deciding to use the PLLA screws in the treatment of these fractures in the developing skeleton, especially of the lower limbs, were the applied weight bearing forces are quite powerful.