Simple posterior elbow dislocations are often being treated with strict immobilization after reduction. We performed a study in order to investigate if a functional protocol of rehabilitation, allowing early motion, would be more effective. We prospectively followed twenty five consecutive patients for simple posterior elbow dislocation in a non-randomized study. Patients were divided in two groups. Group A (twelve cases) was treated with immobilization using a cast in 90 degrees of flexion and neutral rotation for three weeks. Group B (thirteen cases) was treated according to a functional rehabilitation program that allowed early controlled mobilization starting on the 2nd post-traumatic day, consisting of immediate flexion from 90° and gradual extension after the 2nd week. Follow-up of the patients was recorded at six weeks and three months. The functional scores used were Mayo Clinic Performance Index, Liverpool Elbow score and Broberg and Morey. None of the patients had an incident of redislocation. Patients of group B had statistically significant better (p<
0.05) functional scores at six weeks and better no statistically significant in three months: group B/group A: Mayo: 91.6/65.5, Liverpool: 8.8/6.1, Broberg and Morey: 89.1/73.3. It seems that a functional rehabilitation program gives the same result in terms of stability offering at the same time patients a better range of motion and functional score at least at six weeks and three months.
Nonunion of the distal radius is a rare complication (0.2%) which gradually can lead to deformity, pain and dysfunction of the hand. We examined 7 patients who developed nonunion of the distal radius after surgical intervention and we try to rationalize this complication. Our material consisted of 7 patients (2 male and 5 female) average 51 years old (31–75). Two patients with distal radial malunion, developed nonunion after corrective osteotomy. Four patients with comminuted metaphyseal radial fracture and concomitant distal ulna fracture, developed nonunion after application of an external fixator alone or in combination with internal fixation. Finally one patient with isolated fracture of the distal metaphysis developed nonunion after internal fixation. All patients after the confirmation of the nonunion and until radiological union underwent 1–3 operations. The index procedures for final union were wrist arthrodesis (1 patient) radioscapholunate fusion with excision of the distal scaphoid (2 patients) and internal fixation (4 patients). Additionally, in 6 patients a supplementary method for DRUJ asymmetry was needed. Results were estimated after a mean follow-up of 30,8 months (1–4 years) based on radiological and clinical criteria. There were 1 excellent, 5 good and 1 fair result. Despite the existence of predisposing factors (comminution, associated fracture of the distal ulna, metabolic disease, osteoporosis, distraction through external fixator), the contribution of the surgeon to the development of the nonunion is undeniable.
Three patients had neurovascular complications and were operated upon. Two of them with vascular injury were operated ungently and had arterial graft and stabilization of the clavicle or the A-C joint with tension band. The third patient with only neurological injury (axillary and suprascapular nerves) had similar stabilization of his clavicle. The remaining nine patients with minor displacement of the fractures and stable shoulder girdle were managed conservatively.