The 2020-2021 Canadian Residency Matching Service (CaRMS) match year was altered on an unprecedented scale. Visiting electives were cancelled at a national level, and the CaRMS interview tour was moved to a virtual model. These changes posed a significant challenge to both prospective students and program directors (PDs), requiring each party to employ alternative strategies to distinguish themselves throughout the match process. For a variety of reasons, including a decline in applicant interest secondary to reduced job prospects, the field of orthopaedic surgery was identified as vulnerable to many of these changes, creating a window of opportunity to evaluate their impacts on students and recruiting residency programs.

This longitudinal survey study was disseminated to match-year medical students (3rd and 4th year) with an interest in orthopaedic surgery, as well as orthopaedic surgery program directors. Responses to the survey were collected using an electronic form designed in Qualtrics (Qualtrics, 2021, Provo, Utah, USA). Students were contacted through social media posts, as well as by snowball sampling methods through appropriate medical student leadership intermediates. The survey was disseminated to all 17 orthopedic surgery program directors in Canada.

A pre-match and post-match iteration of this survey were designed to identify whether expectations differed from reality regarding the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the CaRMS match 2020-2021 process. A similar package was disseminated to Canadian orthopaedic surgery program directors pre-match, with an option to opt-in for a post-match survey follow-up. This survey had a focus on program directors’ opinions of various novel communication, recruitment, and assessment strategies, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Students’ responses to the loss of visiting electives were negative. Despite a reduction in financial stress associated with reduced need to travel (p=0.001), this was identified as a core component of the clerkship experience. In the case of virtual interviews, students’ initial trepidation pre-CaRMS turned into a positive outlook post-CaRMS (significant improvement, p=0.009) indicating an overall satisfaction with the virtual interview format, despite some concerns about a reduction in their capacity to network. Program directors and selection committee faculty also felt positively about the virtual interview format. Both students and program directors were overwhelmingly positive about virtual events put on by both school programs and student-led initiatives to complement the CaRMS tour.

CaRMS was initially developed to facilitate the matching process for both students and programs alike. We hope to continue this tradition of student-led and student-informed change by providing three evidence-based recommendations. First, visiting electives should not be discontinued in future iterations of CaRMS if at all possible. Second, virtual interviews should be considered as an alternative approach to the CaRMS interview tour moving forward. And third, ongoing virtual events should be associated with a centralized platform from which programs can easily communicate virtual sessions to their target audience.

Purpose of the study: We compared the reinnervation capacities of two nerve transfers onto the common trunk of the musculocutaneous nerve (MC), several bundles of the ulnar nerve (UN) and three intercostal nerves (IC) in patients with high brachial plexus palsy (C5C6 or C5C6C7).

Material and methods: Prospective consecutive study of two groups: group 1: 24 transfers and two to three UN bundles in 20 patients with C5C6 and four with C5C6C7, mean age at surgery 29.5 years; group 2: 15 neurotisations of the MC by CI in four C5C6 palsies and in 11 CC5C6C7 palsies, mean age at surgery 25.7 years. Mean time from accident to operation was 5.7 months, mean follow-up 29.4 months.

Results: The first contractions of the biceps were perceived clinically at 5.2 months after the surgery in group1 versus 9.9 months for group 2. Four patients in group 1 (17.0%) did not recover active flexion greater than M3 versus four (27%) in group 2. Mean force using the BMRC score was 3.6 in group 1 versus 3.2 in group 2. When elbow flexion was ≥3 (BMRC), force could be measured at 4.5kg in group 1 and 3.0 kg in group 2. For time to management up to seventh month, the two groups were comparable concerning pertinent results, but after that delay, none of the patients in group 2 achieved elbow flexion ≥3 versus 66% in group 1 up to one year. Up to the age of 40 years, results were comparable; no pertinent result was obtained after that age in group 2 versus 66% in group 1. C5C6C7 palsies had less favourable results irrespective of the technique.

Discussion: Our results show the superiority of UN transfer over CI transfer. In patients who undergo surgery before the seventh month, the rate of pertinent outcome was comparable although the flexion force was significantly greater in group 1. After seven months, only UN transfer offers hope of a useful result, up to the twelfth month. Before the age of 25 years, results are comparable, after 40, no pertinent result was observed after CI transfer while useful contraction could be obtained up to 45 years with UN transfer. C5C6C7 forms recover less well irrespective of the technique.

Purpose of the study: The slightest alteration of the antebrachial anatomic configuration, which constitutes a complex and precise biomechanical system, yields a limitation in pronosupination. Unlike the metaphysical region, little is known about rotational malunion involving the radial shaft. Kasten et all demonstrated in 30 cases that a rotational malunion of the radial shaft leads to significant loss in the pronosupination arc. If the proximal and distal radioulnar joints are intact, the interosseous membrane (IOM) probably plays an important role in this limitation.

Material and methods: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the impact of releasing the IOM on the pro-nosupination arc in an experimental model with a rotational malunion of the radial shaft inducing pronation.

Results: The study involved eight cadaver forearms free of all muscle structures and devoid of prior trauma. After stabilizing the elbow at 90°, the upper limb was fixed on a metal frame used as the reference to measure pronosupination. For each specimen, motion was measured initially, after osteotomy of the radius shaft to induce pronation then associated with longitudinal section of the IOM. A midshaft transverse osteotomy induced 78±7 pronation on average and was fixed with a DCP.

Discussion: The mean pronosupination arc was initially 175 in our population (81 pronation, 94 supination). After the creating the rotational malunion, this arc decreased significantly to 126 (SD. p> 0.05) (99 pronation, 27 supination). Release of the IOM increased this arc significantly from 27 to 153 (SD, p> 0.05) (105 pronation, 48supination)

Conclusion: Our study confirms the impact of rotational malunion on the pronosupination arc and shows the positive effect of releasing the IOM. Suppression of the IOM leads to a simpler biomechanics for the antebrachial system, allowing greater mobility of the bone one over the other. There are several clinical applications of this observation for the correction of shaft malunion of the antebrachial bones, but also certain corrective osteotomies for malpositions in the neurological patient.

Purpose of the study: Benign tumors of peripheral nerves are exceptional. Schwannomas predominate. Most tumors are revealed by tumefaction or pain over a nerve trajectory. The risk of degeneration is very low. Magnetic resonance imaging is the exploration of choice. The risk of sequelae or recurrence must nevertheless be determined with precision. We reviewed our experience with 93 benign tumors of peripheral nerves to search for factors predictive of prognosis.

Material and methods: This retrospective analysis included patients seen between 1979 and 2004. We collected a series of 89 patients, 41 women and 48 men, mean age 48 years, age range 18–80, with 93 benign tumors. Mean time from symptom onset (pain) to diagnosis was 20 months. The patients consulted for pain (n=78), presence of a mass (n=79) or both (n=66). Percussion produced paresthesia in 54 patients. Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging was available for 45 patients. The same surgeon performed nerve microsurgery in all patients. A prior procedure had been performed in another institution for 23 patients. The tumors were: schwannoma (n=74), neurofibroma (n=14), plexiform neurofibroma (n=3), angiolipoma (n=1) and intranervous lipoma (n=1). Mean tumor size was 31 mm (range 7–120 mm). Tumors were located in the brachial plexus (n=13), the upper limb (n=29), the trunk (n=1) and the lower limb (n=50). Complete resection was achieved in 83 cases, with removal of a non-stimulatable fascicle in 50 cases and a motor fascicle in

4. Nerve repair was required for 11 cases: 5 by direct suture and 6 with grafts. Resection was impossible for 4 tumors treated by neurolysis, decompressive epineu-rotomy, biopsy and interfascicular dissection.

Results: Mean follow-up was 96 months (range 3–300). Outcome was very good for 42, good for 25, fair for 8 and poor for 5 (all seen secondarily). Nine patients were lost to follow-up. There were no cases of recurrence.

Discussion: Microsurgical procedures are necessary for resection of nerve tumors in order to preserve the fascicles and thus function. Unresectable tumors and secondary grafts yield les satisfactory results, in our series and in the literature. Similarly, the duration of the symptoms and the size of the tumor increase the risk of operative difficulty and sequelae. Despite high-performance imaging techniques, surgery is the only sure way to establish certain diagnosis.