Our aim was to evaluate the indications for patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee prior to referral to an orthopaedic specialist, and ascertain whether these scans altered initial management. We retrospectively reviewed all referrals received by a single specialist knee surgeon over a 1-year period. Patient demographics, relevant history, examination findings and past surgical procedures were documented. Patients having undergone MRI prior to referral were identified and indications for the scans recorded. These were reviewed against The NHS guidelines for Primary Care Physicians to identify if the imaging performed was appropriate in each case.Aims and objectives
Materials and Method
To review the results of the treatment of pilon fracture with percutaneous internal fixation and extrarticular ring fixation in neutralization, twenty-two fractures in twenty-one patients were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.3 years. Five fractures were classified Ruedi-Algower type I, six were Ruedi-Algower type II and eleven Ruedi-Algower type III. Six were open fractures (3 Gustilo type III) and there were 19 associated fibular fractures (five were internally fIxed). Thirteen fractures (60%) were associated with metaphysealdiaphyseal dissociation (MDD). The majority of fractures were high energy (18 out of 22). General health outcome was assessed with the use of the SF-36 and functional outcome was evaluated with AOFAS score and Bone’s criteria. The average AOFAS score for the study population was 79.4. The AOFAS scores decreased as the severity of the fracture increases and these differences were statistically significant between the Ruedi-Algower types I and III. The pilon fractures population scored lower in all SF-36 categories but mental health and energy and vitality when compared to an age matched population but statistically significant differences were only found in the categories of physical function and limitation due to health problems. 65% achieved excellent or good results according to Bone’s criteria. No significant differences were found in the union times in the MDD group (253 days) when compared to the fractures with no MDD (224 days), but this can be due to the high incidence of autograft in the MDD group (7 out of 13). All patients achieved full weight bearing at 6 weeks. Fourteen patients had superficial pin site infections (one needed screw removal) that settled with oral antibiotics. There was one case of non-union and two varus heels.
The average shortening was 34.8 mm (8–60), the average maximum deformity in any one plane was 19.8 degree (6–40). All the patient underwent corrective surgery and lengthening, five patients had Sheffield Ring Fixator, two had Limb Reconstruction System and one had percutaneous osteotomy on Albizzia nail. The patients who underwent SRF and LRS stayed in the frame for an average 258 days (150–435) The residual leg length discrepancy was 5.5 mm (0–12). There was three grade one complications, three grade two complications, and one patient had grade IV complication following compartment syndrome. Four patients had grade two pin site infection and three patients had grade one.
We reviewed 35 patients who underwent a medial unicondylar knee replacement, with an average follow up of 4 years (for functional assessment). All patents had a weight bearing AP and lateral X rays and were clinically assessed using Hospital for Special surgery score, Bristol Knee Score and SF 36 health assessment form. Five angles were measured on the x-rays to assess the alignment of the tibial and femoral alignment. There was a significant relation between the femoral component varus/valgus angle and three sub scores (fixed flexion contracture, maximum valgus/varus and range of movement) in Bristol Knee scores. The best functional out come correlated with femoral components of 4–8 degrees of valgus.
We found the center of pressure of the ankle joint to be situated in the antero-medial quadrant, close to the center of the ankle joint. Distraction of the ankle joint by 5 mm eliminated any contact pressures at the ankle joint when the tibia was loaded up to 700N (one time body weight). When the joint was distracted by 10 mm no contact pressures were found in the ankle when loaded up to 1400N (two times body weight)
The center of pressure of the ankle joint is situated in the antero-medial quadrant. Distraction of 5 mm will eliminate ankle contact pressure up to one times body weight whereas distraction of 10 mm will eliminate contact pressures up to two times body weight.