The fractures of the hip are a main problem of health care. These fractures will be multiply by 2 in 2025 and 3 in 2050. In the population of old people, 1/3 of the women and 1/9 of the men will have a fracture of their hip. Some authors used the name of “EPIDEMIC”. The aima of the INPECH project (Indicators of the Performance for the comparison between hospital) was to check if the comparison of performances of clinical teams, on the basis of indicators chosen by themselves, allowed to improve their performances. It was an experimentation of a volonteer processes of comparison of performance between 3 multidisciplinary teams. The study followed some stages:
in every hospital, description of the process of care of the hip fractures with a choice of indicators of performance (difficulties of the care percepted by the professionals, possibilities of improvement, feasibility of the record of the indicators during the whole process) a first meeting of concertation with the three hospitals where a common choice of 20 indicators was done: 5 factors of adjustement corresponding to the prefracture status, 10 factors of the processes and 5 factors recorded at 3 months postoperatively a first period of inclusion (433 patients of more than 65 years-old) a second meeting of confrontation in order to analyze the results of the first inclusion period and to have exchange between the different teams about the disparities - the age, the autonomy and the mobility of the patients did not differ between the hospitals - the preoperative time was significantly different: 0.7 to 3.6 days - the time of the first get up (2 to 4 days), of the first social demand 3 to 7 days), of the hospitalization in surgery (9 to 14 days) and the rate of transfert in rehabilitation centers varied significantly between the centers. - At three months, the mortality, the levels of dependance and of autonomy were not significantly different. Each team had a reflexion about the opportunities of improvement and the actions to begin A second period of inclusion was realized in order to objectivize if the proposed improvements allowed a real change of our professional practices. (423 patients) The analysis of this second inclusion authorized a real change in our professional practices and showed the efficacy of the indicators which were improved. This study had permitted to show qualitative differences of care of hip fractures between the hospitals. The confrontation between the teams had authorized a positive reflexion of some of our professional practices and the improvement was underlined by the second series of inclusion.
Frequency is probably under evaluated and their treatment and consequences subject to discussion. Dislocation has to be differentiated from knee instability, subluxation and expulsion of the PE tibial insert. The purpose of this review was to study their mechanism, treatment and consequences. A modification of the surgical technique and the insert design was deduced.
A prospective analysis was performed to compare the following variables of these patients (study group) to 56 cases who did not experience that complication (control group): age, sex, weight, component size, surgical approach, importance of release, pre and post surgical scores, alignment, stability, patella and component thickness. Statistical analysis of these parameters was performed.
Conservative treatment was successful in 10 cases, but 3 recurrent dislocations and a neglected dislocation were treated surgically after modification of the tibial insert.
After modifications of the stabilizer concerning height and slight posterior displacement, in a personal series of 129 TKA, dislocations disappeared.
The functional outcome was excellent in 64% of the cases, good in 21.5% of the cases. Pins removal was almost necessary for proximal pins migration in 45% of the cases and distal migration in 7.5% of the cases.
We studied the time course of micro-embolism by recording high intensity transient signals (HITS) on Doppler venous blood flow studies during a 7-day period in 57 of 63 consecutive patients after hip or knee replacement. No HITS were found before surgery, or in the non-operated leg after surgery. In the operated leg, the median number of HITS per minute showed an exponential decrease with time; a 50% reduction in the number of HITS took 72 minutes. Regardless of the duration and severity of HITS, we found no clinically apparent embolic event. Colour Doppler imaging at days 8 to 10 after operation showed a deep venous thrombosis in 17% of our patients with one thrombosis of the long saphenous vein. The presence or severity of HITS did not predict the venous thrombi. Although we found no pulmonary complications, we detected micro-emboli over a longer period after surgery than is usually reported. Spectral analysis of the Doppler venous signal is a repeatable and non-invasive monitoring technique in the post-surgical period. We failed to prove a correlation between deep venous thrombi and micro-emboli detected by this method.