Previous clinical studies have shown the efficacy of a foreign body-induced membrane combined with bone autograft for the reconstruction of traumatologic or pathologic large bone defects or, bone non union. This membrane, rich in mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC), avoids bone autograft resorption and promotes consolidation by revascularisation of the bone and secretion of growth factors. Reconstruction requires two different surgical stages: firstly, insertion of a cement spacer in the defect, and secondly, removal of the spacer, preservation of the foreign body-induced membrane and filling of the cavity by bone autograft. The optimal time to perform the second surgical stage remains unclear. So, we aimed to correlate bone healing and, phenotype and function of cells isolated from the induced membrane, in patients whose second surgery was performed on average after 6 months (i.e. beyond the recommended time of one month). Cell phenotype was determined by flow cytometry and cell function by: alkaline Phosphatase enzyme activity, secretion of calcium and von Kossa staining. Second, using histological and immunohistochemistry studies, we aimed to determine the nature and function of induced membrane over time. Seven patients were included with their consent. Results showed Treated patients achieved in all cases bone union (except for one patient) and in in vitro and histology and immunohistochemistry gave some indications which need to be completed in the future. First, patient age seemed to be an indicator of bone union speed and recurrent infection, appeared to influence in vitro MSC osteogenic potential and induced membrane structure. Second, we reported, in bone repair situation, the commitment over time in osteogenic lineage of a surprising multipotent tissue (induced membrane) able of vascularisation/ osteogenesis/ chondrogenesis at a precocious time. Finally, best time to perform the second stage (one month) could be easily exceeded since bone union occurred even at very late times.
To compare the therapeutic potential of tissue-engineered constructs (TECs) combining mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and coral granules from either Bone marrow-derived, autologous MSCs were seeded on Objectives
Materials and Methods
Bone tissue engineering constructs (BTEC) combining natural resorbable osteoconductive scaffolds and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have given promising results to repair critical size bone defect. Yet, results remain inconsistent. Adjonction of an osteoinductive factor to these BTEC, such as rh-BMP-2, to improve bone healing, seems to be a relevant strategy. However, currently supraphysiological dose of this protein are used and can lead to adverse effects such as inflammation, ectopic bone and/or bone cyst formation. Interestingly, in a preliminary study conducted in ectopic site in a murine model, a synergistic effect on bone formation was observed only when a low dose of rh-BMP-2 was associated with MSCs-seeded coral scaffolds but not with a high dose. The objective of the study was then to evaluate a BTEC combining coral scaffold, MSCs and a low dose of rh-BMP-2 in a large animal model of clinical relevance. Sixteen sheep were used for this study. MSCs were isolated from an aspirate of bone marrow harvested from the iliac crest of each sheep receiving BTEC with MSCs, cultivated and seeded on Rh-BMP-2, used at two different doses (low dose: 68μg/defect and high dose: 680μg/defect), was diluted and absorbed on Metatarsal segmental bone defects (25 mm) were made in the left metatarsal bone of the sheep, stabilized by plate fixation, and filled with Bone volumes (BV) evaluated by μCT and bone surfaces (BS) evaluated by histomorphometry did not differ between groups (BV: 1914±870, 1737±841, 1894±1028 and 1835±1342 mm3; BS: 25,41±14,25, 19,85±8,31, 25,54±16,98 and 26,08±22,52 %; groups 1, 2, 3 and control respectively); however, an higher bone union was observed in group 1 compared to the others (3, 1, 2 and 2 sheep with bone union in groups 1, 2, 3 and control respectively). No histological abnormalities were observed in any group. Coral resorption was almost complete in all specimens. No significant difference in coral volumes and coral surfaces was observed between groups. A trend towards a higher variability in coral resorption was noted in group 1 compared to the others. There seems to be a benefit to associate low dose of rh-BMP-2 with MSCs-seeded coral scaffolds as this strategy allowed an increase of bone unions in our model. Yet, results remain inconsistent. Although, defective coupling between scaffold resorption and bone formation impaired bone healing in some animals, adjunction of rh-BMP-2 (even at low dose) to CSMs loaded construct is a promising strategy for bone tissue engineering.
MSCs could promote bone regeneration in sheep when loaded on natural fully-resorbable scaffolds, but results are highly variable. Improving the ultimate performance of cell-containing constructs cannot be limited to the decreased rate of scaffold resorption. Introduction. Tissue constructs containing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are an appealing strategy for repairing massive segmental bone defects. However, their therapeutic effectiveness does not match that of autologous bone grafts; among the failure reasons the scaffold resorbability has been identified as a critical feature for achieving bone regeneration. In the present study, the osteogenic potential of 2 constructs obtained by expanding in a bioreactor autologous MSCs onto granules of Acropora or Porites coral, natural fully-resorbable scaffolds, was compared. 15 sheep underwent a 25 mm long metatarsal ostectomy stabilised with a 3.5 DCP plate. Bone defects were replaced with (i) MSCs-Acropora constructs (n=7), (ii) MSCs-Porites constructs (n=6), (iii) autograft (n=2). Animals were sacrificed 4 months later and bone healing and coral resorption was documented by radiographic, histologic and microCT studies.Summary
Materials and methods
The use of mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine remains a promising approach due to the ability of these cells to differentiate into a variety of cell types of mesodermal lineage. Today, however, it is not clear whether long-term differentiation of MSCs is necessary or alternatively whether the benefits of MSCs can be conferred by transitory paracrine effects (via secreted chemical compounds). Human MSCs secrete a broad variety of cytokines, chemokines and growth factors that may potentially be involved in tissue repair. Nevertheless, hMSCs secretome profile is closely related to cells biological and chemical environment (pO2, inflammation, nutrients disponibility…). In the context of stem-cell-based regenerative medicine, upon implantation, hMSC are exposed to stresses such as ischemia, oxidative stress and inflammatory mediators. Knowledge of the paracrine properties of stem cells under hypoxic conditions is essential for planning appropriate strategies that overcome the potential negative impacts of all levels of low oxygen content (from hypoxiato anoxia) leading to ischemia and tissue necrosis pertinent to MSC-based tissue engineered constructs. Since the beneficial effects of stem cells may be confered predominantly indirectly through paracrine mechanisms, the present study was designed to characterise the hMSC secretome and to assess its biological effects considering oxygen level and nutrients disponibility. hMSCs were exposed Introduction
Methods
In this study, we challenged the current paradigm of human Mesenchymal Stem Cells survival, which assigned a pivotal role to oxygen, by testing the hypothesis that exogenous glucose may be key to their survival. The survival of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) has elicited a great deal of interest, because it is relevant to the efficacy of engineered tissues. However, to date, hMSCs have not met this promise, in part due to the high death rate of cells upon transplantation. In this study, we challenged the current paradigm of hMSC survival, which assigned a pivotal role to oxygen, by testing the hypothesis that exogenous glucose may be key to hMSC survival.Summary
Introduction
Despite similar, early and massive death, hMSCs promote bone formation which was higher in orthotopic than ectopic site suggesting a trophic effect of hMSCs. Ectopic implantation is suitable to evaluate cell survival, but assessment of bone formation requires orthotopic implantation Tissue constructs containing mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are appealing strategies for repairing large segmental bone defects but they do not allow consistent bone healing and early and massive MSCs death was identified as a cause of failure. However, little is known about cell survival in the clinical micro-environment encountered during bone healing process, whereas ectopic evaluation is well documented.
Summary
Introduction
The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) loaded on osteoconductive scaffolds has emerged as a potential new treatment of large bone defects but has generated marginally successful results in terms of new bone formation. It is supposed that MSC massive death post implantation is a major obstacle for the exhibition of their osteogenic potential. Yet, the very few studies conducted using primary human MSCs derived from bone marrow (hMSCs), a clinically pertinent cell source, did not demonstrate that cell survival is required for new bone formation. In order to elucidate whether cell survival is needed for hMSC to express their osteogenic potential, the present study examined in an ectopic mouse model the relationship between cell survival and osteogenic potential of hMSCs loaded onto osteoconductive scaffold. hMSCs (106) were seeded on 40-mg calcium carbonate (Biocoral) particles (size: 610–1000 µm), wrapped in fibrin gel (Baxter), and implanted subcutaneously into immunodeficient (nu/nu) mice (n=8/group). The fate of implanted cells was analysed using the bioluminescence and immunohistochemistry. For this, hMSCs were transduced with Luc-GFP (Luciferase-Green fluorescent protein) lentiviral vectors prior to experimentation. Bone formation was analysed 8 weeks post implantation on both non-decalcified and decalcified samples.Introduction
Materials and Methods
The present study demonstrated the feasibility of culturing a large number of standardised granular MSC-containing constructs in a packed bed/column bioreactor that can produce sheep MSC-containing constructs to repair critical-size bone defects in sheep model. Endogenous tissue regeneration mechanisms do not suffice to repair large segmental long-bone defects. Although autologous bone graft remains the gold standard for bone repair, the pertinent surgical technique is limited. Tissue constructs composed of MSCs seeded onto biocompatible scaffolds have been proposed for repairing bone defects and have been established in clinically-relevant animal models. Producing tissue constructs for healing bone defects of clinically-relevant volume requires a large number of cells to heal an approximately 3 cm segmental bone defect. For this reason, a major challenge is to expand cells from a bone marrow aspirate to a much larger, and sufficient, number of MSCs. In this respect, bioreactor systems which provide a reproducible and well-controlled three-dimensional (3D) environment suitable for either production of multiple or large size tissue constructs are attractive approaches to expand MSCs and obtain MSC-containing constructs of clinical grade. In these bioreactor systems, MSCs loaded onto scaffolds are exposed to fluid flow, a condition that provides both enhanced access to oxygen and nutrients as well as fluid-flow-driven mechanical stimulation to cells. The present study was to evaluate bioreactor containing autologous MSCs loaded on coral scaffolds to repair critical-size bone defects in sheep model.Short Summary
Introduction
Shear stress and hydrostatic effects on the hMSCs early mechano gene response were similar. For the same magnitude gene response, the hydrostatic compression (1.5×105 Pascal) is a 200000 times greater than the force exerted by shear stress (0.7 Pascal). In the lab, a perfusion bioreactor designed to automate the production of bone constructs was developed. The proof of concept was established in a large animal model of clinical relevance. The cells perfused in the bioreactor are likely to perceive 2 types of stresses: shear stress and hydrostatic pressure. Optimization of this bioreactor implies a better understanding of the effects of these forces on the cells in order to have better proliferation and differentiation. An understanding of the response of one cell layer submit to various strength is relevant. The primary objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that hMSCs have the fundamental ability to distinguish between different types of mechanical signals as evidenced by distinct gene expression. The effect of shear stress on one cell layer cultures of hMSCs will be evaluated using a commercially available system called Ibidi. For the hydrostatic pressure as there is no commercial device available, our group has developed a prototype capable of delivering a well-defined mechanical loading to cells in culture. Validation of the techniques: In order to validate the systems (shear stress and cyclic pressure apparatus) used in this study, we have used an osteocytes-like cell line, MLO-Y4. When stimulated by a 30 minutes PFF at 7 dyn/cm2 or hydrostatic compression at 1.5 bar, cells responded by producing NO in the culture media NO release after mechanical stimulation of hMSCs: hMSCs were subjected to increased PFF (7 to 42 dyn/cm2) for 30 minutes. This stimulation resulted in an increased release of NO in the media compared to non-stimulated cells (p<0.05). Interestingly the level of NO was maximal at 7 dyn/cm2 and decreased with higher flow rate. Similar observation was made after hMSCs stimulation by hydrostatic pressure for 30 minutes: a peak of NO release at 1.5 bar was observed Early gene expression of known mechano-sensitive genes: Gene expression analysis immediately after stimulation (PFF or hydrostatic compression) was performed on a range of known mechano-sensitive genes: NOS2, PTGS2, PTGES, IER3 and EGR1. Immediately after stimulation by PFF at 7 dyn/cm2 or hydrostatic pressure at 1.5 bars, the expression of all the genes of interest appear to be up regulated in stimulated cellsSummary
Introduction
45S5 bioactive glass combined with hMSC did not permit Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) are capable of bone formation and can promote the repair of osseous defects when implanted in appropriate scaffolds. The most promising biomaterials for application in bone tissue engineering (TE) are hydroxyapatite (HA), tricalcium phosphate (TCP), calcium carbonate (coral) ceramics or bioactive glasses (BG) because of their osteoconductive properties and ability to enhance bone formation. However, information regarding the osteogenic potential of hBMSCs in combination with BG scaffolds is strikingly lacking in the TE field. The present study focused on evaluating the osteogenicity of bone constructs prepared from particles of 45S5 BG combined with hBMSCs in comparison with biphasic HA/TCP or coral particles, in a mouse ectopic model. The in vivo osteogenicity was then correlated with various aspects of the effects of the scaffold materials tested on hBMSCs functions pertinent to bone tissue formation. Particular attention was given to the pH in the microenvironment where the cells reside in TE constructs and its effect on the osteoblastic differentiation of hBMSCs. In vivo experiments evidenced that 45S5 BG constructs with hBMSCs failed to form ectopic bone. In contrast, the cell constructs prepared with either HA/TCP or coral ceramics displayed great and consistent capacity for the ectopic bone formation. The cytocompatibility of hBMSCs on BG material was addressed and no differences were evidenced between HA/TCP and coral substrates related to the adhesion of hBMSCs and their proliferation in vitro. The hBMSCs viability was even higher within the 45S5 BG-containing constructs compared to the other two types of material constructs tested both in vitro and in vivo. These findings indicated that the absence of The potential of osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs cultured on material substrates was next addressed and the ALP activity of hBMSCs was significantly diminished when these cells were cultured on 45S5 BG as compared to either HA/TCP or coral substrates. Because BG materials are well-known for causing external alkalinisation, the pH was specifically measured in TE constructs. The pH inside the cell-containing BG constructs, measured ex vivo, was 8.0 (i.e. 0.4–0.5 units more alkaline than that measured in the coral- or HA/TCP-constructs). The impact of such external alkalinisation on the osteogenic differentiation of hBMSCs was assessed by culturing the cells over a wide range of alkaline pH. The hBMSCs expression of osteogenic markers, ALP activity and mineralization were not significantly affected at moderate external alkaline pH (≤ 7.90) but were dramatically inhibited at higher pH. Altogether, these findings provided evidence that despite 45S5 BG are reported to be good osteoconductive materials, they are not necessarily good scaffolds for TE, most likely due to the alkalinization of the 45S5 microenvironment that affects adversely the osteogenic differentiation of precursor cells. Controlling the shifts of pH in the local engineered extracellular environment is a critical issue for the development of bioactive TE scaffolds.Summary
Limited success in regenerating large bone defects has been achieved by bridging them with osteoconductive materials. These substitutes lack the osteogenic and osteoinductive properties of bone autograft. A direct approach would be to stimulate osteogenesis in these biomaterials by the addition of fresh bone-marrow cells (BMC). We therefore created osteoperiosteal gaps 2 cm wide in the ulna of adult rabbits and either bridged them with coral alone (CC), coral supplemented with BMC, or left them empty. Coral was chosen as a scaffold because of its good biocompatibility and resorbability. In osteoperiosteal gaps bridged with coral only, the coral was invaded chiefly by fibrous tissue. It was insufficient to produce union after two months. In defects filled with coral and BMC an increase in osteogenesis was observed and the bone surface area was significantly higher compared with defects filled with coral alone. Bony union occurred in six out of six defects filled with coral and BMC after two months. An increase in the resorption of coral was also observed, suggesting that resorbing cells or their progenitors were present in bone marrow and survived the grafting procedure. Our findings have shown that supplementation of coral with BMC increased both the resorption of material and osteogenesis in defects of a clinical significance.
