In metal-on-metal (MoM) hip arthroplasties and resurfacings, mechanically induced corrosion can lead to elevated serum metal ions, a local inflammatory response, and formation of pseudotumours, ultimately requiring revision. The size and diametral clearance of anatomical (ADM) and modular (MDM) dual-mobility polyethylene bearings match those of Birmingham hip MoM components. If the acetabular component is satisfactorily positioned, well integrated into the bone, and has no surface damage, this presents the opportunity for revision with exchange of the metal head for ADM/MDM polyethylene bearings without removal of the acetabular component. Between 2012 and 2020, across two centres, 94 patients underwent revision of Birmingham MoM hip arthroplasties or resurfacings. Mean age was 65.5 years (33 to 87). In 53 patients (56.4%), the acetabular component was retained and dual-mobility bearings were used (DM); in 41 (43.6%) the acetabulum was revised (AR). Patients underwent follow-up of minimum two-years (mean 4.6 (2.1 to 8.5) years).Aims
Methods
Recent guidance recommends the use of a well-proven
cemented femoral stem for hemiarthroplasty in the management of
fractures of the femoral neck, and the Exeter Trauma Stem (ETS)
has been suggested as an example of such an implant. The design
of this stem was based on the well-proven Exeter Total Hip Replacement
stem (ETHRS). This study assessed the surface finish of the ETS
in comparison with the ETHRS. Two ETSs and two ETHRSs were examined
using a profilometer with a precision of 1 nm and compared with
an explanted Exeter Matt stem. The mean roughness average (RA) of
the ETSs was approximately ten times higher than that of the ETHRSs (0.235 μm
(0.095 to 0.452) Cite this article:
Increased femoral head size may reduce dislocation rates following total hip replacement. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales has highlighted a statistically significant increase in the use of femoral heads ≥ 36 mm in diameter from 5% in 2005 to 26% in 2009, together with an increase in the use of the posterior approach. The aim of this study was to determine whether rates of dislocation have fallen over the same period. National data for England for 247 546 procedures were analysed in order to determine trends in the rate of dislocation at three, six, 12 and 18 months after operation during this time. The 18-month revision rates were also examined. Between 2005 and 2009 there were significant decreases in cumulative dislocations at three months (1.12% to 0.86%), six months (1.25% to 0.96%) and 12 months (1.42% to 1.11%) (all p <
0.001), and at 18 months (1.56% to 1.31%) for the period 2005 to 2008 (p <
0.001). The 18-month revision rates did not significantly change during the study period (1.26% to 1.39%, odds ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.24), p = 0.118). There was no evidence of changes in the coding of dislocations during this time. These data have revealed a significant reduction in dislocations associated with the use of large femoral head sizes, with no change in the 18-month revision rate.
The ABG I cementless hip prosthesis has demonstrated unacceptably high rates of wear and osteolysis in our patients. We performed a retrospective study of 97 hips implanted between 1992 and 1998. Radiographic analysis revealed high rates of wear of the polyethylene liner with marked periacetabular osteolysis. Clinical examination indicated that many of these patients were initially asymptomatic. Wear-related problems have required ten hips to be revised and a furher 13 are awaiting revision. This gives a failure rate of 24% at a mean follow-up of 69 months. Contributing factors are likely to include poor wear characteristics of the polyethylene liners which were gamma irradiated in air, and increased wear debris caused by a poor fit of the polyethylene liner within the shell. We believe that all ABG I implants should be immediately reviewed and remain under careful, long-term follow-up.
