Component position and overall limb alignment following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been shown to influence prosthetic survivorship and clinical outcomes. Robotic-assisted (RA) total knee arthroplasty has demonstrated improved accuracy to plan in cadaver studies compared to conventionally instrumented (manual) TKA, but less clinical evidence has been reported. The objective of this study was to compare the three-dimensional accuracy to plan of RATKA with manual TKA for overall limb alignment and component position. A non-randomized, prospective multi-center clinical study was conducted to compare RATKA and manual TKA at 4 U.S. centers between July 2016 and August 2018. Computed tomography (CT) scans obtained approximately 6 weeks post-operatively were analyzed using anatomical landmarks. Absolute deviation from surgical plans were defined as the absolute value of the difference between the CT measurements and surgeons’ operative plan for overall limb, femoral and tibial component mechanical varus/valgus alignment, tibial component posterior slope, and femoral component internal/external rotation. We tested the differences of absolute deviation from plan between manual and RATKA groups using stratified Wilcoxon tests, which controlled for study center and accounted for skewed distributions of the absolute values. Alpha was 0.05 two-sided. At the time of this abstract, data collections were completed for two centers (52 manual and 58 RATKA).Introduction
Methods
Revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be very complex in nature with difficulties/obstacles involving bone and soft tissue deficits, visualization and exposure, as well as alignment and fixation. Auxiliary devices such as augmentation and offset adapters help address these issues; however they increase the complexity of the reconstruction. The objective of this study was to show that use of a single radius revision TKA system allowing for minimal auxiliary revision devices can yield positive early clinical outcomes. This data was collected as part of a prospective, post-market, multicenter study. One hundred and twenty-five single radius revision TKA cases were evaluated. Surgical details were reviewed and cases were grouped based on type of auxiliary devices used. Group 1 included cases that used only femoral and/or tibial augments. Group 2 used femoral and/or tibial augments in conjunction with femoral and/or tibial offset adapters. Early clinical outcomes, operative data and radiographic findings were used to compare cases.Introduction:
Methods:
