header advert
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 49 - 49
1 Mar 2013
Oosthuizen P Snyckers C
Full Access

Purpose

South African arthroplasty surgeons commonly make use of new bearing surface technology. This new technology only has short term, industry funded clinical trials or simulator studies available to prove its performance and motivate its use. These products are being used despite the availability of conventional components with proven long term in vivo efficacy.

In the light of the recent Du Puy ASR recall, which also showed initial good clinical results, we reviewed the available data on some of the new available bearing surface technology.

Methods

We performed a literature search to identify the best available clinical data regarding duration of follow up and number of patients for a selection of new bearing surfaces and compared it to well known long term clinical follow up studies and joint registry data of conventional products.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 84-B, Issue SUPP_I | Pages - 78
1 Mar 2002
Maritz N Oosthuizen P
Full Access

Because there is little in the literature about specific presentation and examination methods for acromioclavicular (AC) joint pathology, we aimed to define and identify the most reliable tests.

We identified and examined 30 patients with probable AC joint pathology. We then excluded eight patients who experienced no pain relief after local Lignocaine infiltration, and examined 22 patients, two of whom had bilateral shoulder problems.

There were 15 complaints of AC joint pain, 13 of anterior pain, five of posterior pain and five of lateral pain. Pain radiated anteriorly in 14 patients, posteriorly in two, laterally in three and to the cervical region in three. Pain increased with weight-bearing in 18 shoulders, on elevation in five, on activities of daily living in six, at night or on being lain on in 11, and on reaching across the body in three. Clinical examination revealed swelling in seven shoulders and AC joint prominence in seven. There was local tenderness in 21 shoulders and there were crepitations in four. The forced cross-body test produced pain in 22 shoulders. In 22 shoulders, elevation was less than 60°. Jobe’s test was positive in 20, the Speed’s test in 19, O’Brien’s test in 15, the compression test in 15, the distraction test in 13. A painful arc was present to 160° in 13 shoulders. There was neck tenderness in 13 patients. Associated conditions included two cases of shoulder arthritis, six of impingement, two rotator cuff tears, two cases of biceps tendinitis and two of cervical pathology. Radiological changes were evident in 19 AC joints, 13 shoulder joints and 11 cervical spines. On ultrasonography, pathology was resent in 10 of 15 cases.

The most common symptoms were pain with weight-bearing, elevation and lying on shoulder. Anterior and posterior pain was the most common. The most common clinical findings were local tenderness, pain on elevation and the forced cross-body test, positive Jobe’s and Speed’s tests. Because no test is 100% accurate, the whole clinical presentation must be taken into account. Local infiltration of the AC joint is extremely helpful.