Increased collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) in registries enables international comparison of patient-centered outcomes after knee and hip replacement. We aimed to investigate 1) variations in PROM improvement, 2) the possible confounding factor of BMI, and 3) differences in comorbidity distributions between registries. Registries affiliated with the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries (ISAR) or OECD membership countries were invited to report aggregate EQ-5D, OKS, OHS, HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS values. Eligible patients underwent primary total, unilateral knee or hip replacement for osteoarthritis within three years and had completed PROMs preoperatively and either 6 or 12 months postoperatively, excluding patients with subsequent revisions. For each PROM cohort, Chi-square tests were performed for BMI distributions across registries and 12 predefined PROM strata (male/female, age 20-64/65-74/>75, high or low preoperative PROM scores). Comorbidity distributions were reported for available comorbidity indexes. Thirteen registries from 9 countries contributed data, n~130000 knee (range 140 to 79848) and n~113000 hip (range 137 to 85281). Mean EQ-5D index values (10 registries) ranged from 0.53 to 0.71 (knee) and 0.50 to 0.70 (hips) preoperatively and 0.78 to 0.85 (knee) and 0.83 to 0.87 (hip) postoperatively. Mean OKS (6 registries) ranged from 19.3 to 23.6 preoperatively and 36.2 to 41.2 postoperatively. Mean OHS (7 registries) ranged from 18.0 to 23.2 preoperatively and 39.8 to 44.2 postoperatively. Four registries reported KOOS-PS and three reported HOOS-PS. Proportions of patients with BMI >30 ranged from 35 to 62% (10 knee registries) and 16 to 43% (11 hip registries). For both knee and hip registries, distributions of patients across six BMI categories differed significantly among registries (p30 were for patients in the youngest age groups (20 to 64 and 65 to 74 years) with the lowest baseline scores. Additionally, females with lowest preoperative PROM scores had highest BMI. These findings were echoed for the OHS and OKS cohorts. Proportions of patients with ASA scores ≥3 ranged from 7 to 42% (9 knee registries) and 6 to 35% (8 hip registries). PROM-score improvement varies between international registries, which may be partially explained by differences in age, sex and preoperative scores. BMI and comorbidity may be relevant to adjust for.
Previous publications have suggested that the incidence of revisions due to infection after THA is increasing. We performed updated time-trend analyses of risk and timing of revision due to infection after primary THAs in the Nordic countries during the period 2004–2018. 569,463 primary THAs reported to the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association from 2004 through 2018 were studied. We estimated adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence interval by Cox regression with the first revision due to infection after primary THA as endpoint. The risk of revision was investigated. In addition, we explored changes in the time span from primary THA to revision due to infection.Aim
Methods
Aseptic loosening is the leading cause of revision of total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is well recognized that an occult infection is the underlying cause of some aseptic revisions. Intraoperative cultures are central to the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, the diagnostic and prognostic value of unexpected positive intraoperative cultures remains unclear. The aim was to study whether first-time aseptic revision of a total hip arthroplasty with unexpected bacterial growth in cultures of intraoperatively taken biopsies have an increased risk of secondary revision due to all causes and increased risk of PJI revision, specifically. Cases reported as first-time aseptic loosening revisions to the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR) performed during January 1st, 2010, to May 15th, 2016, were included. DHR data were merged with the Danish Microbiology Database, which contains data from all intraoperatively obtained cultures in Denmark. Included first-time revisions were grouped based on the number of positive cultures growing the same bacteria genus: ≥2, 1 and 0 cultures. Revisions were followed until secondary revision, death, or end of follow-up period after one year. Relative risk for secondary revision due to all causes and PJI was estimated.Aim
Method
What is the fate of revision total joint arthroplasty, when conventional tissue sample culture (TSC) is negative and sonication fluid culture (SFC) is positive, in terms of re-revision? We prospectively analyzed explanted prosthetic materials from 211 consecutive cases of total hip and knee arthroplasty revision surgery performed on any indication during a one year period. We used a sonication apparatus and protocol that was previously described [Borens et al, 2013. J Orthop Res]. Sampling of five periprosthetic tissue biopsies was performed according to the local protocol and incubated for 5 days. In our non-interventional study design, clinicians were blinded to the results from sonication-culture, which were not used for the subsequent treatment strategy. In cases with suspected deep infection, thorough debridement was performed during revision surgery, and routine antibiotic treatment was dicloxacillin for 6–8 weeks. Patients were routinely seen in the outpatient clinic after 3 and 12 months, where clinical examination and any antibiotic treatment were documented. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. This cohort study is reported according to the STROBE guidelines.Aim
Method
To study whether revision for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after early PJI in primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) is associated with a high mortality, when compared with: Patients, who did not undergo revision for any reason and Patients who underwent an aseptic revision. This population-based cohort study was based on the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register on primary THA performed in Denmark from 2005 to 2014. Data from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register were linked to microbiology databases, the National Register of Patients, and the Civil Registration System to obtain data on microbiology, comorbidity, and vital status on all patients. The mortality risk for the patients who underwent revision for PJI within 1 year from implantation of primary THA was compared with (1) the mortality risk for patients who did not undergo revision for any reason within 1 year of primary THA; and (2) the mortality risk for patients who underwent an aseptic revision.Aim
Method
The primary aim of this in vitro study was to test the efficacy of daptomycin to eradicate staphylococcal biofilms on various orthopedic implant surfaces and materials. The secondary aim was to quantitatively estimate the formation of staphylococcal biofilm on various implant materials with different surface properties. We tested six clinically important biomaterials: cobalt chrome alloy, pure titanium, grid-blasted titanium, porous plasma-coated titanium with/without hydroxyapatite, and polyethylene. Two laboratory strains of bacteria commonly causing PJI were used, namely The time to detection expressed as the heat flow >50 µW (TTD-50) indirectly quantifies the initial amount of biofilm bacteria, with a shorter TTD-50 representing a larger amount of bacteria.Aim
Method
We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate if iodine impregnated incision drapes (IIID) increases bacterial recolonization rates compared to no drape use under conditions of simulated total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. Background: To prevent surgical site infection (SSI), one of the important issues is managing the patient´s own skin flora. Many prophylactic initiatives have been suggested, including the use of IIID. IIID has been debated for many years and was deemed ineffective in preventing SSI in a recent systematic review [1], while some evidence suggests a potential increase in postoperative infection risk, as a result of IIID use [2]. IIID is sparsely investigated in orthopaedic surgery. An increase in the number of viable bacteria in the surgical field of an arthroplasty operation has a potential to increase the risk of SSI in an otherwise elective and clean procedure [3]. 20 patients scheduled for TKA were recruited. Each patient had one knee randomized for draping with IIID [4] while the contralateral knee was left bare, thus the patients acted as their own controls. Operating theater settings with laminar airflow and standard perioperative procedures were simulated. Sampling was performed with the cup-scrup technique [5] using appropriate neutralizers. Samples were collected from the skin of each knee prior to disinfection and on 2 occasions after skin-preparation, 75 minutes apart. Bacterial quantities were estimated by spread plating with 48-hour aerobic incubation. Outcome was measured as colony forming units per square centimeter of skin. We used Wilcoxon signed-rank test for comparative analysis within and between knees. Following skin-disinfection we found no significant difference in bacterial quantities between the intervention and the control knee (p = 0.388). Neither did we see any difference in bacterial quantities between the two groups after 75 minutes of simulated surgery (p = 0.367). When analyzed within the intervention and control group, bacterial quantities had not significantly increased at the end of surgery when compared to baseline, thus no recolonization was detected (p = 0.665 and 0.609, respectively). Iodine impregnated incision drapes did not increase bacterial recolonization rates in simulated TKA surgery. Thus, the results of this RCT study does not support the hypothesis that iodine impregnated incision drapes promotes bacterial recolonization and postoperative infection risk.
To compare the number of airborne bacteria and particles under laminar airflow (LAF) versus turbulent airflow (TAF) with 100% and 50% reduced fresh air exchange during simulated total hip arthroplasty (THA) Two equally dimensioned operating rooms (OR) build in 2009 with modern ventilation systems of LAF and TAF respectively were used during 32 simulated THA-operations under four different ventilation conditions: LAF or TAF with either full (n=8+8) or 50% reduced (n=8+8) fresh air exchange volume. We followed a protocol controlling the complete perioperative setup including interior cleaning, sterile materials, OR-personnel procedures, surgical clothing, instruments and 50-minute surgical procedure on a full-sized dummy at 37°C. Microbial contamination was determined intra-operatively by ISO-validated Microbiological Active Sampler (MAS-100, Merck, 100 L/min) at two 10-minute intervals in 30 cm distance of the operating field. Blood-agar plates from each operation were incubated for 2 days at 35°C and the microbial concentration was determined by viable counting of colony-forming units (CFU) per m3 air. Furthermore airborne particulate (0,5–10 µm) was sampled with ISO-validated light scattering particle analyzer (MET-one, Beckman Coulter, 28,3 L/min) during the 50-minute surgical procedure (1,42 m3/operation). Large particle sizes (>5 µm) are correlated with microbial contamination (Stocks, 2010). According to standards large-sized particle number must not exceed a 2.900/m3-threshold for cleanroom operations. Microbial air concentration (mean CFU/m3 ±standard deviation) under LAF conditions with full and 50% reduced fresh air exchange were 0,4±0,8 and 0,4±0,4 respectively, whereas air contamination under TAF conditions were significantly higher with 7,6±2,0 and 10,3±8,1 (p<0,05). Large (>5 µm) airborne particulate (mean no./m3 ±standard deviation) under LAF conditions with full and 50% reduced fresh air exchange were 1.581±2.841 and 1.018±1.084 respectively, whereas particulate under TAF conditions were 7.923±5.151 and 6.157±2.439 respectively. Microbial air contamination was significantly lower under LAF ventilation compared to TAF during simulated THA under both full and 50% reduced fresh air exchange in modern operating theatres used in daily clinic. The number of particles measured under TAF conditions exceeded the threshold for cleanroom operations in 12/16 simulated operations. These findings indicate that LAF reduces the airborne microbial risk factor of surgical site infection in comparison to TAF.
The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register (DHR) is a national database on total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with a high completeness and validity of registration for primary procedures. The aim was to validate the registration in DHR for revisions due to Prosthetic Joint Infection (PJI). We identified a cohort of patients in the DHR who underwent primary THA from January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2012 and we followed these patients until first-time revision, death, emigration or December 31, 2012. The PJI diagnosis registered was tested against a gold standard encompassing information from microbiology, prescription, and clinical biochemistry registries in combination with clinical findings retrieved from medical records. We estimated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for PJI in DHR alone and in DHR combined with microbiology registries. Out of 37,828 primary THAs, 1,382 were registered with any revision, 232 of which were due to PJI. For PJI revisions in DHR, the sensitivity was 67.0% (CI: 61.0 – 72.6), specificity 95.2% (CI: 93.8 – 96.4), PPV 77.2% (CI: 71.2 – 82.4), and NPV 92.3% (CI 90.7 – 93.8). Combining DHR with microbiology registries led to a notable increased in the sensitivity for PJI revision to 90.3% (CI: 86.1 – 93.5) and likewise for specificity 99.6% (CI: 99.1 – 99.9), PPV 98.4% (CI: 95.9 – 99.6) and NPV 98.5% (CI: 97.6 – 99.1). Only two thirds of PJI revisions were captured in DHR and the PPV was moderate. However, combining DHR with microbiology registries improved the accuracy remarkably. The study was supported by Region of Southern Denmark and Lillebaelt Hospitals.
