Metal-metal hip resurfacing offers the advantage of conservation of femoral bone stock. In addition, the implant may offer enhanced resistance to dislocation in comparison with conventional total hip arthroplasty. We present a series of 32 female patients with one to 4 year follow up (mean age 57 ranges 50–70 at time of surgery) All patients required hip arthroplasty. Careful preoperative selection was carried out with particular attention paid to estimation of bone density. A standard resurfacing operation was carried out. Patients had pre and postoperative WOMAC and SF36 scoring. All patients were followed closely in the post operative period. No significant complications were noted at follow up. In our study we have shown that given careful patient selection Birmingham hip resurfacing can be safe and reliable form of arthroplasty.
In 12 patients, we measured the oxygen concentration in the femoral head-neck junction during hip resurfacing through the anterolateral approach. This was compared with previous measurements made for the posterior approach. For the anterolateral approach, the oxygen concentration was found to be highly dependent upon the position of the leg, which was adjusted during surgery to provide exposure to the acetabulum and femoral head. Gross external rotation of the hip gave a significant decrease in oxygenation of the femoral head. Straightening the limb led to recovery in oxygen concentration, indicating that the blood supply was maintained. The oxygen concentration at the end of the procedure was not significantly different from that at the start. The anterolateral approach appears to produce less disruption to the blood flow in the femoral head-neck junction than the posterior approach for patients undergoing hip resurfacing. This may be reflected subsequently in a lower incidence of fracture of the femoral neck and avascular necrosis.
A review of the first two hundred and ten patients undergoing Birmingham hip re-surfacing between January 2003 and June 2005 was performed. All surgeries were performed by a single consultant orthopaedic surgeon. All resurfacings were carried out utilising the antero-lateral approach to the hip. Mean review post-operatively was at six weeks. The following clinical parameters were evaluated: length of in-hospital patient stay, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative range of joint movement. In addition, the following radiological measurements were made: the acetabular inclination angle, the head-shaft angle and evidence of leg-length discrepancy. One patient experienced fracture of the femoral neck and two other patients underwent revision surgery. Our results demonstrate that the anterolateral approach represents an alternative approach, with short-term results comaprible to the posterior approach for hip resurfacing.
As our population ages, the incidence of hip fractures per annum is increasing rapidly. Within this patient group are an increasing number of very elderly (over 90 years old). These patients present many challenges to the clinician, both in terms of medical co-morbidities and orthopaedic complications. While the mortality and morbidity of hip fractures in general are well recognised, this study looked exclusively at the outcome in these very elderly patients following admission. We reviewed 100 patients admitted between May 2000 and June 2002. The average age of our patient group was 92.5 years, 18% were male and 82% female. 60% were resident in nursing homes prior to admission, 26% lived with their families and 14% lived alone in the community. 56% of the fractures suffered were intertrochanteric, 40% were intra-capsular and 4% sub-trochanteric. Following admission, these patients waited on average 1.5 days before undergoing surgery, the predominant cause for pre-operative delay being maximisation of pre-operative medical condition. Median pre-operative ASA score was three. The method of anaesthesia used was spinal in 78% and general in 22%. 64% of the group underwent internal fixation and 34% had a hemiarthroplasty. Two patients were deemed unfit to ever undergo surgery. Following surgery, mean in-hospital stay was 9.3 days. There were 8 in-patient post-operative mortalities. Major post-operative morbidities occurred in 8% and included: 3 myocardial infarctions, 2 acute onset cardiac failure and 1 prosthetic dislocation. 11% of patients required a blood transfusion. 25% of the patients died within forty days of surgery, however, 50% of the patients were still alive 126 days post-op. Overall, the mean survival was 195 days. Post-discharge morbidity included two patients who had failure of internal fixation and 8 patients with severe immobility. We conclude that hip fracture surgery in the nonagenarian population is as well tolerated as surgery in younger patients. Careful pre-operative assessment and medical maximisation combined with prompt surgical intervention yielded a good outcome and return to pre-injury status for most patients.
It is now well established that operative repair of Tendo Achilles (TA) ruptures reduces re-rupture rate compared with conservative treatment. Operative repair has been reported to be associated with significant morbidity in 11–29% of cases, in particular wound related complications. In 1977 Ma and Griffith described a percutaneous repair of the TA, however initial results showed a disappointingly high re-ruputre rate of approximately 10%. The senior author has modified the technique initially described in attempt to reduce the re-rupture rate. After marking out the course of the sural nerve, a 2 Ethibond suture is passed into the ruptured tendon end via a stab incision, and passed proximally as in a modified Kessler suture. The suture is then passed first proximally and then back distally in a criss-cross pattern via further stab incisions and brought out at the tendon stump. A second suture is passed into the distal stump in a similar fashion and the sutures tied with the foot in equinus. We recruited a cohort of patients who had undergone percutaneous repair in the last 5 years, and a cohort of age and sex matched controls who had undergone open repair. Both groups of patients were managed postoperatively in equinus cast for 8 weeks. Subjective outcome was measured using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test for non-parametric data. Fifteen patients, mean age of 41.3, underwent percutaneous repair. There were 9 men and 6 women. The median time from injury to repair was 2 days in the percutaneous group and 1 day in the open group. Post-operatively there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in relation to time taken to return to work (12 (percutaneous) versus 10 (open) weeks). However the percutaneous group returned to sport sooner 6 (percutaneous) versus 12 (open) months; p=0.6). There were no re-ruptures in either group. There were two sural nerve injuries in the percutaneous group and none in the open group. There was no significant difference in mean FAOS between the two groups (466 percutaneous versus 468 open). Percutaneous repair of TA ruptures results in a similar functional outcome as the traditional open repair. The increased incidence of sural nerve injury may be associated with the learning curve of the procedure as both of these cases were early in the series. We propose that percutaneous repair is safe and effective. The avoidance of a large skin incision may reduce wound related complications.