We performed a systematic review of the literature
to evaluate the use and interpretation of generic and disease-specific
functional outcome instruments in the reporting of outcome after
the surgical treatment of disruptions of the pelvic ring. A total
of 28 papers met our inclusion criteria, with eight reporting only
generic outcome instruments, 13 reporting only pelvis-specific outcome
instruments, and six reporting both. The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) was
by far the most commonly used generic outcome instrument, used in
12 papers, with widely variable reporting of scores. The pelvis-specific
outcome instruments were used in 19 studies; the Majeed score in
ten, Iowa pelvic score in six, Hannover pelvic score in two and
the Orlando pelvic score in one. Four sets of authors, all testing construct
validity based on correlation with the SF-36, performed psychometric
testing of three pelvis-specific instruments (Majeed, IPS and Orlando
scores). No testing of responsiveness, content validity, criterion
validity, internal consistency or reproducibility was performed. The existing literature in this area is inadequate to inform
surgeons or patients in a meaningful way about the functional outcomes
of these fractures after fixation.
muscle oxygenation changes measured by near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS); muscle protein oxidation; and correlations between muscle oxygenation / hemodynamics and oxidative changes.
FUNDING: MSFHR, COF, BCLA.
FUNDING: MSFHR, COF, BC Lung.
FUNDING: MSFHR, COF, BCLA.
Long term patient outcome data shows statistically significant differences (p<
0.05) between the best results, in patients with direct fixation of bony avulsions (mean = 89), followed by those who had early hamstring reconstruction (mean = 79), followed by those who underwent simple ligament repairs (mean = 65). There was a statistically significant difference (p<
0.05) between the overall scores for the operative group (mean = 80) compared with the non-operative group (mean = 50).
The purpose of the study was to ascertain whether there were benefits from surgical treatment of acetabular fractures within 3 days of injury, as opposed to within a 2–3 week time period as stated in the current literature. This is a matched-pair, retrospective study, using prospectively entered data from 2 trauma units’ databases, of patients with acetabular fractures treated operatively between 1991 and 1996. Patients were matched for age, acetabular fracture pattern and associated injuries. One group of patients had surgery within 3 days of injury (median time to surgery 1. 5 days), the other group had surgery at 4 or more days post-injury (median 8 days, range 4–19 days). There were 128 patients, 64 per group. The proportion of patients with complications was higher in the later surgery group (relative risk 2. 1, CI 0. 24–0. 87). Median lengths of stay were significantly shorter in the early surgery group, 11 days compared to 22 days (p<
0. 001 Mann-Whitney-U test). The rate of HO in the early surgery group was 2% compared with 14% in the later surgery group. The rate of good or excellent results was 81% in patients with earlier surgery, and 72% in the later surgery group, in those with median follow-up time of 24 months. Surgery for acetabular fractures can and should be undertaken as soon as possible. In the setting of our Trauma Units, this seems to confer lower risks of early and late complications, shorter inpatient stay and may improve long-term outcome.
Reamed intramedullary nailing was carried out on 57 Gustilo grade-IIIB tibial fractures in 55 patients. After debridement, there was substantial bone loss in 28 fractures (49%). The mean time to union was 43 weeks (14 to 94). When there was no bone loss, the mean time to union was 32 weeks; it was 45 weeks if there was bone loss. Fractures complicated by infection took a mean of 53 weeks to heal. Revision nailing was necessary in 13 fractures (23%) and bone grafting in 15 (26%). In ten fractures (17.5%) infection developed, in four within six weeks of injury and in six more than four months later. Of these, nine were treated successfully, but one patient required an amputation because of osteomyelitis. Our results indicate that reamed intramedullary nailing is a satisfactory treatment for Gustilo grade-III tibial fractures.