Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 55 - 55
1 Feb 2012
Gibson C Enderby P Hamer A Mawson S Norman P
Full Access

The study aimed to determine how well recorded pain levels and range of motion relate to patients' reported levels of functional ability/disability pre- and post- total hip arthroplasty.

Range of motion (ROM), Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and Self-Report Harris Hip Score (HHS) were recorded pre-operatively and 3 months post-total hip arthroplasty. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated to determine the strength of the relationships both pre- and post-operatively between ROM (calculated using the HHS scoring system) and scores on OHS and HHS and response relating to pain from the questionnaires (question 1 HHS and questions 1, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 12 of OHS) and overall scores.

Only weak relationships were found between ROM and HHS pre- (r = 0.061, n = 99, p = 0.548) and post-operatively (r = 0.373, n = 66, p = 0.002). Similar results were found for OHS, and when ROM was substituted for flexion range. In contrast, strong correlations were found between OHS pain component and HHS pre- (r = -0.753, n = 107, p<0.001) and post-operatively (r = -0.836, n = 87, p<0.001). Strong correlations were also found between the OHS pain component correlated with the HHS functional component only (HHS with score for questions relating to pain deducted) pre- (r = -0.665, n = 107, p<0.001) and post-operatively (r = -0.688, n = 87, p<0.001). Similar results were found when the HHS pain component was correlated with OHS.

In orthopaedic clinical practice ROM is routinely used to assess the success or failure of arthroplasty surgery. These results suggest that this should not be done. Instead, asking the patient the level of pain that they are experiencing may be a good determinant of level of function. The results of this study may aid the development of arthroplasty scoring systems which better assess patients' functional ability.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 86-B, Issue 2 | Pages 269 - 275
1 Mar 2004
Hashmi MA Norman P Saleh M

We describe our medium-term results for the management of chronic osteomyelitis in long bones using the Lautenbach procedure. Seventeen consecutive patients (18 segments) were treated prospectively. Osteomyelitis had been present for a mean of 12.5 years (1 to 31). A discharging sinus was present in all cases. Nine of the associated fractures had failed to unite and a further two needed correction of malunion. The Lautenbach procedure involves debridement, intramedullary reaming and the insertion of double-lumen tubes to establish both a local antibiotic delivery system and cavity analysis for volume and culture. The end-point of treatment is when the irrigate produces three consecutive clear cultures with improvement in the blood indices and obliteration of the cavity volume.

The mean length of treatment was 27 days (14 to 48). One patient required a second procedure and another local debridement for recurrence of the infection. Two patients had Papineau grafting because of cortical defects. All the patients have subsequently remained free from infection. After treatment 11 had internal or external fixation for treatment of non- or malunion or a joint replacement, including two successful limb-lengthening procedures. Two further patients, while cured of infection, underwent amputation for other reasons. The mean length of follow-up was 75 months.

This procedure allows precise control over the osteomyelitis until objective assessment suggests that infection has been cleared and the cavity obliterated.

We recommend this procedure for long-standing complex cases in which basic techniques using debridement and antibiotics have failed.