Altered distal radioulnar joint contact (DRUJ) mechanics are thought to cause degenerative changes in the joint following injury. Much of the current research examining DRUJ arthrokinematics focuses on the effect of joint malalignment and resultant degenerative changes. Little is known regarding native cartilage contact mechanics in the distal radioulnar joint. Moreover, current techniques used to measure joint contact rely on invasive procedures and are limited to statically loaded positions. The purpose of this study was to examine native distal radioulnar joint contact mechanics during simulated active and passive forearm rotation using a non-invasive imaging approach.

Testing was performed using 8 fresh frozen cadaveric specimens (6 men: 2 women, mean age 62 years) with no CT evidence of osteoarthritis. The specimens were thawed and surgically prepared for biomechanical testing by isolating the tendons of relevant muscles involved in forearm rotation. The humerus was then rigidly secured to a wrist simulator allowing for simulated active and passive forearm rotation. Three-dimensional (3D) cartilage surface reconstructions of the distal radius and ulna were created using volumetric data acquired from computed tomography after joint disarticulation. Using optically tracked motion data and 3D surface reconstructions, the relative position of the cartilage models was rendered and used to measure DRUJ cartilage contact mechanics.

The results of this study indicate that contact area was maximal in the DRUJ at 10 degrees of supination (p=0.002). There was more contact area in supination than pronation for both active (p=0.005) and passive (p=0.027) forearm rotation. There was no statistically significant difference in the size of the DRUJ contact patch when comparing analogous rotation angles for simulated active and passive forearm motion (p=0.55). The contact centroid moved 10.5±2.6 mm volar along the volar-dorsal axis during simulated active supination. Along the proximal-distal axis, the contact centroid moved 5.7±2.4 mm proximal during simulated active supination.

Using the technique employed in this study, it was possible to non-invasively examine joint cartilage contact mechanics of the distal radioulnar joint while undergoing simulated, continuous active and passive forearm rotation. Overall, there were higher contact area values in supination compared with pronation, with a peak at 10 degrees of supination. The contact centroid moved volarly and proximally with supination. There was no difference in the measured cartilage contact area when comparing active and passive forearm rotation. This study gives new insight into the changes in contact patterns at the native distal radioulnar joint during simulated forearm rotation, and has implications for increasing our understanding of altered joint contact mechanics in the setting of deformity.

Distal radius fractures are the most common fracture of the upper extremity. Malunion of the distal radius is a common clinical problem after these injuries and frequently leads to pain, stiffness loss of strength and functional impairments. Currently, there is no consensus as to whether not the mal-aligned distal radius has an effect on carpal kinematics of the wrist. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of dorsal angulation (DA) of the distal radius on midcarpal and radiocarpal joint kinematics, and their contributions to total wrist motion.

A passive wrist motion simulator was used to test six fresh-frozen cadaveric upper extremities (age: 67 ± 17yrs). The specimens were amputated at mid humerus, leaving all wrist flexor and extensor tendons and ligamentous structures intact. Tone loads were applied to the wrist flexor and extensor tendons by pneumatic actuators via stainless steel cables. A previously developed distal radius implant was used to simulate native alignment and three DA deformity scenarios (DA 10 deg, 20 deg, and 30 deg). Specimens were rigidly mounted into the simulator with the elbow at 90 degrees of flexion, and guided through a full range of flexion and extension passive motion trials (∼5deg/sec). Carpal motion was captured using optical tracking; radiolunate and capitolunate joint motion was measured and evaluated.

For the normally aligned radius, radiolunate joint motion predominated in flexion, contributing on average 65.4% (±3.4). While the capitolunate joint motion predominated in extension, contributing on 63.8% (±14.0). Increasing DA resulted in significant alterations in radiolunate and capitolunate joint kinematics (p<0.001). There was a reduction of contribution from the capitolunate joint to total wrist motion throughout flexion-extension, significant from 5 degrees of wrist extension to full extension (p = 0.024). Conversely, the radiolunate joint increased its contribution to motion with increasing DA; significant from 5 degrees of wrist extension to full extension as the radiolunate and capitolunate joint kinematics mirrored each other. A DA of 30 degrees resulted in an average radiolunate contribution of 72.6% ± 7.7, across the range of motion of 40 degrees of flexion to 25 degrees of extension.

The results of our study for the radius in a normal anatomic alignment are consistent with prior investigators, showing the radiocarpal joint dominated flexion, and the midcarpal joint dominated extension; with an average 60/40 division in contributions for the radiocarpal in flexion and the midcarpal in extension, respectfully. As DA increased, the radiocarpal joint provided a larger contribution of motion throughout flexion and extension. This alteration in carpal kinematics with increased distal radius dorsal angulation may increase localised stresses and perhaps lead to accelerated joint wear and wrist pain in patients with malunited distal radial fractures.

Wrist motion is achieved primarily via rotation at the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints. The contribution of each carpal bone to total range of motion has been previously investigated, although there is no consensus regarding the influence of each structure to global wrist motion. The objective of this comprehensive in-vitro biomechanical study was to determine the kinematics of the capitate, scaphoid and lunate during unconstrained simulated wrist flexion-extension. In addition, this study examined the effect of motion direction (i.e. flexion or extension) on the kinematics and contribution of the carpal bones.

Seven fresh frozen cadaveric upper limb specimens (age: 67±18 yrs) were amputated mid-humerus, and the wrist flexors/extensors were exposed and sutured at their musculotendinous junctions. Each specimen was mounted on a wrist motion simulator in neutral forearm rotation with the elbow at 90° flexion. Passive flexion and extension motion of the wrist was simulated by moving a K-wire, inserted into the third metacarpal, through the flexion/extension motion arc at a speed of ∼5 mm/sec under muscle tone loads of 10N. Carpal kinematics were captured using optical tracking of bone fixated markers. Kinematic data was analysed from ±35° flexion/extension.

Scaphoid and lunate motion differed between wrist flexion and extension, but correlated linearly (R‸2=0.99,0.97) with capitate motion. In wrist extension, the scaphoid (p=0.03) and lunate (p=0.01) extended 83±19% & 37±18% respectively relative to the capitate. In wrist flexion, the scaphoid (p=1.0) and lunate (p=0.01) flexed 95±20% and 70±12% respectively relative to the capitate. The ratio of carpal rotation to global wrist rotation decreased as the wrist moved from flexion to extension. The lunate rotates on average 46±25% less than the capitate and 35±31% less than the scaphoid during global wrist motion (p=0.01). The scaphoid rotates on average 11±19% less than the capitate during wrist flexion and extension (p=0.07). There was no difference in the contribution of carpal bone motion to global wrist motion during flexion (p=0.26) or extension (p=0.78).

The capitate, lunate and scaphoid move synergistically throughout planar motions of the wrist. Our study found that both the scaphoid and lunate contributed at a greater degree during wrist flexion compared to extension, suggesting that the radiocarpal joint plays a more critical role in wrist flexion. Our results agree with previous studies demonstrating that the scaphoid and lunate do not contribute equally to wrist motion and do not function as a single unit during planar wrist motion. The large magnitude of differential rotation observed between the scaphoid and lunate may be responsible for the high incidence of scapholunate ligament injuries relative to other intercarpal ligaments. An understanding of normal carpal kinematics may assist in developing more durable wrist arthroplasty designs.

Wrist motion is achieved primarily via rotation at the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints. The contribution of each carpal bone to total range of motion has been previously investigated, although there is no consensus regarding the influence of each structure to global wrist motion. The objective of this comprehensive in-vitro biomechanical study was to determine the kinematics of the capitate, scaphoid and lunate during unconstrained simulated wrist flexion-extension. In addition, this study examined the effect of motion direction (i.e. flexion or extension) on the kinematics and contribution of the carpal bones.

Seven fresh frozen cadaveric upper limb specimens (age: 67±18 yrs) were amputated mid-humerus, and the wrist flexors/extensors were exposed and sutured at their musculotendinous junctions. Each specimen was mounted on a wrist motion simulator in neutral forearm rotation with the elbow at 90° flexion. Passive flexion and extension motion of the wrist was simulated by moving a K-wire, inserted into the third metacarpal, through the flexion/extension motion arc at a speed of ∼5 mm/sec under muscle tone loads of 10N. Carpal kinematics were captured using optical tracking of bone fixated markers. Kinematic data was analysed from ±35° flexion/extension.

Scaphoid and lunate motion differed between wrist flexion and extension, but correlated linearly (R^2=0.99,0.97) with capitate motion. In wrist extension, the scaphoid (p=0.03) and lunate (p=0.01) extended 83±19% & 37±18% respectively relative to the capitate. In wrist flexion, the scaphoid (p=1.0) and lunate (p=0.01) flexed 95±20% and 70±12% respectively relative to the capitate. The ratio of carpal rotation to global wrist rotation decreased as the wrist moved from flexion to extension. The lunate rotates on average 46±25% less than the capitate and 35±31% less than the scaphoid during global wrist motion (p=0.01). The scaphoid rotates on average 11±19% less than the capitate during wrist flexion and extension (p=0.07). There was no difference in the contribution of carpal bone motion to global wrist motion during flexion (p=0.26) or extension (p=0.78).

The capitate, lunate and scaphoid move synergistically throughout planar motions of the wrist. Our study found that both the scaphoid and lunate contributed at a greater degree during wrist flexion compared to extension, suggesting that the radiocarpal joint plays a more critical role in wrist flexion. Our results agree with previous studies demonstrating that the scaphoid and lunate do not contribute equally to wrist motion and do not function as a single unit during planar wrist motion. The large magnitude of differential rotation observed between the scaphoid and lunate may be responsible for the high incidence of scapholunate ligament injuries relative to other intercarpal ligaments. An understanding of normal carpal kinematics may assist in developing more durable wrist arthroplasty designs.

Fracture or resection of the radial head can cause unbalance and long-term functional complications in the elbow. Studies have shown that a radial head excision can change elbow kinematics and decrease elbow stability. The radial head is also important in both valgus and varus laxity and displacement. However, the effect of radial head on ulnohumeral joint load is not known. The objective of this experimental study was to compare the axial loading produced at the ulnohumeral joint during active flexion with and without a radial head resection.

Ten cadaveric arms were used. Each specimen was prepared and secured in an elbow motion simulator. To simulate active flexion, the tendons of the biceps, brachialis, brachioradialis, and triceps were attached to servo motors. The elbow was moved through a full range of flexion. To quantify loads at the ulnohumeral joint, a load cell was implanted in the proximal ulna. Testing was conducted in the intact then radial head resected case, in supination in the horizontal, vertical, varus and valgus positions.

When comparing the average loads during flexion, the axial ulnar load in the horizontal position was 89±29N in an intact state compared to 122±46N during radial head resection. In the vertical position, the intact state produced a 67±16N load while the resected state was 78±23N. In the varus and valgus positions, intact state resulted in loads of 57±26N and 18±3N, respectively. Conversely, with a radial head resection, varus and valus positions measured 56±23N and 54±23N loads, respectively. For both joint configurations, statistical differences were observed for all flexion angles in all arm positions during active flexion (p=0.0001). When comparing arm positions and flexion angle, statistical differences were measured between valgus, horizontal and vertical (p<0.005) except for varus position (p=0.64).

Active flexion caused a variation in loads throughout flexion when comparing intact versus radial head resection. The most significant variation in ulnar loading occurred during valgus and horizontal flexion. The vertical and varus position showed little variation because the position of the arm is not affected by the loss of the radial head. However, in valgus position, the resected radial head creates a void in the joint space and, with gravity, causes greater compensatory ulnar loading. In the horizontal position, the forearm is not directly affected by gravitational pull and cannot adjust to counterbalance the resected radial head, therefore loads are localised in the ulnohumeral joint. These findings prove the importance of the radial head and that a radial head resection can overload the ulnohumeral side.