Management of highly displaced acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injuries remain contentious. It is unclear if delayed versus acute reconstruction has an increased risk of fixation failure and complications. The primary aim of this was to compare complications of early versus delayed reconstruction. The secondary aim was to determine modes of failure of ACJ reconstruction requiring revision surgery.

A retrospective study was performed of all patients who underwent operative reconstruction of ACJ injuries over a 10-year period (Rockwood III-V). Reconstruction was classed as early (<12 weeks from injury) or delayed (≥12 weeks). Patient demographics, fixation method and post-operative complications were noted, with one-year follow-up a minimum requirement for inclusion. Fixation failure was defined as loss of reduction requiring revision surgery.

104 patients were analysed (n=60 early and n=44 delayed). Mean age was 42.0 (SD 11.2, 17–70 years), 84.6% male and 16/104 were smokers. No difference was observed between fixation failure (p=0.39) or deep infection (p=0.13) with regards to acute versus delayed reconstruction. No patient demographic or timing of surgery was predictive of fixation failure on regression modelling. Overall, eleven patients underwent revision surgery for loss of reduction and implant failure (n=5 suture fatigue, n=2 endo-button escape, n=2 coracoid stress fracture and n=2 deep infection).

This study suggests that delayed ACJ reconstruction does not have a higher incidence of fixation failure or major complications compared to acute reconstruction. For those patients with ongoing pain and instability following a trial of non-operative treatment, delayed reconstruction would appear to be a safe treatment approach.

The Olympia femoral stem is a stainless steel, anatomically shaped, polished and three-dimensionally tapered implant designed for use in cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). The primary aim of this study was to determine the long-term survivorship, radiographic outcome, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) of the Olympia stem.

Between May 2003 and December 2005, 239 patients (264 THAs) underwent a THA with an Olympia stem in our institution. PROMs were assessed using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) score and patient satisfaction at mean 10-years following THA. Patient records and radiographs were then reviewed at a mean of 16.5 years (SD 0.7, 15.3 to 17.8) following THA to identify occurrence of complications or revision surgery for any cause.

Mean patient age at surgery was 68.0 years (SD 10.9, 31–93 years). There were 156 women (65%, 176 THAs). Osteoarthritis was the indication for THA in 204 patients (85%). Stem survivorship at 10 years was 99.2% (95 % confidence interval [CI], 97.9%-100%) and at 15 years was 97.5% (94.6%–100%). The 15-year stem survival for aseptic loosening was 100%. Only one occurrence of peri-prosthetic fracture was identified, with no episodes of dislocation found. At a mean of 10 (SD 0.8, 8.7 –11.3) years follow-up, mean OHS was 39 (SD 10.3, range 7 – 48) and 94% of patients reported being very satisfied or satisfied.

The Olympia stem demonstrated excellent 10-year PROMs, very high rates of stem survivorship and negligible peri-prosthetic fracture and dislocation rate at final follow-up beyond 15 years.

The aim of this study was to define the long-term outcome following adolescent clavicle fracture.

We retrospectively reviewed all adolescent fractures presenting to our region (13–17years) over a 10-year period. Patient reported outcomes were undertaken at a minimum of 4 years post-injury (QuickDASH and EQ-5D) in completely displaced midshaft fractures (Edinburgh 2B, >2cm displacement, n=50) and angulated midshaft fractures (Edinburgh 2A2, >30 degrees angulation, n=32).

677 clavicle fractures were analysed. The median age was 14.8 (IQR 14.0–15.7) and 89% were male. The majority were midshaft (n=606, 89.5%) with either angulation (39.8%) or simple fully displaced (39.1%). Only 3% of midshaft fractures underwent acute fixation (n=18/606), all of which were fully displaced. The incidence of refracture following non-operative management of midshaft fractures was 3.2% (n=19/588), all united with non-operative management. Fracture type, severity of angulation or displacement was not associated with risk of refracture. There was one case of non-union encountered following non-operative management of all displaced midshaft fractures (0.4%, n=1/245). At a mean of 7.6 years following injury, non-operative management of both displaced and angulated fractures had a median QuickDASH was 0.0 (IQR 0.0–2.3), EQ-5D was 1.0 (IQR 1.0–1.0). 97% of angulated fractures and 94% of displaced fractures were satisfied with their final shoulder function.

We conclude that Non-operative management of adolescent midshaft clavicle fractures result in excellent functional outcomes with a low rate of complications at long-term follow up. The relative indications for surgical intervention for clavicle fractures in adults do not appear to be applicable to adolescents.

To evaluate if clinical recovery following midshaft clavicle fracture is associated with nonunion and determine if this has superior predictive value compared to estimation at time of injury.

A prospective study of all patients (≥16 years) who sustained a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture was performed. We assessed patient demographics, injury factors, functional scores and radiographic predictors with a standardized protocol at six-weeks. Conditional-stepwise regression was used to assess which factors independently predicted nonunion at six-months post-injury determined by CT. The nonunion predictor six-week model (NUP6) was compared against a previously validated model based on factors available at time of injury (NUP0-smoking, comminution and fracture displacement).

200 patients completed follow-up at six months. The nonunion rate was 14% (27/200). Of the functional scores, the QuickDASH had the highest accuracy on receiver-operator-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with a 39.8 threshold, above which was associated with nonunion (Area Under Curve (AUC) 76.8%, p<0.001).

On regression modelling QuickDASH ≥40 (p=0.001), no callus on radiograph (p=0.004) and fracture movement on examination (p=0.001) were significant predictors of nonunion. If none were present the predicted nonunion risk was 3%, found in 40% of the cohort (n=80/200). Conversely if two or more were present, found in 23.5% of the cohort, the predicted nonunion risk was 60%.

The NUP6 model appeared to have superior accuracy when compared to the NUP0 model on ROC curve analysis (AUC 87.3% vs 64.8% respectively).

Delayed assessment at six-weeks following displaced clavicle fracture enables a more accurate prediction of fracture healing.

The primary aim of this study was to undertake a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of acute fixation versus conservative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The secondary aim was to conduct a sensitivity analysis of patient characteristics that may influence a threshold of £20,000 per quality-adjusted life year gained (QALY).

A CEA was conducted from a randomised control trial comparing conservative management (n=92) to acute plate fixation (n=86) of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used to express the cost per QALY. The short form 6-dimensional (SF-6D) score was the preference based index to calculate the cost per QALY.

The 12-month SF-6D advantage of acute fixation over conservative management was 0.0085 (p=0.464) with a mean cost difference of £4,096.22 and resultant ICER of £481,908.24/QALY. For a threshold of £20,000/QALY the benefit of acute fixation would need to be present for 24.1 years. Linear regression analysis identified nonunion as the only independent factor to influence the SF-6D at 12-months (p<0.001). Conservatively managed fractures that resulted in a nonunion (n=16) had a significantly worse SF-6D compared to acute fixation (0.0723, p=0.001) with comparable healthcare cost at 12-months (£170.12 difference). Modelling the ICER of acute fixation against those complicated by a nonunion proved to be cost effective at £2,352.97/QALY at 12-months.

Routine plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures is not cost-effective. Patients with nonunion after conservative management have increased morbidity with comparable expense to those undergoing acute fixation which suggests targeting these patients is a more cost-effective strategy.

Increasing demands on our emergency department (ED) has resulted in the reduction of manipulations (MUAs) at the ‘front door’. We hypothesised that MUAs undertaken in theatre is rising with adverse financial implications. We performed a retrospective audit of operating lists in our institution from 2013–2016. Cost estimates were determined by our finance department. We used the NICE guidelines on management of non-complex fractures (NG38 Feb2016) as our audit standard.

Data on 1372 cases performed over a three-month representative period during 2013–2016 was analysed. MUAs were 13% of the total theatre workload, with an annual increase in volume noted. Additionally, simple displaced distal radius fractures were routinely receiving a MUA (with or without K-wires) as a primary procedure in theatre. When this workload is combined it makes up 22% of the total theatre workload. Average theatre time was 57 minutes per case. Delays to definite procedure ranged from 8 to 120 hours. Cost of hospital admission and theatre utilisation was approximately £1000 per patient. Conversely, the cost of a MUA in the ED was estimated at £150. Given that we currently undertake around 15 manipulations in theatre a month, performing such work in the ED it would save approximately £153,000 a year to our health board.

This audit identifies that MUAs of common orthopaedic injuries undertaken in theatre can lead too significant clinical and financial costs. We have proposed a strong financial argument to management for a twice weekly ‘manipulation list’ in the ED which is currently under review.

This study reports on the natural history of acetabular fracture dislocations. We retrospectively reviewed patients who sustained an acetabular fracture associated with a posterior hip dislocation from a prospective database. Patient characteristics, complications and the requirement for further surgery were recorded. Patient outcomes were measured using the Oxford Hip score and Short Form SF-12 health survey.

A total of 99 patients were treated over a 24 year period. The mean age was 41 years. Open reduction and internal fixation was performed in the majority (n=87), 10 were managed conservatively following closed reduction and two underwent primary total hip replacement (THR). At a median follow up of 12.4 years (range 4–24 years) patient outcomes were available for 53 patients. 12 patients had died. 19 patients went onto have a THR as a secondary procedure, of which 11 had confirmed avascular necrosis. Median time to THR was 2 years (range 1–17 years). The mean Oxford hip score was 35 (range 2–48), SF-12 physical component score (PCS) was 40 and a third of the patients used a walking aid. In THR group the mean Oxford score was 32 (range 3–46), SF-12 PCS was 39 and almost all required a walking aid.

This is the first study to present the long term outcomes following an acetabular fracture dislocation. Our study suggests there is considerable disability in this group of patients and the requirement for subsequent THR has inferior patient reported outcomes.