There are several advantages of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) in the treatment of isolated compartment osteoarthritis (OA) compared to the conventional total knee arthroplasty. Although various series report similar survivorship results, the national registries tend to show higher revision rates among the UKA. Persisting, unexplainable pain is a leading cause for UKA revision surgery. Therefore it is essential to investigate the various patient specific characteristics which might influence outcome following UKA in order to minimize revision rates and optimize clinical outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the various individual patient factors, including pre-operative radiographic parameters, on the outcome following UKA. 168 consecutive patients who underwent robot assisted UKA (MAKO Tactile Guidance System, MAKO Surgical Corporation, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA) were included. The investigated pre- and/or postoperative parameters included gender, BMI, age, type of tibial implant (inlay versus onlay), laterality, state of OA (i.e. Kellgren and Lawrence grade) of the operated and non-operated compartment and mechanical axis alignment. Pre-operatively and at a minimum of 1 year (average 1.97 years, range 1 – 4.2 years) following surgery, patients were asked to complete the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. It is subdivided in three separate scales (i.e. pain, stiffness and function). A score of 0 represents the best possible outcome and a score of 100 the worst. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.Introduction
Methods
Conventional, extramedullary (EM) tibial alignment guides are only 65%–88% accurate in creating a tibial resection within 2° of perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare the overall, tibial component alignment, and the surgeon's ability to achieve a specific, intraoperative goal for alignment between a portable, navigation system (KneeAlign™) and conventional, EM alignment guides. One hundred patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized controlled study. Fifty patients received a TKA using the KneeAlign™ to perform the tibial resection, and 50 patients an EM alignment guide. Standing AP hip-to-ankle radiographs and lateral knee-to-ankle radiographs were obtained at the first, postoperative visit.Background:
Methods:
There is a high prevalence of obesity in the United States and the numbers are increasing. These patients comprise a significant portion of the shoulder arthroplasty patient population. There are several reports of outcomes in the literature on obese patients after total knee or hip replacement, however, this data is lacking in the shoulder arthroplasty patient population. The purpose of this study is to compare the functional outcomes and complications of obese patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty with the non-obese population. Between 2009 to 2010, 76 patients that had a primary total shoulder replacement were grouped according to their Body Mass Index (BMI) and followed prospectively for 2 years. The groups were divided as normal (BMI <25, N=26), overweight (25 to 30 BMI, N=25), and obese (>30 BMI, N=25) according to the World Health Organization classifications. Preoperative demographics, age, comorbidities and postoperative complications were recorded. Perioperative operating room and hospital data were analyzed. Functional outcome measurements including ASES, SF-36 physical component (PC) scores, mental component (MC) scores and visual analog scale along with general health and fatigue were evaluated at the 0 and 2 year time period. Statistical analyses were performed.Introduction
Methods
Our aim was to compare the passive kinematics and coronal plane stability throughout flexion in the native and the replaced knee, using three different TKA designs: posterior stabilized (PS), bi-cruciate substituting (BCS), and ultracongruent (UC). Our hypotheses were: 1.) a guided motion knee replacement (BCS) offers the closest replication of native knee kinematics in terms of femoral rollback 2.) the replaced knee will be significantly more stable in the coronal plane than the native knee; 3.) No difference exists in coronal plane stability between the 3 implants/designs throughout flexion. After IRB approval, two cadaveric specimens were used for a pilot study to determine sample size. Five fresh-frozen hip-to-toe cadaveric specimens then underwent TKA using an anatomic measured resection technique with a computer-navigated robotic femoral cutting-guide. The PS, BCS, and UC TKA designs were implanted in each knee using the same distal and posterior femoral cuts to standardize the position of the implants. Computer navigation was then utilized to record the varus/valgus laxity of each implant at 0°, 30°, 60° and 90° of flexion while applying a standardized 9.8Nm moment. Passive tibiofemoral kinematics were measured in a continuous passive motion machine from 10° to 110°. Femoral rollback on the tibia was calculated for the native and replaced knees by measuring the closest point (CP) on the femoral condyle to a transverse plane perpendicular to the mechanical axis of the tibia at each flexion angle.Purpose
Methods
